Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKrugman: Plutocrats on Parade
Plutocrats on Parade
<...>
I would just chime in that I agree with Robin that Romney is in very serious trouble. Think of the pattern thats accumulating: the obfuscation over the Bain record on jobs, outsourcing, and all that, the mysterious offshore accounts (and the magical $100 million IRA), the stonewalling on past tax records, and now his insistence that he was no longer working at a company that continued to list him as CEO and pay him lots of money.
Republicans have long thrived on the not like you strategy portraying Democrats as somehow alien and un-American (remember how John Kerry supposedly looked French). But theyve been throwing that stuff at Obama for four years; if they havent managed to turn him into a Kenyan Muslim Marxist yet, they never will. Meanwhile, they themselves have a candidate who is definitely not like the rest of us, heavily engaged in tax-avoiding financial deals that may have been legal but which voters will rightly see as the kind of thing only the very rich can pull off.
Whats more, I suspect that the honesty thing will finally gain traction. For months some of us have been groaning over Romneys almost surreal dishonesty over policy issues, but have largely given up hope that reporters would get best shape of the earth: views differ. But saying you were no longer at a company that listed you as CEO gets this down to the personal level.
And all of this is completely fair when a candidate makes his business success his prime argument for why he should be president.
- more -
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/12/plutocrats-on-parade/
<...>
I would just chime in that I agree with Robin that Romney is in very serious trouble. Think of the pattern thats accumulating: the obfuscation over the Bain record on jobs, outsourcing, and all that, the mysterious offshore accounts (and the magical $100 million IRA), the stonewalling on past tax records, and now his insistence that he was no longer working at a company that continued to list him as CEO and pay him lots of money.
Republicans have long thrived on the not like you strategy portraying Democrats as somehow alien and un-American (remember how John Kerry supposedly looked French). But theyve been throwing that stuff at Obama for four years; if they havent managed to turn him into a Kenyan Muslim Marxist yet, they never will. Meanwhile, they themselves have a candidate who is definitely not like the rest of us, heavily engaged in tax-avoiding financial deals that may have been legal but which voters will rightly see as the kind of thing only the very rich can pull off.
Whats more, I suspect that the honesty thing will finally gain traction. For months some of us have been groaning over Romneys almost surreal dishonesty over policy issues, but have largely given up hope that reporters would get best shape of the earth: views differ. But saying you were no longer at a company that listed you as CEO gets this down to the personal level.
And all of this is completely fair when a candidate makes his business success his prime argument for why he should be president.
- more -
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/12/plutocrats-on-parade/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1089 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: Plutocrats on Parade (Original Post)
ProSense
Jul 2012
OP
Auggie
(31,188 posts)1. This is good ...
but I expect Karl Rove and company haven't even begun to dig into their bag of dirty tricks yet. I expect the aim will not be to try and salvage Romney's character but to paint the President's as an even more heinous monster.
Remember the whisper campaign against John McCain in 2000 Republican presidential primary?
quaker bill
(8,224 posts)2. The problem here is that they have been doing it constantly for 4 years
there is no news value left in their hatred of the man. Any votes this was going to move were moved a long time ago.