Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDUTY TO WARN
should, if it doesn't already, apply to presidential cabinet members. Sessions REFUSES to testify about what Dotard said to him on the basis of executive privilege. This needs to be challenged. After all, the safety of not just our nation, but the entire world depends on it.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 913 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DUTY TO WARN (Original Post)
MoonRiver
Oct 2017
OP
Irish_Dem
(47,399 posts)1. Warning Americans about a danger means you have to care about Americans.
And their well being. Trump and his cronies do not care at all.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)2. Sessions is anti government and is against the American people
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)3. Oh boy,
using the Reagan/Nixon defense.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)4. That won't impress Franken, lol!
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)5. Sessions fears only Franken because
Al and his Aides do their homework and come prepared with facts. And as we all know here,the GOP as a whole,is void of facts.