Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsso what does the CIA, FBI and other government agencies still have to hide after 54 years?
what?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
13 replies, 587 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
so what does the CIA, FBI and other government agencies still have to hide after 54 years? (Original Post)
spanone
Oct 2017
OP
Maybe hidden sources that could be killed/imprisoned in their respective countries
Madam45for2923
Oct 2017
#2
maveric
(16,446 posts)1. GHWB?
He was there but can't remember it.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)5. I bet he grabbed babushka ladies ass before he left though
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)2. Maybe hidden sources that could be killed/imprisoned in their respective countries
Sneederbunk
(14,308 posts)3. Incompetence.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)4. Anti Castro and CIA coordination of the main event
Kaleva
(36,354 posts)6. Why are the investigators who claim Oswald didn't act alone so incompetent?
I think that's the more important question.
54 years and no one has been able to provide solid evidence that supports their pet conspiracy theory
rusty fender
(3,428 posts)7. That Oswald was a CIA asset
BootinUp
(47,197 posts)8. I could post 3 videos
That would take 15 minutes to watch, and demonstrate beyond any reasonable doubt that Oswald was the lone shooter, when combined with accepted evidence, but why bother? People choose to be emotionally committed to their pet theory instead of actually weighing facts. It is therefore a waste of time, which my post is as well, lol.
Kaleva
(36,354 posts)9. Fanaticism isn't just limited to religion
johnp3907
(3,733 posts)10. Post the 3 videos anyway.
I'll watch 'em!
BootinUp
(47,197 posts)11. If u like,
I can pm them to u a little later. But I don't feel like seeing responses to them in this thread.
johnp3907
(3,733 posts)12. PM would be fine.
Thanks.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)13. This one is good
First off, you have to get past the Oliver Stone film's account of events. This video does a good job of untangling the nonsense around the trajectory of the bullet that went through JFK's throat and into Connally's back:
&t=6s