Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Goodheart

(5,324 posts)
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 08:38 AM Aug 2017

Arguments stupid people use

These are some of my favorites:

"Cars kill more people than guns. Should we ban cars, too?"

"There is no overpopulation problem. Everybody on Earth could fit inside Texas".

"The Constitution doesn't say 'separation of church and state'".





74 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Arguments stupid people use (Original Post) Goodheart Aug 2017 OP
Check, check, and check. Iggo Aug 2017 #1
Why should I pay for your health insurance? Freddie Aug 2017 #2
This! smirkymonkey Aug 2017 #16
Also why do they assume they are paying treestar Aug 2017 #29
Middle class get most of the tax cuts? Do you have a reputable source for that statement? stopbush Aug 2017 #38
I didn't say cuts treestar Aug 2017 #70
"You shouldn't have children if you can't afford them" Freddie Aug 2017 #41
Exactly. treestar Aug 2017 #71
Middle class pays taxes IronLionZion Aug 2017 #47
Try to define middle class, and you'll find out most people aren't. haele Aug 2017 #57
Right wingers don't look at it that way though treestar Aug 2017 #72
oh, i'm sorry, did i *cough*ebola*cough* on you? unblock Aug 2017 #31
My response is "I have a highly contagious deadly disease. What's it worth to you rurallib Aug 2017 #40
Post removed Post removed Aug 2017 #3
My favorites: Oneironaut Aug 2017 #4
"Its just a theory" hack89 Aug 2017 #5
Arggghhh... Also, "Not all scientists agree that global warming is real!" because 1 scientist out of Oneironaut Aug 2017 #8
+1 Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2017 #53
The church once disagreed with Galileo marylandblue Aug 2017 #56
Good point Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2017 #60
Evolution is just a theory, therefore God exists. Goodheart Aug 2017 #9
Or Creationism deserves "equal time" with Evolution Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2017 #54
Also, the idea that creationism should be taught in science classes in school. Oneironaut Aug 2017 #62
Yup Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2017 #64
I always ask, "Which creation story"? PassingFair Aug 2017 #65
Crucial, "therefore the EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN GOD EXISTS" All other gods are somehow anneboleyn Aug 2017 #68
Atheists have no moral foundation, therefore God exists. Goodheart Aug 2017 #7
Also - "Why don't you just go and start killing everybody? Morals only come through God!" Oneironaut Aug 2017 #10
Meanwhile their moral foundation gives instructions on how to properly sell your kids Major Nikon Aug 2017 #22
i love the "morality flows only from god" argument. unblock Aug 2017 #34
A conscience is that little voice inside you that says... Wounded Bear Aug 2017 #35
Anything that ends with "therefore god exists" you can be assured is sack of hammers stupid Major Nikon Aug 2017 #20
Good thread. HughBeaumont Aug 2017 #6
"National Socialism has SOCIALISM in it! Socialists are Nazis!" Oneironaut Aug 2017 #11
Like the meme says, they're going to be REALLY confused when it comes to Buffalo Wings. HughBeaumont Aug 2017 #12
It's one thing to have policy disagreements with bright people Goodheart Aug 2017 #13
The only reason we don't see wings on buffalo IronLionZion Aug 2017 #14
It's funny, but they kind of taste like chicken. smirkymonkey Aug 2017 #17
That's how they convinced people to eat strange foods IronLionZion Aug 2017 #32
An excellent essay to follow on to the "Hitler was a lefty" discussion ET Awful Aug 2017 #21
The enemy has trained dogs to sniff out menstrual blood IronLionZion Aug 2017 #15
Guns dont kill people; people kill people. Major Nikon Aug 2017 #18
But they find it much harder to do without the 🔫 Le Gaucher Aug 2017 #23
The same brilliant argument can be applied to nuclear weapons Major Nikon Aug 2017 #24
Guns have killed more people than nuclear weapons have. Le Gaucher Aug 2017 #25
Guns dont kill people;... Major Nikon Aug 2017 #27
Bullets kill people IronLionZion Aug 2017 #33
Bullets don't kill either, sucking chest wounds do Major Nikon Aug 2017 #36
Second ammendment should be shat/ pissed upon. Le Gaucher Aug 2017 #26
Why are you so afraid of guns? Major Nikon Aug 2017 #37
An armed society is a polite society IronLionZion Aug 2017 #44
Suitcase nukes for everyone! Major Nikon Aug 2017 #46
Guns don't kill people, but they sure help Freddie Aug 2017 #42
This one? lpbk2713 Aug 2017 #19
The Republicans freed the slaves and treestar Aug 2017 #28
Yup, exactly what I was going to say... mreilly Aug 2017 #51
You know what's funny about that last one? HughBeaumont Aug 2017 #61
How about Podkayne K Aug 2017 #30
"My kids are grown. Why should I have to pay for public schools?" mcar Aug 2017 #39
I don't use the library, so the government should pay for my books Major Nikon Aug 2017 #45
My public school teacher gave me the answer to that marylandblue Aug 2017 #73
"You libtards have time to comment because you don't work" Freddie Aug 2017 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author marylandblue Aug 2017 #58
Here's one: "I voted for Stein because Hillary had a lock on my state." NurseJackie Aug 2017 #48
Good one! mcar Aug 2017 #74
If you're an atheist and use our money that states "In God We Trust" Goodheart Aug 2017 #49
Huuuummm... RobinA Aug 2017 #50
I worked for CPS as an investigator Phoenix61 Aug 2017 #63
The Stupid People's Argument Playbook: no_hypocrisy Aug 2017 #52
I'm pro-life, BarbaRosa Aug 2017 #55
More . . . . HughBeaumont Aug 2017 #59
"They're only words... they have no power over you unless you let them." LanternWaste Aug 2017 #66
If we remove statues of Robert E Lee Buzz cook Aug 2017 #67
"Nazis were liberal"; "MLK was a Republican"; "the U.S. is a republic, not a democracy"... VOX Aug 2017 #69

Iggo

(47,552 posts)
1. Check, check, and check.
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 08:40 AM
Aug 2017


EDIT: I saw a new version of that first one involving cyclists and pedestrians to argue against helmets. Funny and sad.

Freddie

(9,265 posts)
2. Why should I pay for your health insurance?
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 08:44 AM
Aug 2017

I usually shoot back - why should I pay for the bloated military and never ending wars?

treestar

(82,383 posts)
29. Also why do they assume they are paying
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:17 AM
Aug 2017

anything. Middle class gets most of the tax breaks - the top 5% are the ones paying, as shown in that way they were the ones getting the taxcut in Trumpnoncare.

You should not have children if you can't afford them is another one like that. Then logically they should be against the child tax credits and deductions - they don't need them as they can afford the kids - and as if no one's income ever changes for the worst.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
70. I didn't say cuts
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 06:51 PM
Aug 2017

By the time the middle class deductions and credits are considered, are these right wingers really actually paying in to the system, so they can sanctimoniously declare that they are paying for the poor people's health insurance, etc.?

We are talking about right wingers and their snotty claims that they are working to pay for food for (lazy non-job having) people.

Freddie

(9,265 posts)
41. "You shouldn't have children if you can't afford them"
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:42 AM
Aug 2017

But you're opposed to contraception, right?

treestar

(82,383 posts)
71. Exactly.
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 06:53 PM
Aug 2017

I have dedected that in the end, what they really want to do is make sexual activity a privilege of people with about as much money as they have. You see them saying "shut your legs" to women - it's that they want them to remain celibate, because they are too poor for this "privilege."

IronLionZion

(45,442 posts)
47. Middle class pays taxes
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:50 AM
Aug 2017

the wealthiest people hire people to find as many deductions, credits, subsidies, loopholes, etc. as possible. Wealthy people are the ones who lobbied to get most of the deductions put into our tax code. They write off most everything as a business expense. They have ways of making out like bandits while reporting a business loss on paper.

haele

(12,653 posts)
57. Try to define middle class, and you'll find out most people aren't.
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 11:59 AM
Aug 2017

Middle class isn't "median income", middle class is a sociologically defined lifestyle, whether they're making "median income" or six figures. And most middle class people make six figures.

Middle class people don't take standard deductions on their taxes, they itemize.

Here's the rule of thumb or "accepted" idealization of a middle class household:

A middle class family owns their house (mortgage and tax deductions). A middle class income earner might own their own business or works as a professional somehow (business deductions). A middle class income earner typically has a degree or requires training that must be maintained - or sends their kids to school (student loan/educational loan deductions/child care deductions). A middle class income earner tends to have a retirement plan (retirement savings deductions) and long-term investment tax shelters (more deductions).

A middle class income earner will make whatever deductions they can pre-tax, to lower their income to a more median wage earner where they might be able to take advantage of tax credits to offset the income as well as the itemized deductions. Most middle class households end up paying taxes on stated incomes that are at least a quarter less than they actually make as "take home", and a lot of their income is deferred or set aside for specific expenses that are also tax deductible later on in life - set aside in educational funds, health savings accounts, and various types of trusts.

The ability to set aside at least half your income after the basic food/clothing/shelter/utilities/transportation/insurance bills and other household or profession debts are paid tends to set the demarcation of working class to middle class.

And most people who can put half their income aside for entertainment and/or savings also know how to drop their tax liabilities to a level that they can deduct a large amount of that "extra money" and not pay as much for the privilege of using the public resources and infrastructure to support the lifestyle their income provides for them - unlike most working households whose income basically just pays the bills every month and leaves very little left over.

Most economists identify the middle class - if they can agree on the metrics - as starting with the top 15 - 10% of income wage earners in this country. The wealthy start at the top 5%.
Everyone else is either identified as "average taxpayer" - working class, working professionals (my bracket), working poor, or poor. The group of wage earners who can't afford to set aside enough savings for interest earnings to start kicking in. Who live paycheck to paycheck, with maybe only 10% left over after all the bills are paid, who depend on credits and the standard deductions rather than itemizing and deferring to lower their tax liabilities in April; who depend on their refunds to be able to "break even" on their outstanding debts, or if they have been able to keep their budgets manageable, replace an appliance or make that one repair they've been putting off because they've just not been able to save the money over the year.


Haele

treestar

(82,383 posts)
72. Right wingers don't look at it that way though
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 06:55 PM
Aug 2017

They are mostly middle class themselves, temporarily embarrassed millionaires, who should not have to pay for anyone else's health care. I just question if the math shows they really are.

They will also rant on about how the rich pay more in taxes than the not-rich do (didn't that latest snobby chick say so?). So we are supposed to feel guilty that they may pay for something to benefit the poor, who haven't "earned" it the way the rich did.

unblock

(52,224 posts)
31. oh, i'm sorry, did i *cough*ebola*cough* on you?
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:23 AM
Aug 2017

if only for infectious diseases, everyone should want everyone to have health care.

rurallib

(62,415 posts)
40. My response is "I have a highly contagious deadly disease. What's it worth to you
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:41 AM
Aug 2017

not to catch it?"

Response to Goodheart (Original post)

Oneironaut

(5,494 posts)
4. My favorites:
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 08:44 AM
Aug 2017

- You can't prove that God doesn't exist. God exists!

- Global warming is a hoax. Look at all of the snow outside!

- White supremacists - The Bible says that we should hate Jews! (Seriously)

- Transgender people are draining military resources and morale! They're purposely going into the military to get sex changes!

- An armed society is a polite society (because there's nothing better than ethics based solely on fear, right?)

hack89

(39,171 posts)
5. "Its just a theory"
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 08:46 AM
Aug 2017

"I just shoveled a foot of global warming" even though it is a logical result of warmer global temperatures.

Oneironaut

(5,494 posts)
8. Arggghhh... Also, "Not all scientists agree that global warming is real!" because 1 scientist out of
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 08:50 AM
Aug 2017

5000 disagrees.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
53. +1
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 11:31 AM
Aug 2017

Because clearly that ONE scientist holding a contrary opinion matters more than nearly everybody else.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
60. Good point
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 12:28 PM
Aug 2017

Stepped into that one..........

Of course, we're not talking about scientists vs. scientists with Galileo

Goodheart

(5,324 posts)
9. Evolution is just a theory, therefore God exists.
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 08:51 AM
Aug 2017

I love the "therefore God exists" arguments.

Here's a great resource for them:

[link:http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/GodProof.htm|

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
54. Or Creationism deserves "equal time" with Evolution
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 11:33 AM
Aug 2017

as though both are competing, empirical, equally valid theories

Oneironaut

(5,494 posts)
62. Also, the idea that creationism should be taught in science classes in school.
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 12:47 PM
Aug 2017

There is zero evidence of creationism, yet the RWNJs act like it's a "competing theory" with evolution. It's not a scientific theory at all! No scientist (minus a few outliers, maybe) actually thinks creationism is a valid theory. There is as much evidence for creationism as there is that the Odyssey really happened as described in the story.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
64. Yup
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 01:01 PM
Aug 2017

There is no empirical (i.e. scientific) evidence to substantiate creationism, however wingnuts still repeatedly demand to have it taught as though it has some basis in scientific fact.

PassingFair

(22,434 posts)
65. I always ask, "Which creation story"?
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 01:12 PM
Aug 2017

The Egyptian god Atum masturbating and spitting out humans?

Never really goes beyond that question.

anneboleyn

(5,611 posts)
68. Crucial, "therefore the EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN GOD EXISTS" All other gods are somehow
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 03:50 PM
Aug 2017

disqualified from this "proof." Honestly these people have never even thought through this argument, and they never have a response for it as AT BEST it's an argument for deism, meaning some god may exist. There is nothing in it that justifies the existence of their god vs. gods such as Shiva and Krishna, the Buddha, Odin, Zeus, the Great Spirit, etc etc.

I have seen many debates between atheists and Christians (usually evangelicals who read "proof" from the Christian bible during the debates) who will make ridiculous arguments about how a moth turning green (whatever -- take your pick) is PROOF that god exists. They are frequently allowed to get away with the fundamentally stupid and incorrect notion that such "proof" proves that the Christian god of the Christian bible exists, and created everything they see, instead of having it pointed out to them that even if one agrees that some moth turning x color proves god there's no reason it proves their god.

Oneironaut

(5,494 posts)
10. Also - "Why don't you just go and start killing everybody? Morals only come through God!"
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 08:51 AM
Aug 2017

The idea that we don't need a sky fairy watching us 24/7 to be good people is totally foreign to them.

unblock

(52,224 posts)
34. i love the "morality flows only from god" argument.
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:29 AM
Aug 2017

so, i'm supposed to trust you to be a moral person after you tell me that it's all contingent on your continued belief in something no one can see, hear, smell, touch, taste, or prove? and that if at any moment you can decide it doesn't exist then there's nothing stopping you from murder, rape, theft, etc.?

Goodheart

(5,324 posts)
13. It's one thing to have policy disagreements with bright people
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 09:02 AM
Aug 2017

and you might think that that other position would be stupid to implement because of its consequences, but some arguments can only come from stupid people.

IronLionZion

(45,442 posts)
15. The enemy has trained dogs to sniff out menstrual blood
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 09:54 AM
Aug 2017

so we should not allow trans soldiers (even though most trans people of both genders don't menstruate).

Someone in some IT call center has an Indian accent, therefore brown people are from other countries and can't possibly have been born in America.

Even though the census tells us 4 million US citizens have South Asian ancestry, every person you come across with South Asian ancestry is one of the 40,000 H-1bs from South Asia, and not one of the 99% who are US citizens. Don't let our American accents and passports fool you.

Angry white males who run over protestors with their cars are just hard workers trying to get home to feed their kids but these damn lazy worthless liberals keep getting in the way.

If someone is shot by the cops or arrested and throw in prison, they obviously did something wrong and deserved it. Just obey the law and you won't be shot.

 

Le Gaucher

(1,547 posts)
25. Guns have killed more people than nuclear weapons have.
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:10 AM
Aug 2017

And both should be banned.

Cops should not have guns either. Give them batons like british cops

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
27. Guns dont kill people;...
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:15 AM
Aug 2017

People have killed more people than guns have.

The obvious solution is to ban people. Nuclear weapons can help with this.

IronLionZion

(45,442 posts)
33. Bullets kill people
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:28 AM
Aug 2017

guns only get them going really fast. So it's not the gun's fault you loony liberal.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
36. Bullets don't kill either, sucking chest wounds do
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:37 AM
Aug 2017

If people didn't have guns, they would just use lawn darts and pinking shears.

 

Le Gaucher

(1,547 posts)
26. Second ammendment should be shat/ pissed upon.
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:14 AM
Aug 2017

All guns should be confiscated and recyleds into door knobs .. Because the the Lord knows we all need door knobs.

IronLionZion

(45,442 posts)
44. An armed society is a polite society
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:47 AM
Aug 2017

Just like Somalia and Afghanistan. Everyone has guns, loves God, hates gays, and nobody is mean to each other over there.

Billy Bob with his guns will defend us against tyranny and defeat our own military with their drones and missiles and satellites should they ever turn against us.

Freddie

(9,265 posts)
42. Guns don't kill people, but they sure help
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:44 AM
Aug 2017

Saw this on a bumper sticker years ago. They probably removed it for fear of vandalism.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
28. The Republicans freed the slaves and
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:15 AM
Aug 2017

the Democrats were the slaveholders (so apparently today the Democrats are still the racists)

The Democrats were the racists in the 60s (so that's why more black people support them now).

Protestors are people who don't have jobs. Right wingers never protest since they have to go to work.

 

mreilly

(2,120 posts)
51. Yup, exactly what I was going to say...
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 11:26 AM
Aug 2017

... which is why I keep gleefully reminding them: "How many KKK and white supremacists and Nazis voted for Hillary? Can you name a single one? I'll be waiting."

Waiting forever, that is.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
61. You know what's funny about that last one?
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 12:32 PM
Aug 2017

Both groups are at the Inauguration, for instance.

The one I hear a lot from the Teahad during these gatherings is "GET A JOB YOU BUMS!"

I respond back "YOU'RE IN THE EXACT SAME PLACE AND TIME I'M IN, ASSHOLE! What's YOUR excuse??"

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
73. My public school teacher gave me the answer to that
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 09:01 PM
Aug 2017

Would you rather those kids stand in front of your house with no money, no job and nothing to do?

Freddie

(9,265 posts)
43. "You libtards have time to comment because you don't work"
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:46 AM
Aug 2017

This one pisses me off more than any other. All my friends are liberal, we ALL work and don't expect "government handouts".

Response to Freddie (Reply #43)

RobinA

(9,893 posts)
50. Huuuummm...
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 11:24 AM
Aug 2017

He's a successful business man, he can certainly run the country.

He's rich, so he doesn't need money from lobbyists, he will do what is right.

*I* grew up with abusive parents and managed to turn out right.

My company did away with our pensions 20 years ago, so why should ______ have pensions?

Phoenix61

(17,004 posts)
63. I worked for CPS as an investigator
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 12:50 PM
Aug 2017

A lot of the parents would tell me their parents beat them and they turned out all right. I'd tell them, well, I talked to your children at school and I'm here now asking you questions you have to answer, how well is it working for you now? Always made them pause.

no_hypocrisy

(46,102 posts)
52. The Stupid People's Argument Playbook:
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 11:28 AM
Aug 2017

Logical Fallacies.

Instead of effectively proving their premises to be valid, they rely on distractions from the argument, logical fallacies.

Look at this site and recognize some of the more popular techniques to obfuscate the fact that they can't prove what they're saying is true:

https://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/eng207-td/Logic%20and%20Analysis/most_common_logical_fallacies.htm

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
66. "They're only words... they have no power over you unless you let them."
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 01:57 PM
Aug 2017

"They're only words... they have no power over you unless you let them."

Many, many mean-spirited people use that particular bit of idiocy to better rationalize their own ugly behavior, and pretend ignorance of what "mere" words have done to humans throughout our history...

Buzz cook

(2,471 posts)
67. If we remove statues of Robert E Lee
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 03:15 PM
Aug 2017

Will we then remove statues of Washington?

Banning Muslims is about our security.

"I have the best words"

VOX

(22,976 posts)
69. "Nazis were liberal"; "MLK was a Republican"; "the U.S. is a republic, not a democracy"...
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 03:58 PM
Aug 2017

Anything about "social justice warriors" sticks in my craw as well.

"John F. Kennedy was a conservative." Which obviously is why he once stated, "I'm proud to say I am a liberal."

"A rising tide floats all boats." Bullshit.

"Ronald Reagan won the Cold War." Again, bullshit. The USSR went broke.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Arguments stupid people u...