Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,098 posts)
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 09:19 AM Sep 2017

The inaction on the Jones Act showed the real Donald Trump.

When it came down to a choice between wealthy ship owners and 3 million American citizens on the island of Puerto Rico, Trump was bewildered. He was going to do nothing until the PR became so strong that he could see it hurting him personally. He then decided to lift the ban on shipping temporarily. But, we got to see the real Donald Trump.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The inaction on the Jones Act showed the real Donald Trump. (Original Post) kentuck Sep 2017 OP
Bewildered?? Trump has his nanny next to him. I would this Kelly would riversedge Sep 2017 #1
My guess is that Trump is very familiar with the Jones Act. kentuck Sep 2017 #3
um.. had not thought of that. riversedge Sep 2017 #13
he waived if for texas and florida with hardly a thought.... spanone Sep 2017 #2
I don't think it's quite that simple. Turbineguy Sep 2017 #4
It is my understanding that they register as Panamanian and Bahamian ships to escape taxes? kentuck Sep 2017 #5
Yes. Turbineguy Sep 2017 #6
I am no authority on the subject but... kentuck Sep 2017 #7
The Jones act is extremely complex Turbineguy Sep 2017 #8
Who are the owners of these big ships? kentuck Sep 2017 #9
The owners are corporations. Turbineguy Sep 2017 #10
Oh yeah! kentuck Sep 2017 #11
Yes. Turbineguy Sep 2017 #12

riversedge

(70,239 posts)
1. Bewildered?? Trump has his nanny next to him. I would this Kelly would
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 09:27 AM
Sep 2017

just say--The jones act needs to be wavered NOW! But I do not know what Kelly said or if he gave advice. What is bewildered is that trump said PR was an island with a big ocean around it (that itself was!!). Anyway, it makes it all the more imperative that ships get to and are able to drop off supplied without big fees attached. But Trump and his advisors did not make that connection.

kentuck

(111,098 posts)
3. My guess is that Trump is very familiar with the Jones Act.
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 09:29 AM
Sep 2017

He may be invested in some of these ships?

Turbineguy

(37,337 posts)
4. I don't think it's quite that simple.
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 09:31 AM
Sep 2017

The Jones act has a lot of supporters and detractors. A lot of Democratic Lawmakers are staunch supporters (Defense of the Nation and all that). A lot of Republicans are against the Jones Act. Corporate "wealthy ship owners" would flag out, dump the Unions and pay lower wages.

McCain is against the Jones Act because of his Navy upbringing. Some (not all) Navy types resent the higher wages.

But yes, Trump could have acted faster. As it is, he can extend the waiver. But I see this delay as just normal Trump incompetence.

kentuck

(111,098 posts)
5. It is my understanding that they register as Panamanian and Bahamian ships to escape taxes?
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 09:37 AM
Sep 2017

Primarily?

Turbineguy

(37,337 posts)
6. Yes.
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 09:47 AM
Sep 2017

And Liberian.

All of those registries are run out of an office in Reston VA. Same office, different filing cabinets, so I'm told. There's also the Marshall Island Registry. A special situation.

kentuck

(111,098 posts)
7. I am no authority on the subject but...
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 09:51 AM
Sep 2017

...would the amount of taxes be so great as to prevent them from not wanting to help in such a humanitarian effort? I get the feeling there is a lot more going on with this "Jones Act" than any of us know?

Turbineguy

(37,337 posts)
8. The Jones act is extremely complex
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 10:00 AM
Sep 2017

and a lot of competing interests are involved. Shipyards don't want ships built overseas. Owners don't want to pay higher U.S. shipbuilding costs. Sailors' Unions want jobs. Owners want to pay sailors less. There are government subsidies to shipyards and owners with complicated rules. Ships are required to be suitable for Defense Dept use.

It goes on.

This Jones Act argument is a strawman. The Jones Act has nothing to do with what's going on in Puerto Rico. It does not help and it does not hinder. But republicans who want to get rid of the Act can hardly be expected to let a tragedy take place without somehow taking advantage of it, can they?

http://bridgedeck.org/actionnetwork/MLA-Maria-JonesAct.pdf?link_id=0&can_id=1ba06146d0137a8e3ebb18b934178df1&source=email-the-maritime-labor-alliance-supports-the-citizens-of-puerto-rico&email_referrer=email_241118&email_subject=the-maritime-labor-alliance-supports-the-citizens-of-puerto-rico

Turbineguy

(37,337 posts)
10. The owners are corporations.
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 10:07 AM
Sep 2017

But I believe McConnell has some interest in foreign flag shipping through his wife.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The inaction on the Jones...