General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary Democrats are the heart and conscience of America.
"Hillary Democrats are the heart and conscience of America. They cast a vote for compassion, inclusion, justice, and equality the values that make America great. It is a travesty that they continue to be treated with disdain and disrespect."
https://verrit.com/hillary-democrats-are-the-heart-and-conscience-of-america/
read the whole thing
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)melanctha
(24 posts)leftstreet
(36,117 posts)Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)It's fact based.
leftstreet
(36,117 posts)Why else would we need to 'get used to see it a lot?'
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)Would she?
Ninsianna
(1,349 posts)sit down and shut up while non-Democrats who keep failing to lead and get anything done and are applauded when they so much as fart?
Hillary shouldn't stop, we have a whole lot of shit to fix, and we need leadership to do that.
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)Knowing Hillary it is ignorant to think anyone or anything would ever make her stop. Ilove that about her
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)uh huh.
QC
(26,371 posts)They're what plants crave.
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)electrolyte websites/message boards?
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)'nuff said.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)was like a personal invitation. I'm a liberal, progressive Democrat, and if my enemies are anxious to shut it down, I'm in.
As in, Ohhh!
Demsrule86
(68,715 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)Was Daou a candidate?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I'm not confused at all. I know exactly who you are.
QC
(26,371 posts)VermontKevin
(1,473 posts)leftstreet
(36,117 posts)Nothing wrong with it if that's what people want
It's just, uh...kinda late
VermontKevin
(1,473 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)about us.
WE ARE the descendants of the founders of and carriers of the flame of our democratic republic. All men are created equal and entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Government of, by and for the people. Equality and justice for all.
That's us. We are an incredibly wide coalition of the peoples of America, not perfect but in all eras, no matter what party label, always the ones who have worked to advance the right and wellbeing of We the People.
We don't soak up vicious lies like people continually fighting withdrawal from Kool-Aid, we don't manufacture fake hurricanes or believe in them, we don't serve malignant, antigovernment kleptocrats, we don't try to use government as a weapon against other Americans, and we don't elect depraved, mentally disordered buffoons.
It's starting with Hill because we're far from getting over what happened, when people think Democratic Party these days they think of her, and it's way past time to talk about the real person, to let people know who she is, sparkle, dreams, normal real-person warts, and all.
Our top candidate in 2016 was actually not just an extremely hardworking, knowledgeable, competent, liberal, progressive Democrat, but a church woman who prides herself on her ethics (really!) and whose desire to serve took her remarkably far beyond the progressive church activities she participated in as a teenager. How many people know that?!
It's way, way past time to be start talking about our leaders as the real people they are, about all who are no longer visible as real people behind the wall of poisonous mud thrown up by opponents (including US), and about our achievements and goals with pride.
brer cat
(24,625 posts)jalan48
(13,901 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)they're likely to be disappointed if they expect to find it on any site Hillary endorses.
She's really, eternally an enthusiastic policy wonk.
"Stop cheering, and listen! Solar cells on every home, and this is how we'll do it:..." As we all know, she's kind of the Anti-Cult, but definitely my kind of candidate.
George II
(67,782 posts)Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)It annoys me when people say she needs to shut up. I've been with Hillary decades and well enough to know it is IGNORANT to think she will stop and go away. Not until her death! She's worked her buns off for our country, even getting Bill elected after a 12 year republican reign. Hillary won't stop, no matter what the men with hair buns say.
MineralMan
(146,338 posts)last November. In 2020, they'll be voting for someone else, probably. They are not Hillary Democrats. They are just Democrats. Democrats vote for Democrats.
No candidate owns Democrats, nor are Democrats tied to just one candidate.
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)I've been following her since before she met Bill
melman
(7,681 posts)You've been following her since the 60s? How exactly is that?
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)Bradshaw3
(7,533 posts)This need for some to tie themselves to one politician whoever that may be - Hillary, Bernie, even Obama - is not the way to bring about real change. This is supposed to be a democracy, where we the people have control over our government. Celebrity type worship of politicians is counterproductive.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)all are ok, but Hillary Democrats are not, of course. I wonder what the difference is? ...I just can't put my finger on it.
Bradshaw3
(7,533 posts)I wrote that hero worship of ANY politician is not good - then listed three MALE politicians including Obama and Bernie who should not be worshipped - and you turn that into me saying that "Obama Democrats, Bernie Democrats are OK".
WOW. What I wrote was not that hard to follow. But everything MUST be misogyny, right? Even when it's not. Try rereading what I wrote and then respond with some thought and reason not just an untrue smear.
JHB
(37,163 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,386 posts)awesomerwb1
(4,268 posts)Hillary Democrats, Berniecrats. You're either a Democrat or a fan club member of either of the two.
If you were too stupid to vote for Dump or not vote Democratic, F you. Now we have a great chance to do good things in 2018. If we don't wise up, we'll blow it -again- and the country, the world and the planet will be worse off. THINK.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)I supported Hillary but I'm a Democrat, not a Hillary Democratic. There is too much s/hero worship around here.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,900 posts)"Hillary Democrats, Berniecrats. You're either a Democrat or a fan club member of either of the two." Well put. I voted for Hillary and was happy to do it. I was originally a Bernie supporter but never a "fan." I supported him only because his positions were closer to what I believed. One thing I do not believe in is hero-worshipping politicians - any of them, ever. Hillary would have been a fine president and it is becoming more and more obvious that her loss was a disaster for the country. But to set her on a pedestal and blather on about "Hillary Democrats" being the only true and worthy Democrats is ridiculous and destructive. We have to work together or we're screwed.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)but I'll continue to be an FDR Democrat, thank you very much
MineralMan
(146,338 posts)He was a good President for his time, but not in every way. He did a number of things for which he would be roundly criticized and condemned had he done them today.
Most people know only partial information about FDR, because he lived before their times. He was not a Christ-like figure. He was not what would be called a true progressive today.
FDR was President at a specific time in history. He did well for that time. If he were alive today and ran for President on his platform and record from his time as President, he would lose.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Response to MineralMan (Reply #12)
Name removed Message auto-removed
MineralMan
(146,338 posts)and some of them are far from how we see things now. Again, I doubt that you really know all there is to know about FDR. If you did, you would understand what I'm saying.
As for having read enough from me, I promise I won't get mad if you put me on Ignore.
George II
(67,782 posts)....and the world out of the worst depression in history. But many of the things he implemented (not all, I'll say that before I get bashed about Social Security and FICA, among others) not only wouldn't fly but would be out of place in 2017 America.
Expecting Rain
(811 posts)to beat the fascists and he opposed the nativist isolationists of his day.
FDR was an optimist who worked to unite the country and he opposed the populist demogogues that tried to divide our country through fear-mongering, pessimism, scapegoating, and appeals to class-warfare.
FDR opposed populists like Huey "Share the Wealth/Every Man A King" Long who preached simple solutions to complex problems and relied on demonizing the rich. FDR called Huey Long the 2nd most dangerous man in American politics (Douglass McArthur being number one).
FDR worked to liberalize trade and to undo the protectionist economic isolation of his populist opponents.
FDR believed in the ideals of economic liberalism and embraced reforms designed to save our economic system from populist attacks on both fronts.
For all these stands FDR was attacked as a plutocratic capitalist by the populist-nativists of his day.
I'm proud to be an FDR Democrat.
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)C'mon. For his time he was alright but not perfect
JHan
(10,173 posts)FDR was born of wealth, and his populist impulses are vastly overstated today. Many don't know the full story of FDR, which doesn't diminish what he managed to accomplish but selectively creating myths about him don't provide a complete picture of who he was or the times he lived.
Response to JHan (Reply #59)
Name removed Message auto-removed
melanctha
(24 posts)not allowing jews safe harbor... The list is mind boggle ling. The status of white (northern European) Americans improved immensely. America has never been an all white nation. What else? Surely you jest. Progessivism , if that's what you want to call it, was built on white supremacy. Democrats have evolved to include all Americans. We are better together.
JHan
(10,173 posts)A cudgel to bash modern democrats, that's the motivation behind the myth making.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)odd times around here..
Caliman73
(11,752 posts)FDR and the politicians that supported his agenda are responsible for a good deal of the social infrastructure we have today, but they were just the politicians of their time with all of the failings. They did some pretty awful things too.
Democrats are people who support all or most of the party's policy platform. That is all. Democrats as a party, try to pick the politicians that best promote the party and the platform. When people start to identify with one person as the "real" then the party becomes irrelevant and the policies become irrelevant.
We want a politician that can garner support because of the way they articulate Democratic Values, but the problem with many Democratic voters is that if it isn't the exact person they like, the superstar, then they get upset and refuse to participate.
melman
(7,681 posts)And one of the greatest presidents of all time. It's popular to bash him here but that doesn't make it right.
It's not right. It's bullshit.
MineralMan
(146,338 posts)I am pointing out that who he was was right for the times. Not everything he did was progressive. It's important to look at him in an honest, factual way and not to exaggerate who he was, focusing only on some of the things he did.
Reality and hindsight are often two different things.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,131 posts)know much about him, nothing wrong with doing that.
He was the greatest in many ways, which is why the GOP changed the rules to get rid of him, but using his name to now somehow support the idea of supporting this person or that, makes no sense given the vast differences in time.
And the reality that race is NOW an issue, and it wasnt then. White folks made sure it wasnt.
Demsrule86
(68,715 posts)However, he did not stop the lynching, he incarcerated the Japanese and he was against public unions. He was still a great president for his times. But we can not limit ourselves to his views and policies as we live in a different time.
Ninsianna
(1,349 posts)It's popular to idolize these old white men, while conveniently forgetting what they got up to and ignoring their crimes. It's not right and it's bullshit.
JI7
(89,279 posts)disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)folks worked up about me saying I'm an "FDR Democrat".. which is more of and idea in the broad sense of how he steered our country in the right direction with progressive policie (of that time, yes), they called him a socialist and in some ways that was an apt descriptions.. he fought the robber barons, the "economic royalist" as he put it of his time.. we now refer to them as corporatists and unfortunatley we have been losing that class war for a long time..
So, even with his warts his legacy lives on, conservatives love to chop down that legacy - they say, he did little to end the Great Deppression, they say his policies extended it.. it's bullshit and I don't expect to see that crap here on DU, but I guess as time passes, people need new monikers to call themselves & if u wish to be called a "Hillary Democrat" then by all means have at it.. I'll stick with FDR/ Johnson/ JFK... for now
Demsrule86
(68,715 posts)But his legacy is the past, it is not a road map for the future.
TeapotInATempest
(804 posts)From the link:
"Verrit was met with an entirely predictable response from Clintons detractors: rage, abuse, bullying, mockery. Within an hour of her tweet, a denial-of-service attack took the site down temporarily. Message board forums sprouted with users openly plotting to hack the site. Tech writers with an anti-Clinton bent focused on everything except Verrits stated purpose: To provide rigorously vetted information and analysis for people who are marginalized and threatened whenever they speak up."
There is no rational reason for this response. None at all.
Go ahead and tell me how there is no misogyny involved. I'll be waiting.
CloudsInMyCoffee
(94 posts)There, fixed it for you!
Demsrule86
(68,715 posts)not physically or mentally handicapped) have no heart nor a conscience.
CloudsInMyCoffee
(94 posts)Demsrule86
(68,715 posts)Because if you didn't vote for Clinton you have no soul nor do you have a heart.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Demsrule86
(68,715 posts)Anyone who voted for Hillary is included in the Hillary Democrats...in my opinion, a person who did not vote for Hillary Clinton should fuck off. I am not including you...as of course you voted for the Democratic candidate ...just in general.
melman
(7,681 posts)you don't get to decide that. Unless of course someone made you the Boss of all Democrats. Did they? Are you the boss?
Eliot Rosewater
(31,131 posts)Nobody is "deciding" that, just common sense.
Demsrule86
(68,715 posts)chairs on the Titanic...
Demsrule86
(68,715 posts)are not Democrats...and have no heart and no soul.
meadowlander
(4,408 posts)So, I suspect, did hundreds of thousands of other Democrats who would have rather seen a different candidate, but accepted the outcome of the primary.
And now we're not part of "the heart and conscious of America" anymore? Get stuffed.
What exactly is this supposed to be accomplishing, other than self-congratulatory fluffing for Hillary supporters and driving a deeper wedge into the left?
Demsrule86
(68,715 posts)as those who voted for Hillary...as for getting 'stuffed'...I think you should read TOS once again...no reason to post that to me.
MrsCoffee
(5,803 posts)I hope you don't fall off that horse, it's a long way down.
Demsrule86
(68,715 posts)keep health insurance, to save Transgender rights, the civil rights act,help kids with college debt,not create more wars and to end income inequality to name a few reasons why we voted for Hillary Clinton...the Democratic candidate.
haveahart
(905 posts)It seems to be a place where Democrats can post ideas for helping people. Hope it can keep the hackers and infiltrators away.
jalan48
(13,901 posts)samnsara
(17,650 posts)Response to AngryAmish (Original post)
m-lekktor This message was self-deleted by its author.
Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)It's no wonder the human species is going extinct. We can't grow beyond tribalism. My tribe yay! Your tribe eat shit and die.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,131 posts)who has been called the enemy here by mainstream Democrats?
Now I can point to lots of progressives who routinely attack Democrats, but not otherwise.
Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)Plenty of registered Democrats here on DU have been branded "the enemy" for their support of one or another person or policy that puts them at odds with some other DU tribe.
So don't claim that I said something I didn't say, and then condemn for for saying it when I didn't.
Demsrule86
(68,715 posts)Democratic nominee...one can certainly consider that those 'Democrats' who didn't vote for her made themselves the enemy. I would not consider them Democrats.
dembotoz
(16,864 posts)0rganism
(23,975 posts)if the analogy fits...
mythology
(9,527 posts)I voted for Clinton in the GE (I didn't vote for any of the candidates in the primary because I saw very little difference between the candidates and was happy to vote for any of them) and I've never felt attacked for that.
Perhaps the ones claiming to be picked on aren't being objective about how they treat others. For example there have been loads of posts from Clinton primary supporters blaming Sanders for Clinton losing. That has provoked a response, but it's hardly fair to pretend those supporters are being picked on since they were the aggressors.
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)When has Bernie or his supporters accepted blame for his loss?
LisaM
(27,843 posts)and the primary, they (we, I guess) seem to be the ones asked to do the most soul-searching and make the most concessions now.
I don't know much about the Verrit site, but I will say having to self-flagellate over supporting a candidate who beat both her male opponents by millions of votes is getting old.
If we don't address the electoral process, this will never end.
Gothmog
(145,667 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)I'm more of an Al Franken kind of Democrat.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)in my life. Always the Dem. Didn't care who they were, the D was what counted, never sat out an election either. I'm not a Hillary Democrat, wouldn't want to be one. I consider any Democrat and any person who votes and sides with the Democratic platform and values, registered as a Dem or an Indy to be the heart and conscience of America.
meadowlander
(4,408 posts)It's not that hard is it?
Autumn
(45,120 posts)But I sure as shit am not about to refrain from voicing my opinion on their actions if I disagree with those actions.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)all american girl
(1,788 posts)RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Look she wasn't my first choice. I don't need an award. It was a pretty easy choice against that con man in the WH.
Response to AngryAmish (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Stinky The Clown
(67,832 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,900 posts)Beacool
(30,253 posts)Bill was the first person I ever voted for president. They were different from the old people I had previously seen in the WH. They were young, energetic and Hillary was the smartest first lady I had seen in my lifetime. I still think that she's one of the smartest people around. I like her, she is a survivor and is still standing after years of personal and professional attacks.
Therefore, I don't give a flying fig who doesn't like her. To me, she'll always be one of the best presidents that we never had.