Hillary haters:"Why is it wrong to get political dirt from Russia? "

[librechik]

Where do you even start?

[bearsfootball516]

1. Something called treason, I think.

[DrDan]

9. it is obviously not right . . . but does not rise to the level of treason

Last edited Tue Oct 31, 2017, 01:56 PM - Edit history (1)

[UCmeNdc]

10. No it rises to the level of treason.

If I make a deal with a foreign country and will do what they want me to do to help their interests including giving up sovereignty of my home country in return for their help in getting me elected then that is treason.

[DrDan]

11. nope - does not rise to the constitutional definition of treason

[Scoopster]

2. It starts with the Constitution.

All it takes is a finger to point out where the Titles of Nobility/Emoluments clause and Article 3 Section 3 (Treason) are. These people are the kinds of idiots who have probably never read the damn thing.

[Initech]

3. It's called "gas lighting".

The GOP is trying to manipulate us and blame us for their faults, like they always do. Because they have no argument otherwise.

[marylandblue]

4. It's only wrong when Hillary does it

So we need 8 investigations to prove she didn't purposely lose the election by paying the Russians to help Trump.

[NCTraveler]

5. I dont think it is wrong without extenuating circumstances.

I have zero problem with a campaign getting information from anywhere. It’s up to the campaign to verify the information. It’s also up to the candidate and campaign to make it very clear that the information was paid for with campaign funds.

Not an once of Clinton hate in me.

[unblock]

6. They didn't just ask for political dirt. They asked for them to commit espionage

[maxsolomon]

7. This information was obtained ILLEGALLY

via Espionage, by a hostile foreign government. FFS.

[crosinski]

8. Thank you.

[mreilly]

12. I have also seen them insist...

... that they trust Russia more than Hillary.

Think about that for a moment.

That.

Is.

Fucking.

TREASON.