Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,996 posts)
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 08:51 PM Oct 2017

Trump listened with interest at Papadopolous pitch for campaign meeting with Putin: report

In the midst of a coordinated White House effort to distance Donald Trump from former staffer George Papadopoulos, The New York Times reported Tuesday on details from a March 31, 2016 campaign meeting.

Citing a former campaign aide who attended the meeting, The Times reported Trump “listened with interest” as Papadopoulos pitched the idea of a personal meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Though campaign supervisor Sam Clovis worried about the “optics” of a meeting with the Russian strongman, Trump asked questions of Papadopoulos’s plan.

Trump “didn’t say yes, and he didn’t say no” the source disclosed.

However, then Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) rejected the meeting and asked those assembled to never speak of it again.



MORE:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/31/us/trump-foreign-policy-advisers.html?pagewanted=all
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/10/trump-listened-with-interest-at-papadopolous-pitch-for-campaign-meeting-with-putin-report/

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

bearsfootball516

(6,377 posts)
2. I mean, it isn't illegal for Trump to listen to someone pitch him having a meeting with Putin
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 08:58 PM
Oct 2017

Shady as hell, yes. But unless he actually had a meeting, it's not illegal. Personally, I doubt the two ever met face-to-face during the campaign. Not to say there wasn't collusion, just that I don't think they met.

riversedge

(70,242 posts)
4. 'new questions about sessions knowledge of contacts between Russia and Trump
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 09:00 PM
Oct 2017

campaign' is the runner.

 

Kirk Lover

(3,608 posts)
6. We already know that they met with the Russians. I can only IMAGINE what we don't know.
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 09:12 PM
Oct 2017

They are fucked.

 

Hornedfrog1985

(118 posts)
7. Youre telling me...
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 09:18 PM
Oct 2017

The man with the all time greatest memory doesnt remember someone asking him to go meet the dictator of russia? I think i would remember exactly who it was that pitched that to me. Because it woukd be totally batshit insane.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
8. Pundit on MSNBC said, about Sessions rejecting the idea:
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 11:04 PM
Oct 2017

Pundit said that some are saying, "See? Sessions rejected the idea of Trump meeting Putin. That shows they weren't involved in things like that." The Pundit said that no, that doesn't show that at all....because it would have been INSANE for Trump to meet personally with Putin. That's why Sessions rejected it.

ThoughtCriminal

(14,047 posts)
9. But what kind of coffee did Papadopoulos bring to the meeting?
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 11:07 PM
Oct 2017

I mean, that was what he was there for. Right?

Bring coffee and arrange a meeting with Putin. In that order. And nothing else.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
10. They're trying to distract from the criminal part, accepting "dirt" on Hillary from illegal hacking
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 11:10 PM
Oct 2017

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,007 posts)
11. Sessions probably party to a top-level back channel already arranged with Russians
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 11:25 PM
Oct 2017

Hence rejection. No need for duplication.

Clovis and Papadopoulos probably out of the loop of the top-level back channel. Probably arranged by Manafort and Carter Page. May have involved Roger Stone though he may have only been the main coordination with Wikileaks.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump listened with inter...