Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

A HERETIC I AM

(24,380 posts)
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 06:21 PM Aug 2017

Aviation enthusiasts; Beginning of the end for the A380? Singapore A/L quietly parks first one. edit

Singapore Airlines has quietly parked the first A380 to enter service, Tail number 9V-SKA as they have decided not to continue the lease. The aircraft is only 11.3 years old, delivered to Singapore Airlines October 15th, 2007 and entered service 10 days later. Aircraft is leased from the German firm dr-peters Group who does not have another lessee lined up as yet. The aircraft last flew on June 10/11 from Heathrow to Singapore where it remains.


By comparison, the longest serving 747 air frame and the 25th unit off the assembly line has just been finally grounded after 47 years of service.

In my opinion, the A380 represents a MASSIVE miscalculation by Airbus, as they had high hopes for sales of over 500 units. Only 317 have been ordered and of those, 214 have been delivered. The largest user is Emirates with 96 in service. To my knowledge of the issue from the limited reading of the aviation press that I do, they picked up no new net orders for the super jumbo at the recent Paris Airshow.

By comparison (granted, they've been in production since the 60's) Boeing has delivered 1533 747's of numerous variants with 18 on order and yet to be delivered.

FWIW, Boeing stock has been on a tear recently, up 80% in the last year and is seen by many in the financial press as being one of the primary drivers of the DJIA.

Just to be clear, I don't by any means intend to bash Airbus and promote Boeing. Airbus stock is also up YTD and over the last 52 weeks, and this post is not intended as a recommendation to buy, nor a solicitation to purchase ANY stock of any kind. It is merely for those interested in airplanes.


Edit; Just found this;

Airbus to deliver first US Built A320 this week.

https://www.bizjournals.com/wichita/news/2017/08/22/airbus-to-deliver-first-u-s-built-a320-this-week.html
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Aviation enthusiasts; Beginning of the end for the A380? Singapore A/L quietly parks first one. edit (Original Post) A HERETIC I AM Aug 2017 OP
They're building the A-320 right down here in Mobile. trof Aug 2017 #1
Yup. Drove right by on I-10 yesterday. A HERETIC I AM Aug 2017 #3
I've heard the hardest part if finding workers who can pass drug screening. trof Aug 2017 #13
Good. cloudbase Aug 2017 #17
Though they are not comparible, the 787 and 737 Ryano42 Aug 2017 #2
Indeed. A HERETIC I AM Aug 2017 #4
No, they're more in tune with what airlines want. Warren DeMontague Aug 2017 #5
Don't knock Greyhound, yortsed snacilbuper Aug 2017 #24
You're right. Sorry, my experience is still probably colored by the last time I took one Warren DeMontague Aug 2017 #25
Too bad. I like big planes. Warren DeMontague Aug 2017 #6
I'm not that fond of them Major Nikon Aug 2017 #19
I'm probably over-nostalgic for my own childhood, which was back when flying didn't suck. Warren DeMontague Aug 2017 #20
Still is fun Major Nikon Aug 2017 #21
yeah. Did that once. Warren DeMontague Aug 2017 #22
I wouldn't read much into the fate of a single early-production aircraft of any type Sen. Walter Sobchak Aug 2017 #7
I don't read too much into it... A HERETIC I AM Aug 2017 #8
Singapore Airlines is still taking on new A380s Sen. Walter Sobchak Aug 2017 #11
+1 BannonsLiver Aug 2017 #16
In the data biz, we call one a "statistically insignificant sample". brooklynite Aug 2017 #9
LOL....indeed. A HERETIC I AM Aug 2017 #10
I suspect the original Singapore Airlines A380s will find their way to IAG. Sen. Walter Sobchak Aug 2017 #12
The number isn't the significance Major Nikon Aug 2017 #23
I've flown on the A-380 a couple of times DFW Aug 2017 #14
Twice as many engines as is currently the style. trof Aug 2017 #15
I love that aircraft also.... pangaia Aug 2017 #26
Maybe Trump can cut a deal to get one on the cheap. cloudbase Aug 2017 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author jg10003 Aug 2017 #27

A HERETIC I AM

(24,380 posts)
3. Yup. Drove right by on I-10 yesterday.
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 07:01 PM
Aug 2017

I understand getting hired is tough, as they have understandably high standards and requirements, but I would venture to say that working at that plant would be one of the best places to work in Alabama.

Ryano42

(1,577 posts)
2. Though they are not comparible, the 787 and 737
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 06:53 PM
Aug 2017

Are more in tune with what the customers want; much less to operate, with the 787 even longer range and can operate at more airports

An A380 to be loaded quickly takes multiple jetways.

The 737 will be the standard in it's class for a long time.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
5. No, they're more in tune with what airlines want.
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 07:04 PM
Aug 2017

Namely, cheap-ass to operate greyhounds in the skies with a single aisle that can be kept closed for the entire flight, as the "seat belt" sign is kept on for purposes of crowd control and no one can get up to pee.

Flying sucks. "what customers want" at this point is to be sedated for the entirety of an experience that just keeps getting worse.

yortsed snacilbuper

(7,939 posts)
24. Don't knock Greyhound,
Sat Aug 26, 2017, 08:56 PM
Aug 2017

I live in Pittsburgh and have taken the greyhound bus to NY City, D.C., Baltimore, Cleveland and Philly.

They have wifi and stop at the rest area for a break.

If someone starts acting up the bus driver calls the state police.

You can sleep in a nice big seat, I usually leave around midnight and get their early in the morning.

you have a better class of people riding the bus.

When you buy a ticket nobody can bump you.

I get a military discount.

https://www.greyhound.com/

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
25. You're right. Sorry, my experience is still probably colored by the last time I took one
Sat Aug 26, 2017, 10:04 PM
Aug 2017

From Los Angeles to San Francisco, maybe in 1987 or so, and I had a drunk hells angel passed out in my lap the entire way.

I'm glad to hear it has improved. Flying has only gotten worse, no question.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
19. I'm not that fond of them
Sat Aug 26, 2017, 07:02 PM
Aug 2017

They take too long to load and unload. They are limited by fewer airports than can handle them. Since they are designed for long haul flights there's just too many people in too small of a space for too long. I didn't like flying on the 747, the L-1011, or the DC-10 for the same reasons.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
20. I'm probably over-nostalgic for my own childhood, which was back when flying didn't suck.
Sat Aug 26, 2017, 07:08 PM
Aug 2017

Plus, I was smaller, so it wasn't as cramped (and they hadn't tried to squeeze twice as many people into the same space) ... still, I can remember when flying was cool, even fun.

And I was a huge airplane nerd, as a kid. Could identify all of them.

 

Sen. Walter Sobchak

(8,692 posts)
7. I wouldn't read much into the fate of a single early-production aircraft of any type
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 07:22 PM
Aug 2017

When Air Canada unloaded part of their Embraer 190 fleet the oldest of the aircraft, the tenth Embraer 190 ever built went straight to the scrapper. The first planes off the line of any type are usually overweight, extensively reworked and non-standard. Boeing struggled to find customers for early 787s, and a few never found customers.

I am not terribly pessimistic about the Airbus A380, the major airports of the world aren't getting less congested or NIMBYs less cantankerous.

A HERETIC I AM

(24,380 posts)
8. I don't read too much into it...
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 07:32 PM
Aug 2017

I just find it interesting that they have decided not to renew the lease and have parked such an expensive capital investment.

I don't share your lack of pessimism, however. Production and deliveries have slowed to 7 a year for the current 12 month period and the aftermarket for these very large aircraft seems to have dried up. This could all change, of course.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_A380#Market

 

Sen. Walter Sobchak

(8,692 posts)
11. Singapore Airlines is still taking on new A380s
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 08:20 PM
Aug 2017

The reason the plane has been idled is because there is extensive work to be done before it is returned to lessor. If they can replace an oddball which is probably a nuisance to their dispatchers and maintenance with a new standard aircraft why wouldn't they?

The A380 is something you as an airline either need or you don't. The need it fulfills isn't going away and there isn't a suitable alternative. The American preference for high-frequency with smaller aircraft doesn't work globally where access to major global airports is at an absolute premium.

A HERETIC I AM

(24,380 posts)
10. LOL....indeed.
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 07:45 PM
Aug 2017

And it is, no doubt.


BUT! (you knew this was coming, didn't you?)

The fact that their orders have dried up, coupled with a flat or dead secondary market does not bode well for this aircraft.

 

Sen. Walter Sobchak

(8,692 posts)
12. I suspect the original Singapore Airlines A380s will find their way to IAG.
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 08:22 PM
Aug 2017

Airbus articulating a freighter conversion strategy would also be helpful.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
23. The number isn't the significance
Sat Aug 26, 2017, 07:19 PM
Aug 2017

What's significant is you have an readily available airframe and zero demand during a time when the airline business is booming and other airframes can't be made fast enough.

DFW

(54,445 posts)
14. I've flown on the A-380 a couple of times
Sat Aug 26, 2017, 05:08 PM
Aug 2017

It was OK, but I really didn't notice some huge difference between flying on it or a 747. Of course, I never flew one of the prestige airlines on one of their long-haul routes, either. I imagine the interior set-up and the service is something else if you fly Emirates to Australia via Dubai. I only took it from Paris to New York or Washington, and it was just another plane.

trof

(54,256 posts)
15. Twice as many engines as is currently the style.
Sat Aug 26, 2017, 05:14 PM
Aug 2017

I really liked the Boeing 727.
THREE, count 'em THREE engines.
Our own ground power (APU), and our own stairs.
No need for jet ways or rollup stairs.
We were pretty much self-sufficient.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
26. I love that aircraft also....
Sat Aug 26, 2017, 10:11 PM
Aug 2017

and from all I understand, so did the pilots..
that and the MD-80 series...

Response to A HERETIC I AM (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Aviation enthusiasts; Beg...