General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBreaking: Romney was 100% stakeholder in 11 Bain companies later than 1999
http://current.com/shows/the-war-room/videos/breaking-romney-was-100-stakeholder-in-11-bain-companies-later-than-1999
The War Room and Current TV have uncovered further evidence of Mitt Romneys lies about the extent of his ties to Bain after 1999, when he claims to have left the company. A 2003 document with the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission state that Romney held several executive positions at Bain Capital and its affiliates. The Massachusetts Ethics Commission filing distinguishes between the Bain companies in which he played an active role and others where he had no active role, Jennifer Granholm says.
Historic NY
(37,451 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)If not because of this, then because of the other cuts that are bleeding out and the ones to come.
Jack Sprat
(2,500 posts)How can you ever run a campaign against these cretins if they keep shuffling King Lizards down the stretch? In their point of view, one convict for the rethug nomination is as good as another.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)who are the repukes going to run if he does?..Has this ever
happened before that you know of?...I think they're
pretty much obliged to run SOMEBODY, aren't they?
Jack Sprat
(2,500 posts)They will have an open convention and nominate some puss-faced, piss-ant of an average run-of-the mill dried up old prune for the teabagging crowd to suckle on.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)moondust
(19,993 posts)over everything Bain did as long as he was listed as CEO and Chairman and maybe even beyond. Maybe even today.
It may also be relevant that the SEC documents in question would have been filed during the Bush administration when the SEC was asleep on the job.
Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)and President and CEO and COO of most of these companies, it doesn't mean he knew what the hell was going on. Even if it's millions of dollars of business, do you expect Mitt Gotdamn Romney to bother with checking into trifles like that? He has people to run those companies. He just cashed the paychecks and the dividend checks and went on his merry way without a care in the world if the businesses were being run straight up or straight down.
DearAbby
(12,461 posts)elzenmahn
(904 posts)...in the companies he owned and/or controlled, then that's even more reason why he's not qualified. He's the Captain of those ships, so knowledge or not, he should go down with 'em.
Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)Yes, his performance as Chief Executive in those companies was so shockingly sub-par that in 2002 he had his retirement made legally retroactive to 1999. But rest assured that if things go crashingly bad in this country because he found another bright, shiny toy to occupy his time, he'll just have Congress retroactively recognize his resignation so that nothing sticks to him.
Mira
(22,380 posts)DrewFlorida
(1,096 posts)Thank you Current TV, good work.
I think we may have the smoking gun needed to sink the MITTANIC.
elzenmahn
(904 posts)...but the O-team will need at least one more like this to ensure victory.
This is early in the cycle to reveal this - we haven't even had the conventions or the debates as of yet. Rove and his billion dollar minions have plenty of time to spin this fact-turd into cotton candy, and they can't be allowed to do so.
BTW - Obama vs. RMoney in the debates: I am SOOO looking forward to watching Mittens having his ASS handed to him.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Jack Sprat
(2,500 posts)I hate to see him outed or overthrown now as the rethug candidate. That's what they were doing in the early primaries, passing the torch to another candidate to see if one wasn't as unlikeable as the one before.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Hope the donors had a fun night at Chain-ee's giving up their million$ to Job Killer Tax Haven Mitt.
michael811
(67 posts)I found the actual document Mitt filed on a website online its pretty interesting
http://romneyfacts.com/assets/Personal%20Financial%20Forms/Personal%20finances/SFI/2002%20SFI%20WMR.pdf
Amonester
(11,541 posts)Great find! And yes, interesting how muddling the waters is the MO of vulture capitalists.
michael811
(67 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)Geesh, the guy's running for gov. and he files "various?" That's something the SEC should have asked about, I think. Not to mention, it looks like he was VERY involved in Bain ventures in 2002.
michael811
(67 posts)it says this specifically for "general partner" (passive ) at bottom of A-5 page 2 "this designation indicates that while Gov Romney was listed as general partner of this entity and therefore in theory had management authority ,in fact he played no active role in the management of this entity"
It Doesn't say anything of the kind for any of the companies he is listed as executive or director or board memeber of and I find that very telling.
Response to Amerigo Vespucci (Original post)
michael811 This message was self-deleted by its author.
indepat
(20,899 posts)no input in the management of these entities is laughable, if not absurdly comical, but I will accept it if he received no compensation.
w8liftinglady
(23,278 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)For once Juliani has said something true.