Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spanone

(135,838 posts)
Mon Jul 24, 2017, 06:49 PM Jul 2017

Federal judge green-lights collection of voter data



(CNN)A federal judge in DC declined to block President Donald Trump's voter integrity commission from collecting data on voters from 50 states in a ruling on Monday, handing a win to an administration inundated by lawsuits over the commission's request.

The commission's vice chairman, Kris Kobach, sent a letter to all 50 states requesting a slew of voter roll data in late June. Kobach said he was only asking for what was publicly available under the laws of each state, but the request nevertheless triggered rapid-fire litigation in federal courts, including a suit by a privacy rights group in which claimed the commission had failed to comply with federal law and the request violated constitutionally-protected privacy rights.

The commission ceased all collection efforts earlier this month and opted to switch from using a Defense Department website to host the voter data to having it maintained by an existing system within the White House.

US District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly concluded Monday that the Electronic Privacy Information Center did not have standing to sue on all of its claims under existing case law.


http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/24/politics/judge-denies-restraining-order-on-voter-data/index.html
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

haele

(12,659 posts)
2. Dolores Umbridge's Muggle cousin.
Mon Jul 24, 2017, 06:53 PM
Jul 2017

I'm sure she's sleeps very soundly with her ideas of what constitutes morality, privacy, as well as what constitutes a citizen and a native born non-citizen.

Haele

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
7. "If states have to do this, the democracy is done, no point in voting."
Mon Jul 24, 2017, 07:07 PM
Jul 2017

We won't be able TO vote.

2018 & 2020 looking more like thuglicans/putin & the ruskies completely destroying the last of our democracy and cementing in a permanent thuglican majority in control of EVERYTHING.

Igel

(35,317 posts)
13. Read the request.
Mon Jul 24, 2017, 09:28 PM
Jul 2017

It makes the judge's ruling fairly clear.

(Do *not* read what the media say the request was, what Twitter says the request was, what most posts on DU say the request was. Find the original source, the citation text, and read that.)

 

Sailor65x1

(554 posts)
6. Yes, bring on the now-common DU misogyny
Mon Jul 24, 2017, 07:06 PM
Jul 2017

Anyone who actually reads the article will see that the judge did not find "For" trump, nor did she state that he was right. The ruling is only that the plaintiff did not have standing on all points, and that her court could not exercise judicial review because of technical points.

But hey, now that she's the "Enemy," lets' make fun of her hair, her clothes, her age, her face, because we're so right!

 

MindPilot

(12,693 posts)
10. True, but that's how the courts function to deny these cases.
Mon Jul 24, 2017, 08:01 PM
Jul 2017

For years the courts have made it more and more difficult to demonstrate standing. Thereby making the courts less and less accessible to the average citizen, and essentially finding for the government by default.

So yes, she is one of "them" and should be treated as such.

I'm calling my local registrar of voters tomorrow to see if I can de-register.

dragonlady

(3,577 posts)
12. Do you really want to give up your right to vote?
Mon Jul 24, 2017, 08:43 PM
Jul 2017

I would be interested in knowing more about your thought process here. Losing my right as a citizen to vote for the candidates I favor would absolutely crush me and I would never do it voluntarily.

 

MindPilot

(12,693 posts)
14. You've already lost your right to vote.
Thu Jul 27, 2017, 03:13 PM
Jul 2017

Or more accurately you've lost your right to cast a vote that counts for anything.

Did the person who won the election move into the office? Do the people you voted for actually represent your interests? Unless you live in Iowa, you have virtually no input regarding who runs.

Here in California, the primaries are pretty much already decided by the time we get to cast our ballots.

I've voted in every election since I turned 18, and over the years it has become more and more a meaningless exercise in futility that serves only to make me feel like I'm doing something worthwhile...like recycling.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal judge green-light...