Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts)
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 10:26 PM Jul 2012

Breaking: Romney was 100% stakeholder in 11 Bain companies later than 1999

Breaking: Romney was 100% stakeholder in 11 Bain companies later than 1999

http://current.com/shows/the-war-room/videos/breaking-romney-was-100-stakeholder-in-11-bain-companies-later-than-1999

“The War Room” and Current TV have uncovered further evidence of Mitt Romney’s lies about the extent of his ties to Bain after 1999, when he claims to have left the company. A 2003 document with the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission state that Romney held several “executive” positions at Bain Capital and its affiliates. “The Massachusetts Ethics Commission filing distinguishes between the Bain companies in which he played an active role and others where he had ‘no active role,’” Jennifer Granholm says.
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking: Romney was 100% stakeholder in 11 Bain companies later than 1999 (Original Post) Amerigo Vespucci Jul 2012 OP
Oh noes.!!!. Historic NY Jul 2012 #1
He's going to end up dropping out. randome Jul 2012 #2
I hate the thought of that. Jack Sprat Jul 2012 #10
I would love it if that happened, but whathehell Jul 2012 #12
Oh they will certainly run someone. Jack Sprat Jul 2012 #18
LOL...That certainly is a colorful description! whathehell Jul 2012 #24
He likely had veto power moondust Jul 2012 #3
Look, just because he was the sole shareholder Bolo Boffin Jul 2012 #4
The outsourcer and chief outsourced his seat. DearAbby Jul 2012 #7
Assuming that he didn't know what was going on... elzenmahn Jul 2012 #14
;-) Bolo Boffin Jul 2012 #23
After a rough day - I have found my good news. Sweet dreams to me, thanks to you. n/t Mira Jul 2012 #5
That sounds like a "SMOKING GUN"! DrewFlorida Jul 2012 #6
It's a useful weapon against RMoney... elzenmahn Jul 2012 #15
K&R n/t Tx4obama Jul 2012 #8
That's his bane. However, Jack Sprat Jul 2012 #9
I would love for the R convention to be an out & out catastrophe - they deserve it wordpix Jul 2012 #17
actual document Mitt filed michael811 Jul 2012 #11
Welcome to DU! And thanks for sharing! Amonester Jul 2012 #13
Thanks and your welcome michael811 Jul 2012 #16
A company by any other name would smell as rat-ass. Let me count the names of Bain derivatives wordpix Jul 2012 #20
thanks, good work. Exhibit B-6: "various" for % of BCIP owned? That's acceptable for a filing? wordpix Jul 2012 #19
Mitt general passive partner in a few companies executive in others michael811 Jul 2012 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author michael811 Jul 2012 #21
As a 100%-stakeholder, to think der Mittens provided indepat Jul 2012 #25
How many of these companies invested in the 2002 Olympics? w8liftinglady Jul 2012 #26
Yep and Juliani said all Romney did was in the best interest of the shareholders HereSince1628 Jul 2012 #27
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
2. He's going to end up dropping out.
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 10:34 PM
Jul 2012

If not because of this, then because of the other cuts that are bleeding out and the ones to come.

 

Jack Sprat

(2,500 posts)
10. I hate the thought of that.
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 01:08 AM
Jul 2012

How can you ever run a campaign against these cretins if they keep shuffling King Lizards down the stretch? In their point of view, one convict for the rethug nomination is as good as another.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
12. I would love it if that happened, but
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 01:21 AM
Jul 2012

who are the repukes going to run if he does?..Has this ever

happened before that you know of?...I think they're

pretty much obliged to run SOMEBODY, aren't they?

 

Jack Sprat

(2,500 posts)
18. Oh they will certainly run someone.
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 01:43 AM
Jul 2012

They will have an open convention and nominate some puss-faced, piss-ant of an average run-of-the mill dried up old prune for the teabagging crowd to suckle on.

moondust

(19,993 posts)
3. He likely had veto power
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 10:40 PM
Jul 2012

over everything Bain did as long as he was listed as CEO and Chairman and maybe even beyond. Maybe even today.

It may also be relevant that the SEC documents in question would have been filed during the Bush administration when the SEC was asleep on the job.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
4. Look, just because he was the sole shareholder
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 10:44 PM
Jul 2012

and President and CEO and COO of most of these companies, it doesn't mean he knew what the hell was going on. Even if it's millions of dollars of business, do you expect Mitt Gotdamn Romney to bother with checking into trifles like that? He has people to run those companies. He just cashed the paychecks and the dividend checks and went on his merry way without a care in the world if the businesses were being run straight up or straight down.

elzenmahn

(904 posts)
14. Assuming that he didn't know what was going on...
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 01:34 AM
Jul 2012

...in the companies he owned and/or controlled, then that's even more reason why he's not qualified. He's the Captain of those ships, so knowledge or not, he should go down with 'em.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
23. ;-)
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 02:21 AM
Jul 2012

Yes, his performance as Chief Executive in those companies was so shockingly sub-par that in 2002 he had his retirement made legally retroactive to 1999. But rest assured that if things go crashingly bad in this country because he found another bright, shiny toy to occupy his time, he'll just have Congress retroactively recognize his resignation so that nothing sticks to him.

DrewFlorida

(1,096 posts)
6. That sounds like a "SMOKING GUN"!
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 11:30 PM
Jul 2012

Thank you Current TV, good work.
I think we may have the smoking gun needed to sink the MITTANIC.

elzenmahn

(904 posts)
15. It's a useful weapon against RMoney...
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 01:39 AM
Jul 2012

...but the O-team will need at least one more like this to ensure victory.

This is early in the cycle to reveal this - we haven't even had the conventions or the debates as of yet. Rove and his billion dollar minions have plenty of time to spin this fact-turd into cotton candy, and they can't be allowed to do so.

BTW - Obama vs. RMoney in the debates: I am SOOO looking forward to watching Mittens having his ASS handed to him.

 

Jack Sprat

(2,500 posts)
9. That's his bane. However,
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 01:02 AM
Jul 2012

I hate to see him outed or overthrown now as the rethug candidate. That's what they were doing in the early primaries, passing the torch to another candidate to see if one wasn't as unlikeable as the one before.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
17. I would love for the R convention to be an out & out catastrophe - they deserve it
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 01:39 AM
Jul 2012

Hope the donors had a fun night at Chain-ee's giving up their million$ to Job Killer Tax Haven Mitt.

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
13. Welcome to DU! And thanks for sharing!
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 01:31 AM
Jul 2012

Great find! And yes, interesting how muddling the waters is the MO of vulture capitalists.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
19. thanks, good work. Exhibit B-6: "various" for % of BCIP owned? That's acceptable for a filing?
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 01:47 AM
Jul 2012

Geesh, the guy's running for gov. and he files "various?" That's something the SEC should have asked about, I think. Not to mention, it looks like he was VERY involved in Bain ventures in 2002.

michael811

(67 posts)
21. Mitt general passive partner in a few companies executive in others
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 02:08 AM
Jul 2012

it says this specifically for "general partner" (passive ) at bottom of A-5 page 2 "this designation indicates that while Gov Romney was listed as general partner of this entity and therefore in theory had management authority ,in fact he played no active role in the management of this entity"

It Doesn't say anything of the kind for any of the companies he is listed as executive or director or board memeber of and I find that very telling.

Response to Amerigo Vespucci (Original post)

indepat

(20,899 posts)
25. As a 100%-stakeholder, to think der Mittens provided
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 09:15 PM
Jul 2012

no input in the management of these entities is laughable, if not absurdly comical, but I will accept it if he received no compensation.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
27. Yep and Juliani said all Romney did was in the best interest of the shareholders
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 09:43 PM
Jul 2012

For once Juliani has said something true.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking: Romney was 100%...