Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFireDogLake: The War On Workers Comes to California, in Disguise
http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/07/12/the-war-on-workers-comes-to-california-in-disguise/
By: David Dayen Thursday July 12, 2012 7:10 am
After the victory in Wisconsin, many wondered where conservative interests would strike next to finish off unions and permanently alter the power relationship between labor and capital. It appears the next step is California. In November, voters will decide on an initiative, Prop 32, that would eliminate unions from having any voice in politics whatsoever, according to one labor official.
In its simplest form the measure, often called paycheck protection on the right, would stop unions from using automatic payroll deductions from their members for political activity. Similar measures have been on the ballot before in California, and have been beaten back both times. In 1998, voters rejected Prop 226, and in 2005, they similarly beat back Prop 75. But those were frontal assaults against unions. The difference here is that the supporters have dressed up this initiative as a campaign finance reform measure that affects corporations and unions in equal measure. Prop 32 supports call it the Stop Special Interest Money Initiative. Nothing could be further from the truth, says the opposition to Prop 32.
The people who drafted this are the same people who twice before tried this and failed, says Brian Brokaw, the communications director for No on 32. They claim that its even-handed, in that it bans both unions and corporations from collecting political funds via payroll deductions. But corporations dont use payroll deductions for political funds, they just use their own treasuries.
Its actually more insidious than that. The initiative has two parts. First, it bans direct political donations to state candidates from both corporations and unions. Neither side does a whole lot of that, as independent expenditures are more common in support of or opposition to individual candidates. But the definition of a corporation is made so narrow in the initiative language, granting a number of special exemptions to entities such as LLCs, limited partnerships, insurance companies, hedge funds, developers, Wall Street investment firms and more. They carefully drafted this to exempt themselves, Brokaw says. Any corporation could set up a shell company and continue the practice of direct political contributions.
FULL story at link.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 750 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FireDogLake: The War On Workers Comes to California, in Disguise (Original Post)
Omaha Steve
Jul 2012
OP
benld74
(9,909 posts)1. Ive seen similar ads on tv, I had to explain to my daughter's,,,,
current boy friend WHAT the message behind the ad was all about. WWhen he thought about it, he said slowly, Ahhhh now I see what you're saying. I really dont think I was THAT naive when I was 18,,,,