General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsManafort and Gates Pose Serious Risk of Flight, Says Mueller
<snip>
"The defendants pose a risk of flight based on the serious nature of the charges, their history of deceptive and misleading conduct, the potentially significant sentences the defendants face, the strong evidence of guilt, their significant financial resources, and their foreign connections," Mueller's office wrote in a bail memo unsealed Tuesday.
"Both have had substantial overseas ties, including assets held abroad, significant foreign work connections, and significant travel abroad. Those aspects of the defendants' history and characteristics evidence a risk of flight."
<snip>
In the memo, Mueller's office calculated the possible maximum sentences under federal sentencing guidelines if Manafort and Gates were convicted. Gates could serve up to 12 years and seven months and Manafort is facing up to 15 years and eight months in prison, the prosecutors said.
"The possibility of prison sentences in these ranges alone establishes a risk of flight as to both defendants," the filing says.
Both men have pleaded not guilty. Manafort's bail was set at $10 million, Gates's at $5 million. Both are confined to their homes by court order. - NBC News
onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)instead of finding and arresting them (they still had their passports then even)?
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Where are they going to go, legally. The only way they will get out of here is if they are assisted by another party or government that gets them out of here illegally. That's not going to look good.
babylonsister
(171,070 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)They would pretty much be admitting guilt and their fear of Trump's retaliation.
Thrill
(19,178 posts)Im sure they could get out of the country without passports
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I think they are pretty much between a rock and a hard place.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)is if they are killed by a foregn power or business interest. That would probably be more easily done at their home.
I think they should have been held in top security confinement for safety reasons. Witnesses have to be preserved I would think.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)It's the only thing that would keep them safe. If they go anywhere else, they are easy targets. Nobody will protect them if they flee.
Hornedfrog1985
(118 posts)I have a feeling theyre under surveilance
malaise
(269,054 posts)I can't wait
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)complete with hacking equipment.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)put their personal reputation on the line. Thursday is their Bail Hearing.