Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pnwmom

(108,980 posts) Sat Oct 28, 2017, 02:36 AM Oct 2017

Maybe Woolsey is the source-who-was-briefed, and the reason he was briefed

is that he has been working with Mueller on the Flynn case.

Any lawyers out there who have an opinion on that? Might an important witness be briefed about the imminent arrest of someone who was indicted?

In which case Flynn might be among the first to be indicted.

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Maybe Woolsey is the source-who-was-briefed, and the reason he was briefed (Original Post) pnwmom Oct 2017 OP

Not a lawyer, but a good way to put pressure on lots of folks... 4139 Oct 2017 #1

4139

(1,893 posts)

1. Not a lawyer, but a good way to put pressure on lots of folks...

Reply to pnwmom (Original post)

Sat Oct 28, 2017, 05:50 AM

Oct 2017

who are being investigated to see if you can squeeze anything out of them.

The indictment may be for ‘one’ but it puts pressure on all

Reply to this discussion