Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHarold Meyerson: Why Is San Bernardino Bankrupt?
from the American Prospect:
Why Is San Bernardino Bankrupt?
Harold Meyerson
July 13, 2012
Municipalities are at the financial brink because of the foreclosure crisisnot rising costs.
The prize for the most abjectly wrong headline in American journalism this week goes, I grieve to say, to the Los Angeles Times. Atop an article analyzing how California cities are coping with horrific budget cruncheswhich ran one day after the working-class exurb of San Bernardino followed its fellow working-class exurb Stockton into municipal bankruptcythe headline writer plunked the following line: Rising costs push California cities to fiscal brink.
The headline doesnt really capture what the ensuing article is about, which is what city governments have done as they have approached or gone over that brink. Rather, the headline advances its very own theory of causality for why Stockton and San Bernardino got into trouble: rising costs, which feeds nicely into the rightwing narrative about municipal unions undermining fiscal viability.
But thats really not what caused the crises of Stockton and San Bernardino. Thousands of other American cities had contractual arrangements with the public employees, many of them far more generous than those of these proletarian burgs. What sets Stockton and San Bernardino apart is that they were at the epicenter of the California housing bubble and the California housing bust. Both cities experienced a wave of residential construction aimed at the most financially shaky homebuyers, who signed a disproportionate number of sub-prime mortgages. And when the bust came, both cities experienced a record number of foreclosures and a sharp dip in employment, since the main industry in both cities was home construction.
Of the 372 federally designated metropolitan areas in the United States, Stockton ranks first in foreclosures, while Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario ranks third. The Bureau of Labor Statistics May breakdown of unemployment rates in the same 372 metro areas, with the area with lowest unemployment rate listed as number one, listed Stockton 364th and San Bernardino 354th. The unemployment rate in the city of Stockton proper in May stood at 17.5 percent; in San Bernardino, at 15.9 percent. ..........(more)
The complete piece is at: http://prospect.org/article/why-san-bernardino-bankrupt
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1094 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Harold Meyerson: Why Is San Bernardino Bankrupt? (Original Post)
marmar
Jul 2012
OP
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)1. Higher foreclosure rate = lower municipal funding levels.
Good article, K/R.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)2. Pork in the form of pet projects