Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mobeau69

(11,156 posts)
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 10:40 PM Sep 2017

John Dean just told Don Lemon that experienced federal prosecutors don't

Last edited Tue Sep 19, 2017, 07:05 AM - Edit history (1)

throw the word "indictment" around lightly. He said that if they did mention "indictment" then Manafort has likely already received a target letter and if he doesn't flip he probably will be indicted.



Fixed.

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Dean just told Don Lemon that experienced federal prosecutors don't (Original Post) mobeau69 Sep 2017 OP
Can 45 pardon him? BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #1
There's always that. mobeau69 Sep 2017 #2
For federal crimes he may have committed of course he could. n/t PoliticAverse Sep 2017 #4
Is treason pardonable? world wide wally Sep 2017 #9
A few people have actually received Presidential pardons for treason. n/t PoliticAverse Sep 2017 #10
The only real restriction on the pardon power is that it cannot interfere with impeachment. tritsofme Sep 2017 #13
Confederate Soldiers were pardoned. nt Gore1FL Sep 2017 #15
He couldn't pardon him for a conspiracy that he himself was involved in. nt pnwmom Sep 2017 #14
Sure he could. n/t PoliticAverse Sep 2017 #18
This is legally disputed sharedvalues Sep 2017 #19
That clause means the President can't cancel an impeachment... PoliticAverse Sep 2017 #21
That clause means what SCOTUS interprets it to mean sharedvalues Sep 2017 #22
I don't think there's any reasonable doubt what that clause means in regards to impeachment. n/t PoliticAverse Sep 2017 #24
"Likely SCOTUS will have to interpret it." We've seen how that works when... bagelsforbreakfast Sep 2017 #28
If he did, he'd be guilty of obstruction of justice. Also, his Presidential pardon power pnwmom Sep 2017 #20
"If he did, he'd be guilty of obstruction of justice." - that could very well be true and would PoliticAverse Sep 2017 #23
I agree. He would open himself to charges. Then we can speculate if Trump can "self-pardon". Midnight Writer Sep 2017 #25
In a Washington Post opinion piece yesterday law professor Lawrence Tribe included the following... PoliticAverse Sep 2017 #34
One of the stories tonight mentioned NY indictment unc70 Sep 2017 #6
We know Mueller has been working closely with NY AG SChneiderman on Trump state corruption stuff Amaryllis Sep 2017 #8
That is where I get confused, between the states' and federal government's jurisdiction. BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #12
Just depends on the type of crime. E.g., murder is local, but it's Federal if Civil Rights are WinkyDink Sep 2017 #36
This isn't the point. Manafort may answer the question, what did Rump know Hortensis Sep 2017 #35
Flip baby flip! flamingdem Sep 2017 #3
Right now I just hope he isn't slipped Russian poison Corvo Bianco Sep 2017 #5
Wow, you never know flamingdem Sep 2017 #7
He won't flip. Jakes Progress Sep 2017 #11
No pardon for State of NY indictments unc70 Sep 2017 #16
Then they better get NY charges Jakes Progress Sep 2017 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author StevieM Sep 2017 #17
Oops, sorry. I was a teacher and should know better but my tablet BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #27
Actually, I screwed up. I replied to your post rather than the OP. StevieM Sep 2017 #30
OK, I feel better. I have been screwing up so much lately. BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #32
We are navigating a tough society these days. Don't be too hard on yourself. StevieM Sep 2017 #33
Not to worry! It's a sign o' the times! WinkyDink Sep 2017 #37
Sing like a canary, Manafort Hekate Sep 2017 #26
Is it just me or does Manafort dress like Gotti? n/m bagelsforbreakfast Sep 2017 #29
This is a good post and very informative. Unfortunately, I am not a normal human being. StevieM Sep 2017 #31

mobeau69

(11,156 posts)
2. There's always that.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 10:46 PM
Sep 2017

Normally, you'd think that would be the last straw but there doesn't seem to be any last straws for the orange a-hole.

tritsofme

(17,399 posts)
13. The only real restriction on the pardon power is that it cannot interfere with impeachment.
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 12:13 AM
Sep 2017

Which is a political, not criminal process

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
19. This is legally disputed
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 12:58 AM
Sep 2017

Constitution just says "Except in cases of Impeachment".

What does that mean? Likely SCOTUS will have to interpret it.


We are in crazy times

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
21. That clause means the President can't cancel an impeachment...
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 01:22 AM
Sep 2017

If Congress for example were impeaching a Federal Judge the President couldn't cancel the impeachment
process by issuing the judge a pardon.

What some people have a question about is whether a President could pardon themself - the Nixon administration
even got the DOJ to issue an opinion on the matter - the opinion was no he can't, you can read it here: https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/opinions/1974/08/31/op-olc-supp-v001-p0370_0.pdf .

pnwmom

(108,994 posts)
20. If he did, he'd be guilty of obstruction of justice. Also, his Presidential pardon power
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 01:21 AM
Sep 2017

doesn't extend to state prosecutions. It's very likely that some of Manafort's crimes could be prosecuted as state crimes in NY, which has strong financial laws.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
23. "If he did, he'd be guilty of obstruction of justice." - that could very well be true and would
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 01:29 AM
Sep 2017

be a reason why a President shouldn't issue a pardon to a co-conspirator. Also a co-conspirator that accepted such a pardon would lose their ability to refuse to testify by invoking their 5th amendment right and could then be forced to testify against the President which would be another good reason for a President not to issue a pardon to co-conspirator.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
34. In a Washington Post opinion piece yesterday law professor Lawrence Tribe included the following...
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 02:42 AM
Sep 2017
The framers suggested one solution to the prospect of such abuse. During a Virginia debate over whether to ratify the Constitution, George Mason worried that the president might “pardon crimes which were advised by himself.” James Madison replied that a president who did so could be impeached.

From: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-presidential-pardon-power-is-not-absolute/2017/09/18/09d3497c-9ca5-11e7-9083-fbfddf6804c2_story.html?utm_term=.7213caa25945

unc70

(6,119 posts)
6. One of the stories tonight mentioned NY indictment
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 10:55 PM
Sep 2017

Can't remember where I heard or saw that. Could have only been through DU or on CNN or MSNBC.

I believe it was in connection to the Ukraine money laundering.

Amaryllis

(9,525 posts)
8. We know Mueller has been working closely with NY AG SChneiderman on Trump state corruption stuff
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 11:23 PM
Sep 2017

and that can't be pardoned.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
36. Just depends on the type of crime. E.g., murder is local, but it's Federal if Civil Rights are
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 03:31 AM
Sep 2017

involved.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
35. This isn't the point. Manafort may answer the question, what did Rump know
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 03:18 AM
Sep 2017

and when did he know it? And/or a number of other questions dangerous to Rump and all those associated with him, including potentially Pence.

To keep Rump from being able to by buy silence through pardon, Mueller's and the NY state AG's investigations have teamed up. Remember, Rump cannot pardon state charges.

They have this covered.

Response to mobeau69 (Original post)

BigmanPigman

(51,627 posts)
27. Oops, sorry. I was a teacher and should know better but my tablet
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 01:53 AM
Sep 2017

auto spellchecker always leaves or creates many errors. I often find that I have to to triple check my writing (even with gmail) yet many errors still get passed over.
I looked at your post and do not see through and throw in it. Did I screw up again? It is late and I have had a very anxiety filled day with the ACA repeal efforts and calling congressmembers.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
30. Actually, I screwed up. I replied to your post rather than the OP.
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 02:14 AM
Sep 2017

They are the one who misplaced the homonym.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
33. We are navigating a tough society these days. Don't be too hard on yourself.
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 02:20 AM
Sep 2017

Half the country screwed up by voting for Donald Trump.

At least you are doing you part by frequenting the Democratic Underground and contributing to the liberal dialogue.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
31. This is a good post and very informative. Unfortunately, I am not a normal human being.
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 02:15 AM
Sep 2017

I cannot help but tell you that you misplaced a homonym. You wrote "through" instead of "throw."

Just giving you a heads up.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»John Dean just told Don L...