General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsthe lazy ass media is calling bain 'a war of words'...
illegality? pfffft....
-------------------------
2012 campaign enters a new phase, as Obama and Romney rachet up their attacks on each other
President Obamas campaign has spent many months trying to portray Mitt Romney as an unprincipled flip-flopper, a panderer to right-wing extremists and a greedy business executive. Then this week the ante was upped when one Obama aide suggested that Romney may be something worse: a potential felon.
The latest charge, made by deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter in a conference call with reporters, provoked immediate outrage from the Romney campaign, which, in the course of demanding an apology, called the president of the United States a habitual liar.
The facts are clear: President Obama has a pattern of running dishonest campaigns, and the American people deserve better, Amanda Henneberg, Romneys deputy press secretary, said in an e-mail Friday.
The intensified hostility and persistent name-calling dominated the campaign news Friday and signaled that the presidential contest was entering a new phase, moving from relentlessly negative to downright nasty. And in a sign that the tactics were taking a toll on both sides, each candidate felt compelled to conduct a series of television interviews to respond to the criticisms from the other camp.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2012-campaign-enters-a-new-phase-as-obama-and-romney-rachet-up-their-attacks-on-each-other/2012/07/13/gJQAofMqiW_story.html
DCBob
(24,689 posts)They just act like spectators here. Good grief.
spinbaby
(15,090 posts)While I was staggering around getting my morning coffee, I flipped on one of the morning shows and found that the narratives of the morning are, "Kennedy scandal" and "Obama attacks."
malaise
(269,038 posts)outstrips the worst meth head or a coke head
spanone
(135,844 posts)byoung6
(47 posts)"People like Mitt Romney" are not used to being questioned on whether he is teilling the truth. So, Him playing fast and loose with the truth to the SEC, and the State of mass and now the nation, is just not what he is used to having to deal with. Either he lied or he didn't, from the signatures on the papers and by the wages he drew from Bain, looks to me like he was still working there and is lieing.
KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)Willard has lived a very pampered life...and with it comes a feeling of "superiority"...one that has pushed him (as it did with boooosh jr. and other progeny of politicians) to become a "public servant". Actually it's more like "proving" that he's his own man...not his father's son. As a child of privilidge Mittens has been able to get breaks none of us cold ever think about. With the money came people looking the other way when he lied or bullied others...and he assumed this was normal...his own rules different from the others.
No surprise Rmoney thinks he shouldn't be questioned about his past and wealth...no one has ever dared to do that in the past and he honestly can't answer honestly. His life is build on lies and once one falls the rest go with it. So its his default setting...Willard has a real difficulty when it comes to being honest. Unfortunately the corporate media will overlook the flip-flops and lies cause they desperately want a "horse race".
Welcome to DU...
99Forever
(14,524 posts)I am thinking almost the exact same thing. The pampered bully is astounded that anyone would stand up to him and call him out for his antisocial actions. It's never happened to him before. He IS a perfect example of how 1%ers think.Rules, honesty and laws are for everyone else but them.
surrealAmerican
(11,361 posts)... whether he lied: it's a matter of when he lied, and if the lie was against the law. If he wasn't working there, he lied on those SEC forms. If he was, he lied during this campaign.
Welcome to DU. I agree that it doesn't seem to occur to him that anybody would actually check the facts here.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)You oppose whatever attack is made, the media under the cover of 'balanced reporting' runs your language regardless of its truthiness.
The media and the public come to see it as a 'he said-he said'. Major campaign conflagration reduced to smoldering smoke screen.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)surrealAmerican
(11,361 posts)They seem to to working pretty hard to make this story go away.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)The Obama campaign will work pretty hard to keep this alive. I get the sense they aren't going to back down, and will keep demanding an explanation from Romney, no matter how long it takes. The Obama side knows they have some damaging info but it will be a long drawn out fight to get Romney to finally answer to it.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Tennessee Gal
(6,160 posts)It's a lot easier and less time consuming than doing any actual investigative reporting to get to the truth.
With a few exceptions like David Corn, that is what is happening.
Bluerthanblue
(13,669 posts)the rich, entitled, "I answer to no one" Romney world- which like it or not is mostly white-
And the world where the real people live.
If those on the 'right' who are so incensed about the "fat cats" and "ceo's" and "corporate bailouts" can twist their minds around to a place where they can truly support Mitt Romney- the poster boy of CEOdom-
then I cannot help but believe that racism isn't the core issue- unconsious, unintended but just as real and just as ugly.
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)doing what it does to protect its interests.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)But they're letting Mitt say "the voters have seen enough" with ONE tax return??? Really WaPo?? Would you let that slide from a Democrat??