General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHere comes the spin...
Why Did the Islamic State Claim the Las Vegas Shooting?
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/10/isis-amaq-las-vegas/541746/
This morning, the Islamic States semi-official news agency, Amaq, took credit for the Las Vegas massacre, which killed 58 and wounded another 515. The likely killer, identified by police as 64-year-old Stephen Paddock of Mesquite, Nevada, was not known to be a supporter of the Islamic State, or indeed a Muslim of any type. For now, the only evidence that the Islamic State was involved is its own assurancefirst a press release announcing that a soldier of the Islamic State executed the concertgoers, and a follow-up for the baffled, explaining that he converted to Islam months ago. The FBI has stated that it doesnt believe the attack was related to international terrorism.
The sun has barely risen on Las Vegas, and there may be blood still slick on the Strip. Speculation about mass shootings in the hours after they occur is not just a fools game but an impatient fools. Evidence will be forthcoming, and these assertions by the Islamic State will be tested against reality. But already I hear a familiar chorus of doubt: The Islamic State will take credit for anything, it says, even hurricanes.
matt819
(10,749 posts)I think it's more like strategic chaos, maybe run by the Russians but certainly abetted by the RW media.
ISIS.
Secret Muslim.
Secret Liberal.
Antifa.
Anticom.
Anti-Trumpster.
Reality is irrelevant.
And we're falling prey to it here on DU already, with posts condemning the killer's religiosity, even though preliminary reports reveal extremely little about him.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,214 posts)Plain and simple.
sinkingfeeling
(51,479 posts)makes them seem more terrifying.