General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAviation enthusiasts; Beginning of the end for the A380? Singapore A/L quietly parks first one. edit
Singapore Airlines has quietly parked the first A380 to enter service, Tail number 9V-SKA as they have decided not to continue the lease. The aircraft is only 11.3 years old, delivered to Singapore Airlines October 15th, 2007 and entered service 10 days later. Aircraft is leased from the German firm dr-peters Group who does not have another lessee lined up as yet. The aircraft last flew on June 10/11 from Heathrow to Singapore where it remains.
By comparison, the longest serving 747 air frame and the 25th unit off the assembly line has just been finally grounded after 47 years of service.
In my opinion, the A380 represents a MASSIVE miscalculation by Airbus, as they had high hopes for sales of over 500 units. Only 317 have been ordered and of those, 214 have been delivered. The largest user is Emirates with 96 in service. To my knowledge of the issue from the limited reading of the aviation press that I do, they picked up no new net orders for the super jumbo at the recent Paris Airshow.
By comparison (granted, they've been in production since the 60's) Boeing has delivered 1533 747's of numerous variants with 18 on order and yet to be delivered.
FWIW, Boeing stock has been on a tear recently, up 80% in the last year and is seen by many in the financial press as being one of the primary drivers of the DJIA.
Edit; Just found this;
Airbus to deliver first US Built A320 this week.
https://www.bizjournals.com/wichita/news/2017/08/22/airbus-to-deliver-first-u-s-built-a320-this-week.html
trof
(54,256 posts)A HERETIC I AM
(24,380 posts)I understand getting hired is tough, as they have understandably high standards and requirements, but I would venture to say that working at that plant would be one of the best places to work in Alabama.
trof
(54,256 posts)cloudbase
(5,525 posts)I was on a project for six months at Bender Shipyard. I wouldn't let those people fix a bicycle.
Ryano42
(1,577 posts)Are more in tune with what the customers want; much less to operate, with the 787 even longer range and can operate at more airports
An A380 to be loaded quickly takes multiple jetways.
The 737 will be the standard in it's class for a long time.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,380 posts)The 737 is a remarkable airplane.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Namely, cheap-ass to operate greyhounds in the skies with a single aisle that can be kept closed for the entire flight, as the "seat belt" sign is kept on for purposes of crowd control and no one can get up to pee.
Flying sucks. "what customers want" at this point is to be sedated for the entirety of an experience that just keeps getting worse.
yortsed snacilbuper
(7,939 posts)I live in Pittsburgh and have taken the greyhound bus to NY City, D.C., Baltimore, Cleveland and Philly.
They have wifi and stop at the rest area for a break.
If someone starts acting up the bus driver calls the state police.
You can sleep in a nice big seat, I usually leave around midnight and get their early in the morning.
you have a better class of people riding the bus.
When you buy a ticket nobody can bump you.
I get a military discount.
https://www.greyhound.com/
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)From Los Angeles to San Francisco, maybe in 1987 or so, and I had a drunk hells angel passed out in my lap the entire way.
I'm glad to hear it has improved. Flying has only gotten worse, no question.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)They take too long to load and unload. They are limited by fewer airports than can handle them. Since they are designed for long haul flights there's just too many people in too small of a space for too long. I didn't like flying on the 747, the L-1011, or the DC-10 for the same reasons.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Plus, I was smaller, so it wasn't as cramped (and they hadn't tried to squeeze twice as many people into the same space) ... still, I can remember when flying was cool, even fun.
And I was a huge airplane nerd, as a kid. Could identify all of them.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Provided you have your own airline
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I see the appeal.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)When Air Canada unloaded part of their Embraer 190 fleet the oldest of the aircraft, the tenth Embraer 190 ever built went straight to the scrapper. The first planes off the line of any type are usually overweight, extensively reworked and non-standard. Boeing struggled to find customers for early 787s, and a few never found customers.
I am not terribly pessimistic about the Airbus A380, the major airports of the world aren't getting less congested or NIMBYs less cantankerous.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,380 posts)I just find it interesting that they have decided not to renew the lease and have parked such an expensive capital investment.
I don't share your lack of pessimism, however. Production and deliveries have slowed to 7 a year for the current 12 month period and the aftermarket for these very large aircraft seems to have dried up. This could all change, of course.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_A380#Market
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)The reason the plane has been idled is because there is extensive work to be done before it is returned to lessor. If they can replace an oddball which is probably a nuisance to their dispatchers and maintenance with a new standard aircraft why wouldn't they?
The A380 is something you as an airline either need or you don't. The need it fulfills isn't going away and there isn't a suitable alternative. The American preference for high-frequency with smaller aircraft doesn't work globally where access to major global airports is at an absolute premium.
BannonsLiver
(16,470 posts)brooklynite
(94,745 posts)Last edited Fri Aug 25, 2017, 09:20 PM - Edit history (1)
A HERETIC I AM
(24,380 posts)And it is, no doubt.
BUT! (you knew this was coming, didn't you?)
The fact that their orders have dried up, coupled with a flat or dead secondary market does not bode well for this aircraft.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)Airbus articulating a freighter conversion strategy would also be helpful.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)What's significant is you have an readily available airframe and zero demand during a time when the airline business is booming and other airframes can't be made fast enough.
DFW
(54,445 posts)It was OK, but I really didn't notice some huge difference between flying on it or a 747. Of course, I never flew one of the prestige airlines on one of their long-haul routes, either. I imagine the interior set-up and the service is something else if you fly Emirates to Australia via Dubai. I only took it from Paris to New York or Washington, and it was just another plane.
trof
(54,256 posts)I really liked the Boeing 727.
THREE, count 'em THREE engines.
Our own ground power (APU), and our own stairs.
No need for jet ways or rollup stairs.
We were pretty much self-sufficient.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)and from all I understand, so did the pilots..
that and the MD-80 series...
cloudbase
(5,525 posts)For the new AF1, y'know.
Response to A HERETIC I AM (Original post)
jg10003 This message was self-deleted by its author.