Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate Parliamentarian Upends GOP Hopes For Health Bill - supermajority needed!!
In which bureaucratic wonks save the day....
The official rules keeper in the Senate Friday tossed a bucket of cold water on the Senate Republican health bill by advising that major parts of the bill cannot be passed with a simple majority, but rather would require 60 votes. Republicans hold only 52 seats in the Senate.
Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough said that a super-majority is needed for the temporary defunding of Planned Parenthood, abortion coverage restrictions to health plans purchased with tax credits and the requirement that people with breaks in coverage wait six months before they can purchase new plans.
The Senate is using a budget process called reconciliation that allows Republicans to pass a bill with only 50 votes (and the potential tie to be broken by Vice President Mike Pence). But there are strict rules about what can and cannot be included, and those rules are enforced by the parliamentarian. Those rules can be waived, but that requires 60 votes, and all the chambers Democrats have vowed to fight every version of the bill to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, which is set for a possible vote next week.
...........................................................................
Among the other provisions that the parliamentarian has advised should require 60 votes are ones that would eliminate Medicaid requirements to provide 10 essential health benefits. Also on the list is a provision to repeal a requirement that insurers spend a minimum amount of each premium dollar on direct medical services, rather than administration or profits.
The determination also pertains to a part of the bill that would continue payments for cost-sharing subsidies to insurers for two more years. Those subsidies help lower-income people afford out-of-pocket costs like deductibles. The parliamentarian said that duplicated existing law.
MacDonough also said that a provision in the House version of the bill that pertains directly to New York violates the Byrd Rule. That measure would change the way the state collects money for Medicaid. That could suggest efforts by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to offer state-specific changes to gain support for the bill might meet the same fate.
......................................................
Not all the decisions went the Democrats way. MacDonough found that only a simple majority is needed for language allowing states to impose work requirements for Medicaid recipients. She also said that a provision that will ban abortions if the services are paid through a new fund provided to states would be allowed. Thats because that fund will be governed by existing rules that already ban abortion in most cases.
A few provisions remain under review, according to the list. Those include allowing states to waive a long list of insurance protections, including the ACAs essential health benefits and preexisting coverage guarantees. Also still under review is language allowing small businesses to pool together to purchase insurance as well as a provision changing requirements related to how much more insurers can charge older adults.
Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough said that a super-majority is needed for the temporary defunding of Planned Parenthood, abortion coverage restrictions to health plans purchased with tax credits and the requirement that people with breaks in coverage wait six months before they can purchase new plans.
The Senate is using a budget process called reconciliation that allows Republicans to pass a bill with only 50 votes (and the potential tie to be broken by Vice President Mike Pence). But there are strict rules about what can and cannot be included, and those rules are enforced by the parliamentarian. Those rules can be waived, but that requires 60 votes, and all the chambers Democrats have vowed to fight every version of the bill to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, which is set for a possible vote next week.
...........................................................................
Among the other provisions that the parliamentarian has advised should require 60 votes are ones that would eliminate Medicaid requirements to provide 10 essential health benefits. Also on the list is a provision to repeal a requirement that insurers spend a minimum amount of each premium dollar on direct medical services, rather than administration or profits.
The determination also pertains to a part of the bill that would continue payments for cost-sharing subsidies to insurers for two more years. Those subsidies help lower-income people afford out-of-pocket costs like deductibles. The parliamentarian said that duplicated existing law.
MacDonough also said that a provision in the House version of the bill that pertains directly to New York violates the Byrd Rule. That measure would change the way the state collects money for Medicaid. That could suggest efforts by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to offer state-specific changes to gain support for the bill might meet the same fate.
......................................................
Not all the decisions went the Democrats way. MacDonough found that only a simple majority is needed for language allowing states to impose work requirements for Medicaid recipients. She also said that a provision that will ban abortions if the services are paid through a new fund provided to states would be allowed. Thats because that fund will be governed by existing rules that already ban abortion in most cases.
A few provisions remain under review, according to the list. Those include allowing states to waive a long list of insurance protections, including the ACAs essential health benefits and preexisting coverage guarantees. Also still under review is language allowing small businesses to pool together to purchase insurance as well as a provision changing requirements related to how much more insurers can charge older adults.
http://khn.org/news/ruling-by-senate-parliamentarian-upends-gop-hopes-for-health-care-bill/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1580 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Parliamentarian Upends GOP Hopes For Health Bill - supermajority needed!! (Original Post)
ehrnst
Jul 2017
OP
All these items would have to be stripped from the bill before it could be passed with 51 votes
Jersey Devil
Jul 2017
#3
annabanana
(52,791 posts)1. Interesting. . . .n/t
dalton99a
(81,636 posts)2. McConnell is probably working right now to change the rules
Jersey Devil
(9,875 posts)3. All these items would have to be stripped from the bill before it could be passed with 51 votes
I am interested in the provisions that haven't been ruled on yet like the ACS essential health benefits waiver and preexisting coverage guarantees. If they need 60 votes that would devastate the Repubs.
Cicada
(4,533 posts)4. ELIZABETH! DON'T go on the D.C. Subway tracks!
We don't need another Zoe Barnes.
machoneman
(4,014 posts)5. Zoe, I miss you!
Great series but i shuddered when Spacey pushed her into the train's path. She musta' be good in....well, you know!