Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stonepounder

(4,033 posts)
Wed Aug 16, 2017, 10:28 PM Aug 2017

DOJ demand for info regarding visitors to anti-Trump website goes to court.

TruthOut has an article regarding the suit and countersuit over release of ALL info about everyone who visited a particular web site that helped coordinate anti-Trump demonstrations.

Department of Justice's Demand for Information on Dissenters Goes to Court

http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/41629-department-of-justice-s-demand-for-information-on-dissenters-goes-to-court

Interesting post and no paywall. I would quote from the article, except for the following at the end of the article:

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

So, not wanting to run afoul of copyright issues, I am not including any quotes except for the article title, but if you are interested, follow the link.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DOJ demand for info regarding visitors to anti-Trump website goes to court. (Original Post) Stonepounder Aug 2017 OP
You can quote 3 paragraphs on DU w/o copyright issues emulatorloo Aug 2017 #1
Yeah, that's what I normally do, but due to the tag at the bottom of the article Stonepounder Aug 2017 #2
I did a thread about how sneaky Sessions was in securing this bullshit warrant: VermontKevin Aug 2017 #3
I saw that post. Stonepounder Aug 2017 #4
Heads up to everyone...this WILL continue to a problem. dixiegrrrrl Aug 2017 #5

Stonepounder

(4,033 posts)
2. Yeah, that's what I normally do, but due to the tag at the bottom of the article
Wed Aug 16, 2017, 10:58 PM
Aug 2017

I decided to err on the side of caution.

Stonepounder

(4,033 posts)
4. I saw that post.
Wed Aug 16, 2017, 11:02 PM
Aug 2017

He went to a retired, unassigned, ancient judge, who probably doesn't even know how to Tweet. Glad to see they are fighting back!

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
5. Heads up to everyone...this WILL continue to a problem.
Thu Aug 17, 2017, 02:06 PM
Aug 2017

I urge people to use a VPN AND a private window ( firefox has that option) to surf. No footprints.
A good vpn will keep zero records.

Really concerned that Russia and China are now outlawing VPNs.
As long as we are a Russian vassal state, Sessions will try anything.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DOJ demand for info regar...