Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Weekend Warrior

(1,301 posts)
1. Trump and his cronies are scum. There is even a "thanks Obama" in the article.
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 11:01 AM
Sep 2017
"It’s a little bit awkward for us to have the federal government on both sides of the case," observed Judge Rosemary Pooler at one point in the oral arguments.

But Justice Department lawyer Hashim Mooppan pressed on anyway, opposing the EEOC, which was still run by an Obama administration holdover when the case first reached the court.

"Employers under Title VII are permitted to consider employees' out-of-work sexual conduct," Mooppan told the judges. "There is a common sense, intuitive difference between sex and sexual orientation."

&quot It's) as conservative as it could possibly get: if having sex with a man is okay for a woman, it has to be okay for a man as well," Greg Nevins of Lambda Legal, tells Newsweek. "You cannot apply a different rule based on gender, according to the law. Apparently, that wasn’t conservative enough for the DOJ."


https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-administration-says-employers-fire-195610268.html

Bleacher Creature

(11,256 posts)
2. Apparently that's what's keeping the country from being great again.
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 11:01 AM
Sep 2017

This is like a nightmare that never ends.

 

Weekend Warrior

(1,301 posts)
4. He is still going from campaign stop to campaign stop saying America sucks.
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 11:02 AM
Sep 2017

Does he know who the President is?

dawg

(10,624 posts)
3. I don't think our country has ever provided adequate legal workplace protections ...
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 11:02 AM
Sep 2017

based on orientation. We need to have explicit federal laws on the books that are not subject to different administrations' "interpretations".

CrispyQ

(36,470 posts)
5. The most depressing thing I heard this week was HRC, in one of her many interviews,
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 11:03 AM
Sep 2017

stating that our Constitution has no mechanism for dealing with a stolen election. So here we sit, putting our hope & faith in rule of law, when the other side flaunts their breaking of that law. They (who?) may take down the Con & some of his administration, but the rot that is the GOP - it will still be there. If you think they won't come up with someone worse than the Con, you're wrong. They will. Just look at what happened in AL this week.

I am just sick at what I see happening in this country. Sick. And horrified. And so heartbroken.

Crying...

dsc

(52,162 posts)
7. To be fair the court case was actually about something slightly different
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 11:12 AM
Sep 2017

whether sex in the 1964 Civil Rights Act encompasses sexual orientation. That is, at least in theory, different from whether such discrimination is a good thing or ought to be legal. That said, I think this administration would also oppose a law protecting gays.

Doreen

(11,686 posts)
8. I remember during trump's campaign there was
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 11:50 AM
Sep 2017

this gay guy who was venomously supporting trump and saying how trump was going to protect the gay community. I wonder how he feels now?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So it's okay to fire gays...