Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
Tue Aug 1, 2017, 07:16 PM Aug 2017

What is pro choice.

It is being in favor of every woman making their own personal choice as to whether to have an abortion or not.

Which also includes not supporting legislation that infringes on that choice, either way.

I think after reading this board many do not get the concept. This is a PSA.

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What is pro choice. (Original Post) boston bean Aug 2017 OP
It means that half the human race gets to make adult decisions about their bodies, the same way Coventina Aug 2017 #1
No shit/ n/t Brainstormy Aug 2017 #4
True, no shit, as you say. boston bean Aug 2017 #5
Kick and Rec! emulatorloo Aug 2017 #2
Yes, a lot of people claim to support choice- as long as they agree with the choice being made Warren DeMontague Aug 2017 #3
Pro-choice is exactly what it says...."FOR CHOICE"...a woman's choice to control their body. Moostache Aug 2017 #6
Can I assume that this was prompted by the latest expalnation about choice? guillaumeb Aug 2017 #7
Seems some of our national leaders don't get it either. DURHAM D Aug 2017 #8
I think people are getting confused about the principle that you state in your second sentence: George II Aug 2017 #9
I don't give fuck all about their 'personal' feelings leftstreet Aug 2017 #13
So I guess you think Joe Biden is "stupid"? See: George II Aug 2017 #14
Not stupid but I really don't give a fuck what he thinks dembotoz Aug 2017 #20
As far as I know, Joe Biden NEVER told a woman what she could or couldn't do with her body. George II Aug 2017 #21
Still don't give a fuck. dembotoz Aug 2017 #22
I agree. But the devil is in the details. Honeycombe8 Aug 2017 #10
I don't mind someone personally against it, but those for legislating against it should catch Lucky Luciano Aug 2017 #11
It is law. woman are allowed by law to have an abortion. IMO, people do have a right to protest abo Sunlei Aug 2017 #12
I don't think I have a right to tell other people what to think loyalsister Aug 2017 #15
Umm the meaning of the phrase is well known. It is not new. boston bean Aug 2017 #16
Yeah loyalsister Aug 2017 #17
A universal meaning of the phrase is not something I made up. boston bean Aug 2017 #18
Think what you want loyalsister Aug 2017 #19
oh my... boston bean Aug 2017 #24
Language is flexible loyalsister Aug 2017 #25
stop! boston bean Aug 2017 #26
As in the end of a sentence? loyalsister Aug 2017 #29
Wait... are you saying that words actually have established meanings? Squinch Aug 2017 #32
Language, within the confines of obvious context however, is not flexible. LanternWaste Aug 2017 #30
Politically defined language is the most flexible of all loyalsister Aug 2017 #31
IMO, it boils down to minding your own business. Vinca Aug 2017 #23
K&R... spanone Aug 2017 #27
The choice is mine and it is no bodies fucking business what choice I make. SamKnause Aug 2017 #28

Coventina

(27,172 posts)
1. It means that half the human race gets to make adult decisions about their bodies, the same way
Tue Aug 1, 2017, 07:17 PM
Aug 2017

the other half does.


On edit: spelling


Moostache

(9,897 posts)
6. Pro-choice is exactly what it says...."FOR CHOICE"...a woman's choice to control their body.
Tue Aug 1, 2017, 07:27 PM
Aug 2017

"pro-life" on the other hand is immeasurable bullshit...for life...until birth, then fuck nutrition, education, head start programs, and anything that would make 'life' an enjoyable journey for the child forced into existence in a situation the crusaders know NOTHING about...

I have a very simple litmus test for how serious I take ANYONE who tells me they are "pro-life":
1) Did you get that from your preacher? (If 'yes', then go to number 2; if 'no' then go to number 3)
2) So, how many adoptions are you currently sponsoring?
3) So, how many adopted children DO you currently have?

That exposes their bullshit quite easily...women are not brood mares for the state or anyone else, and no one outside of the woman and her CHOSEN confidants (husband, boyfriend, partner, parents, friends or anyone else)...if and only if a woman CHOOSES to bring the decision making process to others for advice should it be proffered...otherwise, your opinion is just the same as everyone else's and just as irrelevant.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
7. Can I assume that this was prompted by the latest expalnation about choice?
Tue Aug 1, 2017, 07:39 PM
Aug 2017

My response was as follows:

if enough Democrats are elected who do not agree that women have the right to make their own health choices, those choices and that right will disappear.

On edit: recommended.

George II

(67,782 posts)
9. I think people are getting confused about the principle that you state in your second sentence:
Tue Aug 1, 2017, 08:10 PM
Aug 2017

A Democratic candidate can have the personal choice of not supporting abortion, but he/she should also not support legislation legislation that infringes on that choice.

As been noted several times here in the last day or two, at least once by me:

Joe Biden is against abortion but would not support legislation that would take away the personal choice of any individual to do so.

Tim Kaine is against abortion but would not support legislation that would take away the personal choice of any individual to do so.

Personally, I do not believe in abortion, but I would not stand in the way of any woman if she chose to have an abortion.

leftstreet

(36,112 posts)
13. I don't give fuck all about their 'personal' feelings
Tue Aug 1, 2017, 09:34 PM
Aug 2017

Why do they feel compelled to preface the claim to want people to have legal rights, by making sure we know how they 'personally' feel?

No one gives a shit

I can't imagine a politician STUPID enough to say, "Well I personally am opposed to (gay marriage, voting rights for blacks,) but I believe people should have the right..."

George II

(67,782 posts)
14. So I guess you think Joe Biden is "stupid"? See:
Tue Aug 1, 2017, 09:41 PM
Aug 2017
http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Joe_Biden_Abortion.htm

Q: You have changed your position on abortion. When you came to the Senate, you believed that Roe v. Wade was not correctly decided and that you also believed the right of abortion was not secured by the Constitution. Why did you change your mind?

A: Well, I was 29 years old when I came to the US Senate, and I have learned a lot. Look, I’m a practicing Catholic, and it is the biggest dilemma for me in terms of comporting my religious and cultural views with my political responsibility.

dembotoz

(16,832 posts)
20. Not stupid but I really don't give a fuck what he thinks
Tue Aug 1, 2017, 10:51 PM
Aug 2017

Yes Uncle Joe is a great man blah blah blah blah
But I don't really give a fuck what he thinks on this.
It's not his body

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
10. I agree. But the devil is in the details.
Tue Aug 1, 2017, 09:15 PM
Aug 2017

There is a disagreement about late-term abortions, and the type of abortion right before delivery when the baby is severely ...whatever.

But for regular abortions (first trimester, decision made not under duress, whatever, I would agree.

I think pro choice is in the Dem Party Platform.

Lucky Luciano

(11,258 posts)
11. I don't mind someone personally against it, but those for legislating against it should catch
Tue Aug 1, 2017, 09:28 PM
Aug 2017

...lots of shit for such uncivilized views.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
12. It is law. woman are allowed by law to have an abortion. IMO, people do have a right to protest abo
Tue Aug 1, 2017, 09:34 PM
Aug 2017

abortion pro or con.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
15. I don't think I have a right to tell other people what to think
Tue Aug 1, 2017, 09:51 PM
Aug 2017

It's not reasonable to claim ownership of vague and flexible language without allowing for variety in the understanding and interpretation that others may have. It just doesn't work that way. "Prochoice" may have a specific political meaning for me, but I can't tell anyone else what their personal distinctions are. Those kinds of intellectual domination efforts are reserved for authoritarians.

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
16. Umm the meaning of the phrase is well known. It is not new.
Tue Aug 1, 2017, 09:54 PM
Aug 2017

And my god if there were no common understanding we wouldn't be able to discern a truth or fact.

Believe me some people are really stupid. Or they are intentionally misleading. Take your pick.

Of course we can base a a point in a well known fact.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
17. Yeah
Tue Aug 1, 2017, 10:01 PM
Aug 2017

The meaning you impose on the letters maybe be something you understand as universal. But that doesn't make it so.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
25. Language is flexible
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 12:18 PM
Aug 2017

and bends to the will of the speaker. If you don't believe this to be true, you might check out a thesaurus someday.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
29. As in the end of a sentence?
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 12:29 PM
Aug 2017

Halt (physically) moving forward, be quiet, do not continue to eat, put an end to thoughts, put an end to existence, or are you referring to the thing on the floor that prevents a door from closing?
I know there are people who don't want to believe that another person could have a single thought that does not match their own, but it's true. Denying it only makes a person come across as intolerant of anything other than themselves and their own thoughts.

Squinch

(51,004 posts)
32. Wait... are you saying that words actually have established meanings?
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 02:07 PM
Aug 2017

That if you say "pro choice" to me, that means "for the ability to decide?" Are you denying that to me it might mean, say, "peanut butter?"

Who knew there were so many restrictions on language!

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
30. Language, within the confines of obvious context however, is not flexible.
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 12:32 PM
Aug 2017

Language, within the confines of obvious context however, is not flexible... nor does it care if you believe it to be true or not.

One may inaccurately and subjectively both infer and misinterpret to better validate a bias, but the bias of interpretation is not necessary for meaning which is collectively obvious.

('The Language Instinct' by Steven Pinker)

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
31. Politically defined language is the most flexible of all
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 12:37 PM
Aug 2017

There are a range of restrictions and procedures that leave the door open for people to be define where the lines are between prochoice and not prochoice. This is why legislation lays out definitions of wordes as they will be used in that particular document.

Vinca

(50,303 posts)
23. IMO, it boils down to minding your own business.
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 07:29 AM
Aug 2017

People must be allowed to make their own decision without government meddling.

SamKnause

(13,110 posts)
28. The choice is mine and it is no bodies fucking business what choice I make.
Wed Aug 2, 2017, 12:26 PM
Aug 2017

I am so glad I am past my child bearing years.

We should not have to re-fight the battles we have already won.

Fuck Theocracy !!!!!!!!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What is pro choice.