General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRose McGowan temporarily blocked from Twitter after Weinstein tweets
Last edited Thu Oct 12, 2017, 01:04 PM - Edit history (1)
Actress Rose McGowan has been temporarily blocked from Twitter after denouncing the film producer Harvey Weinstein and his collaborators. Reports by The New York Times and the New Yorker published over the last week allege that Weinstein raped three women and sexually assaulted and harassed numerous others, using his influence in the industry to threaten and silence his victims. The Times reported that McGowan herself reached a settlement with Weinstein over undisclosed claims in 1997.
Following the publication of these charges, McGowan has emerged as one of the most vocal denouncers of Weinstein. She has also called out numerous Hollywood figures that allegedly knew of his crimes and said nothing. She tweeted at Matt Damon asking, whats it like to be a spineless profiteer who stays silent? and, on October 10th, more simply: Ben Affleck fuck off. She has also called for the board of the Weinstein Company to be dissolved following the allegations.
Read the rest at: https://www.theverge.com/2017/10/12/16463622/rose-mcgowan-temporarily-blocked-from-twitter-after-weinstein-tweets
Edited to include link to Washington Post article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2017/10/12/rose-mcgowan-blocked-from-twitter-after-tweeting-about-harvey-weinstein-and-ben-affleck/?utm_term=.30d241de069f
with explanation:
Orrex
(63,219 posts)Gee, I wonder.
Response to Orrex (Reply #1)
JonLP24 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)The boycott of Hollywood will be epic.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Orrex
(63,219 posts)I defended you even after Daredevil, and I argued against the haters when you were announced as Batman. But if these charges turn out to be true, then you can can count me out and stuff it all up your Batpole.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Orrex
(63,219 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)him attractive. I think he's an incredibly boring actor. He has no charisma whatsoever.
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)UGH.
hlthe2b
(102,331 posts)uggh. Along with facebook has been a scourge to US society, IMO.
Management for both have just destroyed any possible benefit.
C_U_L8R
(45,014 posts)If they cant block Trump and his fascist bots from Russia,
Then how about the rest of us block Twitter?
Response to C_U_L8R (Reply #5)
JonLP24 This message was self-deleted by its author.
randr
(12,413 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)Why do you think half the board members resigned just before the story broke? They have responsibility: they can be held personally accountable for failure to take care of this matter.
These women need to bring suits against the board of directors: the "protection racket" will never end in these kinds of powerful businesses unless the boards realize it is not in their best interests to protect the abusers.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Don't know if the Weinstein company is one of them.
Response to PoliticAverse (Original post)
JonLP24 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)Sounds like an open secret. The European sex rehab clinics are getting all booked up for the holidays, all we need is Brad and Leo.
demmiblue
(36,875 posts)In a statement, a Twitter representative explained that McGowan's account was "temporarily locked because one of her Tweets included a private phone number, which violates our Terms of Service." The site added, "We will be clearer about these policies and decisions in the future."
The actress revealed the suspension Wednesday night in an Instagram post featuring a message from Twitter saying that she had violated the site's rules. It was initially unclear what tweets had prompted the suspension, and McGowan suggested in the caption that she had been targeted for her tweets criticizing Weinstein and his enablers. "Twitter has suspended me," McGowan wrote in the caption. "There are powerful forces at work. Be my voice."
As it turned out, the offending content was likely a since-deleted photograph McGowan tweeted October 11th. Per The Post, the tweet read, "Anonymously sent to me. They all knew. It starts here." Attached was an image of an e-mail offering to set up a meeting with Bob (ostensibly, Bob Weinstein) at a hotel. However, the image also revealed the full e-mail signature of the sender, including their phone number. As of Thursday morning, following the removal of that image, McGowan's account has been unlocked.
http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/rose-mcgowans-temporary-twitter-suspension-explained-w508492
DU has the same rule, FWIW.