Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

drray23

(7,635 posts)
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 11:06 AM Jul 2017

Whoaa so now we learn there were actual spies in the don jr meeting

it turns out that a lobbyist who is a former Russian counter intelligence officer ( not sure there is such a thing as former...) and another unidentified man billed as a translator.

this changes everything. It's hard to make the case that it was not collusion..

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Whoaa so now we learn there were actual spies in the don jr meeting (Original Post) drray23 Jul 2017 OP
What was offered in return? NCTraveler Jul 2017 #1
Because these losers are held to a different standard. drray23 Jul 2017 #4
IOIYAAR....plain and simple... Moostache Jul 2017 #9
They held no government position. You did. NCTraveler Jul 2017 #10
That's regulation. drray23 Jul 2017 #13
Again, apples and oranges. NCTraveler Jul 2017 #14
An acquaintance ranted about these interviews Yonnie3 Jul 2017 #12
I thought the emails spelled that out? SHRED Jul 2017 #16
I think a lot of things are spelling that out. NCTraveler Jul 2017 #22
Removal of Obama's sanctions cyclonefence Jul 2017 #26
I've used up all my "you just can't make this crap up"s for my lifetime ages ago. Yonnie3 Jul 2017 #2
it doesn't matter that they got nothing-IT WAS THE INTENT VaBchTgerLily Jul 2017 #3
Exactly ! drray23 Jul 2017 #5
If I try to rob a bank, do I get away with it if the bank has no money that day? Iggo Jul 2017 #15
You believe them when they say they got nothing? I've got a bridge to sell you. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #23
And who is surprised by this latest news? fleur-de-lisa Jul 2017 #6
"It's hard to make the case that it was not collusion.." LakeArenal Jul 2017 #7
Many Russian translators are active reserve intelligence dalton99a Jul 2017 #8
Veselnitskaya is a lead attorney in recent DOJ settled fraud lawsuit...not some "nothingburger" Moostache Jul 2017 #11
You got a link for that? Source? Amaryllis Jul 2017 #17
It's everywhere in the news. drray23 Jul 2017 #18
Thanks - I just got online and this was the first thread i clicked on so didnt know how much had Amaryllis Jul 2017 #20
Besides Don Jr, you mean? Iggo Jul 2017 #19
I really have that sinking feeling Timmygoat Jul 2017 #21
Let's stop using the word 'COLLUSION'. It's "conspiracy", "coordination", "espionage." yodermon Jul 2017 #24
Indeed. It certainly falls under the espionage act.nt. drray23 Jul 2017 #25
Recommended. H2O Man Jul 2017 #27
Waiting for the alt right/left alliance to try spinning this... Blue_Tires Jul 2017 #28
Strip Kushner's security clearance now! BadgerMom Jul 2017 #29
Also his wife's, and his father-in-law's jmowreader Jul 2017 #31
Fox news has decided Watchfoxheadexplodes Jul 2017 #30
AND the lobbyist has been accused of being a hired HACKER. pnwmom Jul 2017 #32
And yet the republicans will say drray23 Jul 2017 #34
Did Jared include GRU officer Rinat Akhmetshin in his most recent Security Clearance Revision? TheBlackAdder Jul 2017 #33
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
1. What was offered in return?
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 11:10 AM
Jul 2017

That's the question and will be difficult to prove. It's going to have to be a direct connection.

drray23

(7,635 posts)
4. Because these losers are held to a different standard.
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 11:20 AM
Jul 2017

I am a senior scientist for the department of energy. each time I come back from an overseas trip I get to sit with a doe counterintelligence officer for debrief. I can't take my own phone or laptop. I'm given a travel laptop that is wiped upon return to the us. If I so much told the Ci officer anything deemed inaccurate I would have some explaining to do.
Meanwhile, Jared goes around lying, keeps having to redo his sf86 and everything is ok.. this really pisses me off.

Moostache

(9,897 posts)
9. IOIYAAR....plain and simple...
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 11:37 AM
Jul 2017

You simply have the wrong political leanings...so you must be rigidly controlled and monitored; however, the rules cease to apply as soon as you put on that shiny red "R"...

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
10. They held no government position. You did.
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 11:40 AM
Jul 2017

I was simply talking about the word collusion. That's pretty clear. The omission of meetings is a different scenario.

People running for office should be able to use their own phones and laptops. Not sure why you added that.

The sf86 is a real issue. Same with investigating if anything was offered in return. I don't think we should compare apples and oranges considering what the dirt that is actually surfacing.

drray23

(7,635 posts)
13. That's regulation.
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 11:43 AM
Jul 2017

You can not use your laptop/phone when you travel overseas on official business. They instead give you secure laptops/phones for the trip. The idea is that the devices could get compromised and then when you are back and connect to the wifi at work with those same devices it's a possible security breach.

Yonnie3

(17,451 posts)
12. An acquaintance ranted about these interviews
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 11:42 AM
Jul 2017

He traveled all over the world as a senior scientist at NCAR. He pointed out that the Russian scientist with whom he was collaborating was able to come in and out of the country with drives containing his data, but my acquaintance couldn't carry data. The very same data! He also got interviewed after the scientist visited him in the US.

My acquaintance has retired. I'm not sure of the viability of employment in atmospheric research in the current administration.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
22. I think a lot of things are spelling that out.
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 12:19 PM
Jul 2017

I think the emails are horrible when it comes to optics. Can you show me where something is offered in return? I truly might have missed it.

Is this them?

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/07/11/us/politics/donald-trump-jr-email-text.html

cyclonefence

(4,483 posts)
26. Removal of Obama's sanctions
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 12:30 PM
Jul 2017

hence the reference to Russian adoptions, which Don Jr. is too stupid to know were halted in response to the sanctions.

Yonnie3

(17,451 posts)
2. I've used up all my "you just can't make this crap up"s for my lifetime ages ago.
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 11:15 AM
Jul 2017

The drips are coming faster and faster. Every darn day more drips. Maybe the drips will never become a torrent, but their ship will sink as it slowly fills from these leaks.

I would, of course, prefer a flood of biblical proportions.

VaBchTgerLily

(231 posts)
3. it doesn't matter that they got nothing-IT WAS THE INTENT
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 11:18 AM
Jul 2017

ignorant or not-ignorance is no excuse for the law and they should all be going to jail! the e-mails show informed them it was Russian government personnel so they knew what they were doing was wrong. Just the fact that they kept it from the general public this long shows that they knew this was wrong. It's COLLUSION!!!

drray23

(7,635 posts)
5. Exactly !
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 11:23 AM
Jul 2017

Some of the trump defenders are trying to spin that nothing happened so it was fine...
Hopefully the democrats will push back pointing out that the intent is what matters. As a matter of fact I am starting to see politicians and pundits doing just that.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,026 posts)
23. You believe them when they say they got nothing? I've got a bridge to sell you.
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 12:20 PM
Jul 2017

I'm pretty sure that they got the final signoff on whatever agreement they have for collusion. Perhaps no data or dirt was passed from one hand to another at the meeting (hence "we didn't get the dirt that day&quot but you can be sure that it was transmitted soon before or after.

In fact, there was a big jump in activity at the Russian Alfa Bank server in the Trump Tower around that time.

Plus Republican Trump publicly promised a few hours later that there would be damaging information given to the media within a few days. Within a few days WikiLeaks received hacked emails.

LakeArenal

(28,829 posts)
7. "It's hard to make the case that it was not collusion.."
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 11:30 AM
Jul 2017

But they already are and will try to make that exact case.

Moostache

(9,897 posts)
11. Veselnitskaya is a lead attorney in recent DOJ settled fraud lawsuit...not some "nothingburger"
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 11:41 AM
Jul 2017

The quid pro quo here is (as it usually is with this kind of criminal cabal) MONEY...

The Russians are getting paid in relaxed positions by the USA government on Russia, frayed alliances between the USA and EU and outright payoffs in lawsuit settlements EXTREMELY generous and favorable to Russian interests; Trump got paid in fat campaign cash funneled through emissaries in the USA on behalf of Russian oligarchs, and intel in 2016 and promises of more to the GOP in 2018 and 2020...

Everyone excusing this conduct is a treasonous bastard. Everyone guilty of executing it should be tried, convicted and hanged.

drray23

(7,635 posts)
18. It's everywhere in the news.
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 12:03 PM
Jul 2017

They are discussing it on MSNBC, CNN , etc..

Here is a Reuters article from a few hours ago : https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-agent-idUSKBN19Z189

they have since identified those two extra people. Rinat Akhmetshin Who is a lobbyist and former counterintelligence officer, the other a translator

Amaryllis

(9,525 posts)
20. Thanks - I just got online and this was the first thread i clicked on so didnt know how much had
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 12:09 PM
Jul 2017

hit the fan since last night! RAchel will be good tonight.

yodermon

(6,143 posts)
24. Let's stop using the word 'COLLUSION'. It's "conspiracy", "coordination", "espionage."
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 12:21 PM
Jul 2017

Throw in "bribery" and "Blackmail" too. "treason" in the small-t sense, not the legal definition.

"Collusion" downplays the seriousness of it all.

jmowreader

(50,561 posts)
31. Also his wife's, and his father-in-law's
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 02:04 PM
Jul 2017
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1999/01/23/husband-and-wife-sentenced-for-espionage/482abff1-0ba4-4914-9d46-69a82f3960d4/?utm_term=.c491a8adfbf0

In 1999, married couple Theresa May Squillacote and Kurt Alan Stand were sentenced to long prison terms for spying for the East Germans.

http://www.upi.com/Archives/1953/06/20/Rosenbergs-go-silently-to-electric-chair/5084629411212/

In 1953, Ethel and Julius Rosenberg were electrocuted at Sing Sing Prison for selling atomic secrets to the Soviets.

http://articles.latimes.com/1994-10-22/news/mn-53275_1_rosario-ames

Aldrich Ames' wife Rosario was sent to a federal license plate factory for five years and three months for conspiracy to commit espionage and tax evasion.

Sorry folks, but until we figure out how deep in shit these people are, EVERY member of the Trump family who currently holds a security clearance needs to have his or her access to classified information suspended. The 44 other presidents we had would have had their ability to work seriously constrained by losing access, but you need no clearance to tweet and golf and that's all Trump seems to want to do.

pnwmom

(108,988 posts)
32. AND the lobbyist has been accused of being a hired HACKER.
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 02:05 PM
Jul 2017
http://www.courthousenews.com/mining-company-sayslaw-firm-hacked-it/

MANHATTAN (CN) – A law firm and a man accused of being a former Soviet spy hacked into a mining company’s computers to get an upper hand in overseas litigation, the company claims.

International Mineral Resources, or IMR, claims business rival and fertilizer maker EuroChem Volga-Kaliy hired New York City law firm Salisbury & Ryan to dig up information on a business rival when a mining deal went bad.

The law firm then hired alleged former Soviet military counterintelligence officer Renit Akhmetshin to conduct an illegal hacking campaign, according to a lawsuit filed by the mining company on Nov. 12 in New York County Supreme Court.

The lawsuit does not list any direct documentation of Salisbury & Ryan or EuroChem asking the alleged former spy to hack IMR, but it claims that the law firm “reached out to Akhmetshin specifically because they understood that Akhmetshin could gain access to private sources of information.”

SNIP

drray23

(7,635 posts)
34. And yet the republicans will say
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 02:11 PM
Jul 2017

There is nothing there, just a coincidence. On top of it even pundits and sometimes dems preface everything by "if this is accurate" or "we need to investigate more", etc...


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Whoaa so now we learn the...