Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Thirteenth Amendment Was 'Added Later' Too
The Thirteenth Amendment (Amendment XIII) to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. In Congress, it was passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864, and by the House on January 31, 1865.Oh, and every other amendment that rules the Republic.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1545 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Thirteenth Amendment Was 'Added Later' Too (Original Post)
superpatriotman
Aug 2017
OP
Various people calling for the 17th Amendment (direct election of Senators) to be abolished
brooklynite
Aug 2017
#2
NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)1. What is this in response to?
brooklynite
(94,757 posts)2. Various people calling for the 17th Amendment (direct election of Senators) to be abolished
The theory is, if they were selected the old fashioned way (by State legislatures), they would have been more willing to repeal ACA.
Wounded Bear
(58,726 posts)3. I haven't seen much support for that around here...
It's been mentioned here, but I don't remember a lot of folks agreeing to the principle.
NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)4. Ah.
More pubbie whining I take it?
superpatriotman
(6,252 posts)5. To Stephen Miller revising history
And insinuating that adding something later is insignificant