Dan Rather: "Donald Trump strutted into Washington 6 months ago promising a revolution..."
Mr. Trump was unfazed with any sense of humility (a word he probably would confuse with humiliate) that his surprising election victory was not extended to the popular vote - which he claimed without any proof (then or since) was the result of fraud. He denigrated his predecessor by all possible criteria. Said the United States wasn't respected on the world stage, that Obamacare was a disaster that would be easily replaceable on Day One, and spoke of governing and deal making as easy and his strengths.
Many Republicans were, at least publicly, willing to go along with the show. With control of both houses of Congress and the White House this was their chance to "win". But win what? And what if the country, our rule of law, and the norms of our civic life would be lost in the process?
An earthquake has come to Washington. And the aftershocks continue seemingly by the hour. But earthquakes can inflict widespread damage, especially to buildings of shoddy construction. And that seems to extend to the current Republican Party.
What does the GOP really stand for? Why can it not govern? And is it now indelibly the Party of Trump?
I thought these questions might come, but not so soon, not so fierce, and not so openly by many in the GOP. The failure of healthcare, the height of cynical and disingenuous of political strategies, has laid bare deep cracks in the foundation of Republican leadership, cracks that will likely only intensify. Many are talking today about Arizona Senator Jeff Flake's devastating rhetorically take down of his own party in an article in Politico. We are seeing Lisa Murkowski return to Alaska after she cast a decisive vote against repeal of the Affordable Care Act, and be hailed as a hero. We see more and more statements off the record or by columnists with close ties to the GOP that start to give voice to the idea that their party will have to change, and change radically, or risk irrelevance.
To be sure, these are small stirrings for now. But once talk like this has been given voice, a slow drone can quickly become a rumble that shakes the status quo with greater intensity. I have seen political realignments at other points in my life. It often swells up from the bottom. Look particularly to GOP governors and state representatives seeking to tack to the winds of the future. We are a country that depends on a debate of ideas and two parties dedicated to public service and the democratic process.
Political winds are shifting, a new breeze is starting to blow. And it has the potential to be very refreshing.
https://www.facebook.com/theDanRather/posts/10159108400970716
= new reply since forum marked as read
But I'm not willing to once again absolve the past by looking to the future. It was a failure to hold Republicans accountable for the elective Bush wars and occupations, the disastrous tax cuts, and the near meltdown of our economic system that kept Republicans on track enough to realize their dream of total domination of our government. That party is decidedly NOT dedicated to public service or the democratic process. Beginning in 2000 with the installation of George W. Bush when he didn't capture even a plurality of the vote; continuing through to 2010 when Republicans sequestered enough votes to put themselves back in the majority; until the culmination in 2016 of a combination of foreign meddling, election irregularities, and the success of outright lies gave Republicans the control they've sought for decades.
The next time you see any voice in the media lecturing Republicans about their duty to reach across the aisle will be the first time you see anyone say that. Republicans polled fewer votes for the presidency, and their congressional majorities represent a similar minority of the electorate empowered by shrewd manipulation (the Supreme Court called it "surgical precision"
of congressional districts. And yet, the media have sat passively by as Republicans steamroll all opposition, indeed even all discussion, on various matters vital to the functioning of the country. There is no current political debate in the United States, and the media have enabled and encouraged that, even though Republican ideas represent a minority viewpoint. If a Democratic voice is allowed, it is outnumbered by at least 2-1 (and more often 3-1 or 4-1) in any panel discussion.
From your lips to God's ears Dan. 
