General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump could remake judiciary for '40 years' - with controversial picks
Senate Republicans are rallying behind Trumps judicial nominees, including those considered unqualified or with explosive views.
By SEUNG MIN KIM 10/17/2017 05:05 AM EDT
President Donald Trump has nominated 50 candidates to lifetime appointments to the federal bench including a man who asserted transgender children were evidence of Satans plan, one deemed unqualified by the American Bar Association and a handful of prolific bloggers.
And the GOP has unanimously stuck by Trumps judges. Senate Republicans have cleared judicial nominees at a comparatively rapid clip this year even as the conservative base has complained theyre not moving fast enough and are planning to pick up the pace even more in the coming months.
Among the more eyebrow-raising judges is Charles Goodwin, who has been nominated to the federal bench in Oklahoma. He is the first judicial nominee since 2006 to earn a not qualified label from the American Bar Association, which has screened judicial candidates since the 1950s. But both of his Republican home-state senators, James Lankford and Jim Inhofe, say theyre still confident Goodwin is adequately qualified to serve on the bench and dismissed the ABAs findings.
Hes been a very solid jurist, Lankford said. Were trying to find out the whys [of the ABA rating]. Of course, theyre very secretive about the process and why they make the decisions they do.
more
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/17/trump-judges-nominees-court-picks-243834
dalton99a
(81,516 posts)It deserves a lot more ink
Joe941
(2,848 posts)I've posted on this subject a few times - it is horrible. Sadly it receives very little attention in the media and here as well.
DetroitLegalBeagle
(1,924 posts)The 2016 election will have far reaching consequences for our legal system. It's not just the number of judges, but their age and views that are the problem. And I doubt trump even knows who 10% of these judges are. He is just nominating whoever the GOP wants, and for that reason alone I think they will stick with him to the end. They may lose seats later, but right now they can slant the judiciary and stack it deep with young ideologues who will hold the gavels for decades. Utterly terrible.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)reasonable, decent, this will be a hell hole for you.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)to the Republicans. Some of us tried to shout that out prior to the 2016 election, because it was so dangerous. Sadly, not enough people understood or heard that message. Now, we're faced with the consequences. Will we learn? I hope so.
Joe941
(2,848 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Eminently preventable.
Joe941
(2,848 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)candidate A they will do B.
In 2018.
yep
treestar
(82,383 posts)between the Democrats and the Reupubjicans.