Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Sat Jul 14, 2012, 07:58 AM Jul 2012

President Romney Would Not Remain a Conservative


By Conor Friedersdorf

Jul 13 2012, 8:30 AM ET 36



So often in history, the Republican and Democratic standard-bearers in presidential elections have shaped their respective parties. So far, that isn't true of Mitt Romney, says Francis Wilkinson: "He has not shaped the party in any noticeable, let alone significant, way. The party has shaped him. To win its nomination, he has embodied the values of its most powerful and ascendant wings."

This is most evident in the realm of health care. The approach that Governor Romney implemented in Massachusetts is regarded by Republicans as an abomination because of its resemblance to Obamacare, and so Candidate Romney has pledged to take a different course if elected president. On foreign policy too, Romney has followed conservative orthodoxy rather than articulating any unexpected or unique insight. And he has embraced the Paul Ryan budget, signalling that if he's elected a major part of his domestic agenda will have been formulated within the House of Representatives.

<snip>

The only "real" Romney that matters is the Republican standard bearer currently running for president. There is no mystery about what this Romney stands for: low taxes on the wealthy, large cuts in entitlement spending (for rich and poor alike) and, as post-1980 Republican history and the Romney-endorsed Ryan budget plan both suggest, deficit financing of these and other efforts.

<snip>

What I wonder is how long Romney would represent that incarnation of the Republican Party if elected. To be more precise, I am confident that Romney will only remain loyal to Republican orthodoxy so long as doing so maximizes his popularity and the prospect of his being reelected. The guy just shape-shifts when it's convenient. There can be no doubt about that. So if elected, how long would it be advantageous for Romney to be closely allied with the base?

<snip>

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/07/president-romney-would-not-remain-a-conservative/259779/
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President Romney Would Not Remain a Conservative (Original Post) cali Jul 2012 OP
Want to buy a bridge? He'll become worse. hobbit709 Jul 2012 #1
Shapeshifter. nc4bo Jul 2012 #2
Romney is a big time slime ball, but he's no tea bagger. Curtland1015 Jul 2012 #3
He's not suddenly going to become caring and compassionate. Frank Cannon Jul 2012 #5
I'm not claiming he would. Curtland1015 Jul 2012 #6
I think he'd support lovemydog Jul 2012 #4
All he'll be is a puppet for the billionaires who backed him, such as the Koch Bros. which means FarLeftFist Jul 2012 #7
The 'real' Romney is... Spazito Jul 2012 #8

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
2. Shapeshifter.
Sat Jul 14, 2012, 08:18 AM
Jul 2012

If Bain-gate is the final nail than this should be a shovel of dirt on the casket.

What is W. Mitt Romney willing to do or say to win? Anything.

A DUer said that Mittens is a collector of titles, something I never really thought much about but there may be some truth to it.

Born into wealth but is out to prove he's his own man of title and importance. I'd think he behaved like the typical spoiled lil rich brat bastard when he was younger. Perhaps he's just an empty shell inside, maybe worse.

POTUS would be the ultimate job title on anyone's resume.

Curtland1015

(4,404 posts)
3. Romney is a big time slime ball, but he's no tea bagger.
Sat Jul 14, 2012, 08:28 AM
Jul 2012

He'll pander to the far right to squeeze every vote out of them he can, but I doubt he believes even a fraction of the lunacy they do.

...not that I'm defending the entitled prick.

Frank Cannon

(7,570 posts)
5. He's not suddenly going to become caring and compassionate.
Sat Jul 14, 2012, 08:59 AM
Jul 2012

He's a pathological liar and sociopath.

He's Patrick Bateman without the charm.

If he were elected, we would pine for the relatively carefree Dubya years.

Curtland1015

(4,404 posts)
6. I'm not claiming he would.
Sat Jul 14, 2012, 09:06 AM
Jul 2012

But I do think we tend to caricaturize whoever the current repig dujour is as "the worst possible choice".

Pick Dubya over Romney? Not a chance in hell.

But again, please don't get me wrong. While I'd certainly choose Romney over Bush, I'd still pick a diseased rat over Romney.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
4. I think he'd support
Sat Jul 14, 2012, 08:46 AM
Jul 2012

the same abysmal policy of failed trickle down economics he does now. Along with transnational mega corporate outsourcing & gibberish. Domestically he'd support the social conservative right wing. And demonstrate complete disregard for the poor, immigrants & non-caucasians. To try and please his base to get reelected.

FarLeftFist

(6,161 posts)
7. All he'll be is a puppet for the billionaires who backed him, such as the Koch Bros. which means
Sat Jul 14, 2012, 09:14 AM
Jul 2012

Kiss the environment goodbye, kiss education goodbye, and kiss 75 yrs worth of civil rights gains goodbye.

Spazito

(50,365 posts)
8. The 'real' Romney is...
Sat Jul 14, 2012, 10:42 AM
Jul 2012

the man who idolizes vulture capitalism, believes outsourcing, offshoring IS the American way, thinks the destruction of American businesses in order to generate gross profits for vulture capitalistic corporations is perfectly fine.

All the things I iterated are what the 'real' Romney believed and acted upon BEFORE he was a lying candidate.

Bain IS the REAL Romney.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Romney Would No...