Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AnnieBW

(10,458 posts)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 11:28 PM Jul 2012

Why Did the USOC Go With Ralph Lauren, Anyway?

Why on earth did the USOC go with the snooty Ralph Lauren-designed uniforms anyway? Under Armor is an American, minority-owned sports clothing company whose factory is in Baltimore! I guess they'd rather go with a label that's synonymous with the 1% than one that's synonymous with actual SPORTS APPAREL.

But then, that's just me.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Did the USOC Go With Ralph Lauren, Anyway? (Original Post) AnnieBW Jul 2012 OP
I did not know Under Armor was minority owned, they would have been a much better choice, SoutherDem Jul 2012 #1
i like rl stuff in general but arely staircase Jul 2012 #4
I am not sure they are minority owned either...it's a guy named Kip and his brother. nt LaydeeBug Jul 2012 #2
Ralph Lauren's logo is the biggest thing on the uni. Octafish Jul 2012 #3

SoutherDem

(2,307 posts)
1. I did not know Under Armor was minority owned, they would have been a much better choice,
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 11:37 PM
Jul 2012

But, then again I don't buy Ralph Lauren anyway.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
3. Ralph Lauren's logo is the biggest thing on the uni.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 11:41 PM
Jul 2012


Overall, it adds to the sort of authoritarian look he wants to communicate.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Did the USOC Go With ...