Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,066 posts)
Wed Oct 25, 2017, 03:14 PM Oct 2017

Rethugs Are Pretending They Didn't Fund The Trump Golden Shower Dossier Before Hillary Clinton



Republicans Are Pretending They Didn't Fund The Trump Golden Shower Dossier Before Hillary Clinton
By Jason Le Miere On 10/25/17 at 11:30 AM


Shortly after a report emerged Tuesday evening claiming that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee in part funded a dossier containing explosive allegations about President Donald Trump’s links to Russia, the Republican National Committee trumpeted the story in outrage.

There was just one problem with the version of the Washington Post story that the RNC reposted on its website: a line stating that prior to the Clinton campaign picking up the tab, the research was “funded by an unknown Republican during the GOP primary” was notably absent.




It has been widely reported for several months that the campaign of an anti-Trump Republican initially funded the dossier before Democrats took over payments to Washington firm Fusion GPS as the 2016 primaries began to conclude.

more...

http://www.newsweek.com/republicans-trump-russia-dossier-clinton-692664
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rethugs Are Pretending They Didn't Fund The Trump Golden Shower Dossier Before Hillary Clinton (Original Post) babylonsister Oct 2017 OP
Excellent article by Josh Marshall at TPM underpants Oct 2017 #1
What is the big deal over who funded it? Its oppo research. stopbush Oct 2017 #2
They are using every means possible to misdirect the public about this, The_Casual_Observer Oct 2017 #4
Exactly! Proud Liberal Dem Oct 2017 #5
And one wonders why the so called Wellstone ruled Oct 2017 #3
The GOP funded this dossier first Gothmog Oct 2017 #6
Weird, huh? gratuitous Oct 2017 #7

underpants

(182,823 posts)
1. Excellent article by Josh Marshall at TPM
Wed Oct 25, 2017, 03:25 PM
Oct 2017
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-big-wapo-story-why-everyone-needs-to-thank-marc-elias

The Big WaPo Story & Why Everyone Needs to Thank Marc Elias

Look back at almost countless articles on the so-called Steele Dossier and you’ll find the same basic account. The project began as an opposition research project funded by Republicans during the GOP primaries when, of course, there were Republicans with an interest in finding damaging information about Donald Trump. After Trump sealed the GOP nomination, Republicans had no desire or interest in funding this research. So Democrats agreed to start footing the bill.

Is this new? Not really. Here is I believe the first reporting on what we now know as the Steele Dossier. It’s an October 31st report from David Corn in Mother Jones, reporting how a veteran spy had provided information to the FBI about a Russian operation to cultivate Donald Trump.

In any case, there’s a big effort now to present this as somehow being a scandal in itself, or discrediting Steele’s sleuthing. That is ridiculous. Is it really a scandal that Democrats helped fund research into Donald Trump’s illicit ties to Russia after Republicans donors decided they didn’t care anymore?

Not really.

The Trump team wanted to deliver for Russia right out of the gate in January, a quick series of accommodations and a ‘grand bargain’ with Vladimir Putin. It was the investigation into Trump’s ties to Russia that got in the way and mainly prevented it. It’s clear that Steele’s research played a major role in that. Remember, the FBI found it so critical it agreed to continue funding Steele’s research. Without Marc Elias’s decision, that research may never have been conducted. The country owes him a debt of gratitude.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
2. What is the big deal over who funded it? Its oppo research.
Wed Oct 25, 2017, 03:28 PM
Oct 2017

Every campaign does it.

The only thing that’s disturbing are the facts revealed in the dossier.

 

The_Casual_Observer

(27,742 posts)
4. They are using every means possible to misdirect the public about this,
Wed Oct 25, 2017, 03:41 PM
Oct 2017

including making a new assault on the Uranium thing. It's a coordinated attack.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
3. And one wonders why the so called
Wed Oct 25, 2017, 03:30 PM
Oct 2017

Corporate Media missed this,well,they new full well if they ran with any story about Steele,their access to Trump was gone and after all,he was selling the tickets to the biggest Corporate Take over of America.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
7. Weird, huh?
Wed Oct 25, 2017, 05:39 PM
Oct 2017

I swear to God, the media could be distracted by someone jingling their key chain. Opposition research being done by . . . a political opponent? Unheard of! Unthinkable! What were these campaigns trying to do - win? Did you see the way the Houston Astros kept trying to make the Dodgers lose last night by swinging at pitches when they were on offense and throwing out runners when they were on defense? Whoever heard of such a thing?!

HOW DOES THIS QUALIFY AS NEWS, fer crissakes? But here's all the outlets, just flabbergasted that the Clinton campaign, and before them, a "still unknown" Republican campaign (hint: the candidate's name rhymes with Gleb Tush), were looking into Candidate Trump's record.

I guess it's news to the popular media, since they couldn't be bothered to delve too deeply into Donald Trump's past.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rethugs Are Pretending Th...