General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhite Privilege is committing the largest shooting in American history and being fondly memorialized
Link to tweet
JoeStuckInOH
(544 posts)then literally "just snapped". All too often you hear that people don't just snap, or that there's a trigger, or they've been radicalized. I think the WAPO's statement is to draw attention to the fact that this guy was normal bloke... right up until he wasn't.
IMO, that's a pretty scary thought: that anyone you know to be completely normal is capable of previously unheard of carnage. Scary.
I do not see them as "memorializing a country music fan".
But some people like read into everything though with their agendas.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)and is indicative of a racial bias/double standard regarding events like this..
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)The Perfect Example of White Privilege at work.
bdamomma
(63,928 posts)Evil and that was it....the shooter was white what more to say. He's a domestic terrorist period. Trump was sticking up to this crowd in Charlottesville, didn't say anything about the girl who was mowed down either by a white guy. What a fucking white supremacist guy.
I am so angry tonite, we have people dying everywhere, and he will not lift a finger for Puerto Rico. What a bastard. I am glad I don't have twitter I would be tweeting him some not so nice tweets.
iluvtennis
(19,880 posts)thbobby
(1,474 posts)If a Muslim or Black had hoarded this many guns, there would be questions like "How did nobody notice all his guns?" or "And his family didn't know?". Nobody would care about what kind of music they liked or what vices they had (unless his vice was drugs, of course).
White supremacist terrorism is by far most dangerous in the USA. I don't pretend to know if this was terrorism, but if a Muslim had done it, it damn sure would be portrayed that way.
He was insane. All countries have insane people. The USA is unique in how easy it is to get deadly weapons. Also, the MSM immortalizes this person. Any wannabe killer could be inspired by the attention such an act brings.
But, HipChick, I agree with you. There is a definite bias in how a White Person is portrayed over how a Muslim, Immigrant, or Black Person would be portrayed.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I just heard CNN (Erin Burnett) discussing the guns and why no one noticed them.
58Sunliner
(4,413 posts)Otherwise it is not appropriate to assume. Then it becomes racial bias. He was shooting at a country music festival. Does that say black/POC crowd? White, domestic terrorist is what he was. How long he had been that way, only he knew. Pathological or people who have a psychotic breakdown don't usually share their violent intentions.
thbobby
(1,474 posts)I was just meaning to point out that terrorism by white supremacists is the major source of terrorism in America. I guess I was kind of rambling in my post.
Aristus
(66,468 posts)how he once smoked marijuana, or once got sent to the principal's office in school. If he were Middle Eastern, the Tweet would be clamoring for a travel ban from the ME.
But because he was white, he was a harmless country music fan until the worst happened.
Skittles
(153,209 posts)ridiculous
Aristus
(66,468 posts)the 10 Most Wanted List.
It just wasn't the first thing brought up.
When Trayvon Martin was murdered, right-wingers twisted themselve into pretzels trying to rationalize how an unarmed teenager walking home and minding his own business, somehow "had it coming". They cited alleged marijuana use, a trip to the principal's office, even the fact that he came from a broken home.
Skittles
(153,209 posts)there's enough racism to find REAL examples
Aristus
(66,468 posts)I don't think the OP for which the Twitterer provided a reply was memorializing the shooter. But it sure made him sound like a neat guy. 'Quiet, like country music and gambling' - you know, the kind of guy you'd want to sit down and have a beer with...
Black victims of extra-judicial killing don't get that kind of hand-in-glove treatment. If the victim's positive qualities are even mentioned in the press, they always seem to be lampshaded by qualifiers such as "Family member says", casting doubt on any objective assessment of the victim's personality.
whathehell
(29,096 posts)It's a simple contrast between how he SEEMED and who he truly was, or what he was and what he became. Period
Baconator
(1,459 posts)You really gotta reach to get it to read like that.
58Sunliner
(4,413 posts)Unless it is a drug or gang related crime and they are known to each other. And there have been several shootings lately.
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)And this is a perfect example of it.
Ilsa
(61,700 posts)was also a psychopath, according to either cnn or msnbc. Did this shooter suddenly become psychopathic? Or has he always been on the edge?
Eliot Rosewater
(31,125 posts)Skittles
(153,209 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,125 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)"Just snapped" would be suddenly snatching up a gun or other weapon and blazing away until you're stopped. This country music fan appears to have had a plan that took a few days to set up,* ending in that hail of bullets on his unsuspecting targets, then killing himself when the authorities arrived.
*He checked into the hotel a few days before the big finish of the music festival. He either checked in with this arsenal of weaponry, ammunition and accessories or (more chillingly to my mind), brought it in piecemeal over the course of those days.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)it was planned...
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)bdamomma
(63,928 posts)picking off people running back and forth from two rooms, yea he was a quiet guy.....
whathehell
(29,096 posts)No one is "memorializing" him...Some seem to see a racial angle in Everything.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)and yet he does this. He has money, a good life, connections w/relatives, a girlfriend. Then this.
Not much different from the contrast of O J Simpson's crimes and his wealthy, privileged life.
It's different, is all. Usually people who do horrible things have some obvious issues, some big problems. Like the Unibomber (a highly intelligent, educated white man...who had a screw loose, apparently, that manifested itself in violence against others).
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)onenote
(42,778 posts)and it's not good.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)or just me..
onenote
(42,778 posts)HipChick
(25,485 posts)She see's the injustice, even if others try to be blind...
melman
(7,681 posts)Is this person's twitter handle.
onenote
(42,778 posts)I'm someone who doesn't think anyone is immune from criticism.
And I'm someone who read the article that supposedly supports the tweet and didn't read it as constituting a "fond" -- meaning affectionate or loving -- recollection of him. I read it as a matter of fact description of what has been learned about him so far. A guy who seemed to blend into the background -- regarded by one neighbor as a good neighbor and by others as "reclusive" or "weird" or a "nothing" or "aggressively unfriendly" -- not exactly terms of endearment. A guy who was a "high stakes gambler." A guy who had no recorded interactions with police.
In other words an article that described what could be learned about him. If you know something that shows that he was in fact a monster before he committed this horrific act, you should let the media know. But otherwise, it is a stretch and then some to suggest that a story that describes what is known about him -- often in unflattering terms -- is describing him "fondly."
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)You've certainly moved your goalposts from your initial indictment of the poster to a rationalization for Chelsea.
Nice work!
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)Edited to add:
Thank you!
CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)...the unarmed 18-year-old murdered by Darren Wilson in Ferguson:
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/25/us/michael-brown-spent-last-weeks-grappling-with-lifes-mysteries.html
Compared to that, this armed killer sounds like some gentle everyman with a pesky, expensive gambling habit.
Why do we need to know what kind of things he liked? That's a move to normalize a killer and invoke sympathy, very similar to the way the media posted pictures of Dylann Roof opening Christmas presents as a boy.
By contrast, black victims are portrayed as having troubled histories and/or criminal pasts, to influence a reader into thinking 'Well, maybe there was a reason they died as they did.'
Ace Rothstein
(3,192 posts)It hasn't even been 24 hours since this tragedy occurred and little has been said about this guy's motivations.
CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)I don't recall articles that rushed to run the picture of Michael Brown as a high-school graduate with a life ahead of him, and quotes from his family saying how much he was loved and missed, and not understanding why his life was taken.
The flipside of your statement is that it hasn't been 24 hours, but we got some comments from the family very quickly.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 2, 2017, 07:21 PM - Edit history (1)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLJtAMRVoAA0t-D?format=jpgA lot about him leading a normal life but brother isn't quoted mentioning his father was on the FBI's 10 most wanted list in the '70s.....& declared a psychopath
eleny
(46,166 posts)MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)Baconator
(1,459 posts)It's a valid observation that there were no, as yet discovered, signs prior to the attack.
The reason you don't usually see this on terror-related attacks is that there is often an observable pattern.
There's plenty to be angry about. No need to make up new stuff.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)that folks seem to try and be blind about - I am glad someone like Chelsea Clinton can see that though..
Baconator
(1,459 posts)... if it was a 65-year-old wealthy upper-middle-class black guy with no overt religious affiliations, no criminal history and no other indications of the pending attack.
You're trying to make the evidence support your already reached conclusion.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)what I see are a lot of folks in denial though
Baconator
(1,459 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)In SOME FOLKS Minds......
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)than speculating about a fictitious black guy to support a conclusion you have already reached?
Baconator
(1,459 posts)... in the aftermath of an attack. It's posted in the OP.
It's reasonable to extrapolate that a minor change wouldn't completely negate the possibility of a similar story being written about a black guy with all of the same unusual (or very usual depending on your POV) characteristics.
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)extrapolation except that isn't how black people are written about. Perhaps in your part of the world there is no difference in how black people and white people doing the same thing are described. I haven't been to that part of the world.
whathehell
(29,096 posts)This gets SO old.
uponit7771
(90,367 posts)Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Skittles
(153,209 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)No one is 'fondly memorializing' this guy.
PatrickforO
(14,593 posts)No warm white privilege fuzzies from me.
'enjoyed country music.'
The sick fuck.
raven mad
(4,940 posts)Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)"Radical White Male Terrorism"
linuxman
(2,337 posts)How was he a radical?
How is this terrorism?
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Stephen Paddock was Radical as he used an EXTREME Condition (An Automatic Rifle - likely more than one), to change an Institution (people enjoying an outdoor concert is an Institution), to change a habit or condition (habit of individuals feeling generally safe at a concert or normally in the condition of feeling safe at a concert).
NEXT....
How is this terrorism? He had 18 Guns/Rifles In His HOTEL ROOM and Used At Least One or More Of Them To KILL and MAME upwards of 2000 People attending an outdoor concert and that was his clear intention. That's Terrorism.
Stephen Paddock, a Privileged White Male, with upwards of 18 guns/automatic rifles, used at least one or more of those rifles to fire into a crowd of upwards of 2000 innocent individuals, attending an outdoor country music concert, using violence to achieve Stephen Paddock's goal of KILLING and MAMING PEOPLE.
Your questions have been answered!
oberliner
(58,724 posts)https://www.thedailybeast.com/drag-queen-anti-gay-terrorist-omar-mateen-was-my-friend
linuxman
(2,337 posts)Pretty damn thick indeed.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)and collecting numerous military style weapons in a state where anyone can do so, so he could work out his inner demons.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)Docreed2003
(16,878 posts)Im a white guy, from the south, that happens to own firearms, that happens to love real country music...frankly Jason Aldean doesnt qualify...but Im a dyed in the wool Democrat and was raised to be the liberal I am today. My grandparents, born in 1901 and 1912 respectively, had two pictures on their walls of political figures: FDR and MLK. FDR, because granddaddy was a sharecropper prior and during the depression. My granny cooked Sunday dinners for our family everyone they worked with and their families...our table was open to all walks of life, even when they insisted on eating outside, granny would scold them and make them sit down at our dinner table. They worked the land like we did, they were our equals, they would have a place at our table. Through FDRs programs, granddaddy was able to transition from sharecropping to owning his own country store. He owned a total of three in his working life. The thing that separated him from others in our TN town at the time, late 40s to mid 60s, his store wasnt segregated. He did that by choice and by his own personal beliefs. The local KKK showed up one night burning torches at granddaddys store demanding he stop serving blacks...I wasnt there and I cant say that its anything more than family legend, but granddaddy walked out on the porch, because they lived in quarters within the store, with a double barreled shotgun and called every one of the assholes out by name and shamed them into leaving his property. During the civil rights era, they supported the movement of MLK in their rural area, in no small part because their best friends Dave and Mattie, were black...it wasnt on a grand scale but they did do their part in their part of the world. When MLK was assassinated, my grandparents hung his photo as a reminder of the ongoing struggle. They were poor country people but they knew and recognized the struggle for equal rights.
My grandparents either watched or listed to the Grand Ole Opry every Saturday night...I grew up with classic country as a part of me...likewise, I spent many hours with Mr Dave and Mrs Mattie..From Mr Dave, I learned the blues: Howlin Wolf, Muddy Waters, Robert Johnson, Aurthur Crudup, Son House, Blind Lemon Jefferson....and on and on...Mrs Mattie would play Motown and Staxx...
Theyre both gone now, as are my grandparents. I know my upbringing is different than most in the South but to paint a broad brush and suggest this is a white guy who liked country music and guns and thats why x..y...z..thats insulting.
This guy was a reprehensible asshole...if he were a POC or a POC who happened to be Muslim, yeah...that would be blown far and wide by the media to further demonize those groups.
If my post is continuing the white privilege promotion, Ill gladly delete it...that is surely not my intention. My point in my long ass rant is to show not all white, country music loving, gun owners are the same...
7962
(11,841 posts)Response to HipChick (Original post)
Post removed
HipChick
(25,485 posts)I respect Chelsea Clinton, its a disgusting you are denigrating her like that
BumRushDaShow
(129,608 posts)Was on a Jury for that.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)GOP-Oligarch, they write their own rules......!
Rilgin
(787 posts)The humanistic response to the recent shooting should be about the horror of mass killings, sympathy for the victims, pleas and discussion to do something about American Society or law that allows this type of shooting to happen. An agenda is making this about race in a newspaper puff piece about what his neighbors say.
NOW FOR THAT COMPARISON IN REAL TERMS ABOUT AN AFRICAN AMERICAN SNIPER NOT YOUR IMAGINATION
An article from one day after they caught Muhammad where they interviewed some people that knew him and said some nice things about him in surprise that he was a sniper because he seemed like a nice guy -- SOUND FAMILAR
From October 25 2004, exactly one day after John Muhammaad (a sniper was caught)
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2002-10-25/news/0210250347_1_mildred-muhammad-john-allen-muhammad-john-lee-malvo/2
QUOTES ON
Ron James, 44, of Kalispell, Mont., said he served with Muhammad for about five years at Ft. Lewis and never saw anything but a good soldier.
"He's no cold-blooded killer," James said. "He was outgoing, friendly, cared about people. He would never talk about hurting anybody. He never used Muhammad, never. I never made the connection until I saw his picture last night, then wham--my eyes popped open and my chin hit the floor.
"His leadership was excellent," James said. "Guys responded well to him. He asked me to do something, I said, `OK, you got it.' He had that way about [him.]"
END QUOTES
This is what the press does 1 day after a shooting, they report what they know from neighbors and family who rarely know the dark side of the shooter (or they might have done something before). Its common newspaper trope to interview the neighbor who says just like they did with the las vegas shooter, "he was a good neighbor" and then says in so many words, you would never imagine he would do that.
So here it is for you. You can stop putting up a straw man imaginary sniper and actually look at articles that ran one day after a real sniper was caught, one who was an actual muslim African American.
Response to HipChick (Original post)
JonLP24 This message was self-deleted by its author.
matt819
(10,749 posts)He's not being "memorialized" as a nice guy.
He's being reported on, and so far there's not much more than quiet, professional gambler, unsociable, had no idea he would do this.
If people had informed the reporters that he seemed weird and they're not surprised to learn he was the killer, then that would have been reported. If his brother saw this coming, then he might have faced the dilemma faced by Ted Kaczynski's brother - do I call the cops. But he didn't. No one did.
If he was black, the tone of the reporting would be different, and that's where the white privilege comes in. And that accusation if fair. But he's not being memorialized.
As for the terrorist tag, I'm on the fence. Without more information about his motivation, I'm not sure the terrorist label can be applied. Unlike the Charleston killer or the killers in Charlottesville or Oklahoma City or Boston. Those killers had fairly well defined (if stupid and evil) goals that I believe fell within the definition of terrorist.
Response to HipChick (Original post)
JonLP24 This message was self-deleted by its author.