Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Raven

(13,893 posts)
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 04:29 PM Jul 2012

This is Mitt's problem...

totally his, not his campaign's. He has a personal exposure. If he lied to the SEC or to any regulators, he has a problem...personally. He is going to have to be very, very careful when he interviews with the 3 networks. I think he is taking a great risk doing these interviews...smarter people than him have screwed up on these things. Any lawyer worth his/her salt would counsel him not to do this. We'll see what happens but I see nothing but more trouble for him. I am absolutely certain that he has been advised by private counsel not to do this.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
2. Not doing the interviews would be worse
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 04:34 PM
Jul 2012

You can't let lawyers run everything.

Aside from which, he can't be criminally charged, even if there were cause to do so (which is by no means clear at this point). The moment anything like that happened, articles of impeachment for alleged "abuse of power" would go through the House like crap through a goose, and bog down the administration into a circus sideshow.

What was said was "either he lied to the SEC or he lied to the American people". Lying to the American people is, of course, not a crime.

What he's going to say is that he retained those titles during the transitional period of winding down his active engagement in Bain, and that he may have been in some pro forma board meetings, but was not involved in the day-to-day operations. That may pan out to be technically correct.

The real problem that remains is a guy who was "president" of something, but denies having been responsible for anything. The irony, of course, is that he is running for.... president of something.

Raven

(13,893 posts)
4. When you're in for possible criminal
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 04:42 PM
Jul 2012

liability you don't speak to anybody and you let the lawyers run the show.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
6. Hopefully attorneys well versed in SEC laws will be watching. But then again, the SEC is closely
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 04:43 PM
Jul 2012

tied with Wall Street.... so....

Not expecting too much.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
7. Nothing he says tonight will be under oath, and in any case, that damned "lib'rul media" will ...
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 04:43 PM
Jul 2012

cover for any outright felonious admissions he may blurt out.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
8. I think he'll just reiterate his previous lies
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 04:46 PM
Jul 2012

And do it with an innocent look.

He has to. Just like the McCain people had to continue to push Sarah Palin even after they realized she was a disaster.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is Mitt's problem...