Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
Fri Sep 22, 2017, 06:28 PM Sep 2017

Should liberal states form their own health insurance system?

I am thinking blue states like California, Oregon, Washington, New Mexico, Maryland, Delaware, Conneticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Vermont. Form their own giant insurance pool and certify insurance companies that meet specific guidelines to sell there. Other states can join as long as they agree to the following;

1. Affordable care for everyone.
2. Premium assistance for poor people up to Medicaid level.
3. No pre-existing condition exclusions. Everyone MUST be covered at the same rate for the level of policy.
4. No shit policies, i.e. super high deductibles, restricted coverage, lifetime caps can be sold in those states.

For residency:
Person must have lived in the state for one year or was born there.

I am not in insurance guy. But I feel that blue states need to decouple themselves from states like mine (Florida) and red states that constantly vote against their own best interests.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should liberal states form their own health insurance system? (Original Post) Blue_true Sep 2017 OP
CA tried for a few months last Spring/Summer BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #1
A collective of states bring in more people. Blue_true Sep 2017 #3
do we still have to cover the trumpers? samnsara Sep 2017 #2
california oregon washington n hawaii. nt msongs Sep 2017 #4
Whatever, certainly a collective. Blue_true Sep 2017 #5
Thats a interesting idea ismnotwasm Sep 2017 #6
That is what I was thinking. nt Blue_true Sep 2017 #9
There is a provision in murdercare that forbids the states to enact single payer. Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #7
That's a really smart idea. I'd love to see that. Or whatever universal healthcare structure Squinch Sep 2017 #8

BigmanPigman

(51,627 posts)
1. CA tried for a few months last Spring/Summer
Fri Sep 22, 2017, 06:36 PM
Sep 2017

but there wasn't enough info financially to allow it to be considered for very long. They felt that it would fail if it were rushed too quickly. They need to do a lot more work on the details before they will introduce it with enough confidence for it to realistically pass unfortuanately.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
3. A collective of states bring in more people.
Fri Sep 22, 2017, 06:48 PM
Sep 2017

As more people get included, that can drive down premiums for everyone. Plus, I think I remember reading that blue states were healthier in general, so the entire pool would be healthier, if that conclusion follows.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
5. Whatever, certainly a collective.
Fri Sep 22, 2017, 06:50 PM
Sep 2017

Modern technology should make setting up and running the collective from a SYSTEMS standpoint easy. Cost dynamics such as start up costs would need to be worked out first, as alluded to be a post above.

ismnotwasm

(42,008 posts)
6. Thats a interesting idea
Fri Sep 22, 2017, 06:51 PM
Sep 2017

I’m in Washington—one of the the states with a ACA success story. What if we formed a four or five state co-op model for healthcare?

Squinch

(51,004 posts)
8. That's a really smart idea. I'd love to see that. Or whatever universal healthcare structure
Fri Sep 22, 2017, 07:08 PM
Sep 2017

would work, not necessarily single payer.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should liberal states for...