General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRomney's speech before the NAACP was intentionally racist ...
Why and how?
He intentionally attacked "Obamacare" expecting boos. He wanted to show his base that he was a "true conservative" and wanted very much to appeal to the Republican voters in the South. This was a Sister Souljah moment for him.
It was divisive and self-serving. He made no attempt to find common ground. He wanted the boos. He was playing to a specific audience. It shows a lot about his character or lack thereof.
madaboutharry
(40,212 posts)He is a slimy pig.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)immediately turns around and tries to invent a bond: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002932275
Clueless squared.
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)There was no possible other response they could have given to what Romney said there. It's not like they could have stayed silent. You wouldn't have if you'd been one of them.
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)Where did I say I was mad at the crowd.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)when you referred to the crowd "play(ing) right into his hands".
It sounded as if you were saying that the crowd blew it by reacting to Mitt's comment.
What I'm saying is, it wouldn't have been possible for them to remain silent. Nobody could have, in their position.
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)a selfish, greedy creep.
RZM
(8,556 posts)Despite the ACA's similarity to his plan as governor, his official position is that he opposes it and would attempt to repeal it if elected. This has pretty much been the centerpiece of his message lately. I don't see anything special about him saying the same shit for the umpteenth time.
kentuck
(111,101 posts)and saying that Ronald Reagan's "voodoo" economics should have a stake driven thru its heart never to rise again. Do you think he would get boo'ed? The only difference being that Romney did it for race reasons, appealing to his base in the South, hoping they will overlook his Mormon religion.
RZM
(8,556 posts)Whether or not he was going to get boos.
Not appearing in front of the NAACP would make Romney look even worse. It would leave the impression that he's either afraid to appear in front of a hostile crowd or so dismissive of the NAACP that they aren't worth his time. He pretty much had to go and face the music. He probably would have tried to get out of it if he felt he could. But he apparently didn't think he could.
As it stands now, he appeared, stated his positions, and that was pretty much that. I don't think his opposition to the ACA is any more or less racist today than it was yesterday or will be tomorrow. I see no difference between stating his positions in front of this crowd and stating them in front of any other.
I see where people are coming from with this argument, but I can't say I really buy it. It was just another day for the Romney campaign. The only difference was the audience he spoke to.
kentuck
(111,101 posts)Usually one will show some modicum of respect if invited to speak before any group, friendly or not. There is no need to make inflammatory comments when he could have spoken on numerous topics. It was intentional, I have no doubt. It was disrespectful and racist in its undertone.
RZM
(8,556 posts)Shocked, actually. But I guess they thought that was a lost semantic battle and went with the flow. At this point, while I still don't much care for the term, it's a workable-enough substitute for 'ACA.'
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002474777
So for better or worse, that's what it's sometimes referred to.
glowing
(12,233 posts)wants the history books to remember him by.... Like having social security and Medicare. I'm sure over time it will change and modify into a better program, but insisting that every American has the right to affordable health care.... Part of the life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness entitlements like civil rights, etc.
When the main part of this bill hits in 2014, it will be received well, in some states more than others, depending on how the states approach the ACA. VT'ers will probably like theirs a lot!! In the southern red states, maybe not so much. Already, the items that have been out have been well received... The limits GONE, discrimination for pre-existing conditions GONE, children up to the age of 26 being able to remain on parents insurance DONE, co-pays for regular health checks GONE, the medicare donut hole CLOSED, and when people start getting rebate checks from insurance company's, more people will be HAPPY!!
The Republicans know that their BS and lies are not going to hold up well by 2014. It is really important to have representatives who will move this country forward. It is important to re-elect President Obama more now than ever before and to try and give him back the House and maintain the Senate. Maybe then we move forward some more.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)nothing. The British thought they would disparage the colonists by calling them Yankees. The colonists successfully neutralized the insult by wearing the name proudly.
Two advantages to calling the ACA "Obamacare". 1. Obama gets clear credit. 2. It neutralizes the rights ain at making it an insult.
It worked for the Spice Girls (that name was originally an insult applied to them in the British tabloids).
mercymechap
(579 posts)the fact that we don't take offense but actually adopt it. Years from now Republicans will be saying "don't mess with my Obamacare" and there will be no denying that it was because of Obama that they got affordable healthcare.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)or any other issue.
He talks out of his ass on a regular basis. We don't know what the fuck he believes in.
RZM
(8,556 posts)Of course it wasn't all that long ago. But hey, we are talking about Romney here. He's in deep enough that he'll have to stick to repealing the ACA from now until November. Though if it gets more popular he'll mention it much less.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Mitt outsources EVERYTHING, y'know.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)You'd have seen the same response in the 1964 campaign if Barry Goldwater had spoken at an NAACP meeting and repeated his promise to repeal the Civil Rights Act by calling it the "Marxist Luther King Bill".
It wasn't the call to repeal the act...it was the baiting.
RZM
(8,556 posts)'Obamacare' has been mainstreamed and has even been used by he Obama campaign itself. I was quite surprised at that turn. I don't like the term and I don't use it. But it's no longer just a RW thing.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)He used that term here for a reason.
RZM
(8,556 posts)To me, this is shaping up as a 'sometimes a cigar is just a cigar' story.
Romney went out and said the same shit he always does. The only difference was the audience. While I think his opposition to the ACA is total bullshit, I don't judge him any differently for saying this in front of the NAACP. He used the same language and made the same points he always does. I don't have a problem with him not changing the message or language for the NAACP. I have a problem with his position on ACA, but not with delivering it to the NAACP the same way he does to everybody else.
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)for good theater here.
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)It's wise to first acknowledge that you understand that they have a differing point of view, before sharing yours.
If Romney had said something along the lines of:
"I understand that most of you support the Affordable Care Act (extra points for not referring to it as "Obamacare" just this once). I'm sure you also know that I disagree with the law and I appreciate your willingness to invite me here today to offer a different point of view on the matter. I oppose the Affordable Care Act because of (reason A, reason B, reason C, ....)"
That would have been how one addresses an audience with differing ideological views, if they're serious about trying to persuade them. Instead he went right on to demagogue the law the same way he would do at a partisan pep rally. It's clear he was speaking to the cameras and not to the audience.
RZM
(8,556 posts)If I were speaking before a hostile audience I would certainly take your advice. I would say something along the lines of:
'I know you disagree, but here's what I believe and why I believe it.'
But we're talking about Mitt Romney. This isn't the smoothest character out there. He's Mitt Romney.
You may be right that he was speaking to the cameras. But since when is a presidential candidate not speaking to the cameras? They do that all the time, right? That was the whole point of Obama's 'clinging to guns and religion' flap. That was an instance where he was most definitely not speaking to the cameras. In front of the cameras he would never say anything of the sort.
The difference is that I don't think Mitt's speaking to the cameras was about racism. It was about being consistent (i.e. 'presidential') and not pandering, which has been a weak spot of his for a while now. We're in the general and Mitt can't afford to reinforce the many (accurate) stereotypes about him. He has to stay on message in public from now until November. And that's pretty much what he did here.
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)Romney could have both shown respect to the NAACP and shown consistency by doing exactly what I said he should have done. The fact that he's not the smoothest character isn't an excuse when he has a teleprompter and dozens of aides writing his material.
Romney delivered that line to provoke a hostile reaction and you could see from his face just how uncomfortable he felt while doing it.
I don't know whether or not the intention was to fire up racist people. What I do know, is that his party's history on the issue of civil rights from 1964 to the present day is a fucking joke. And he's not doing a damn thing to change that.
MissMillie
(38,560 posts)"I'm shocked... shocked I say!"
MissMarple
(9,656 posts)They think it's cute. I think it's cheating. Who else does he cheat, how low will he go? Inquiring minds would like to know. I did see that factoid on the internets.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)MissMarple
(9,656 posts)It appears to be quite flawed.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Ishoutandscream2
(6,662 posts)And I concur. This will endear him somewhat to the racist, teabagging wing-nuts.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)I don't why people bothered. He's a bore, a liar, and clueless.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Were any of them swayed by anything he said, though?
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)n/t.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)n/t.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)"White barbecue sauce is a mayonnaise- based sauce that has grown in popularity. Originally known as Alabama barbecue sauce because of its regional use, it's moved on to a wider audience with barbecuers across the U.S showing interest in it. The sauce is delicious on grilled meats or used as a dipping sauce." from a different site
You ain't from Alabam, are you?
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)that was his message he intended to stress
Bluerthanblue
(13,669 posts)I'm sorry to say that I think you've nailed it.
This is disgusting - and believable.
liberalmuse
(18,672 posts)But true.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)This late in the campaign and he's still trying to win over the GOP Base.
By this time he should be trying to win over Independents.
liberalmuse
(18,672 posts)Thank you for your positive outlook.
mercymechap
(579 posts)claims that he was so overwhelmed when he heard the news that the Mormon church had abandoned it's racist position that he was brought to tears. He's such a liar.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)(mind you, Mitt probably thinks Donny Osmond was the lead singer of the Jackson 5).
mercymechap
(579 posts)heard of the Jackson 5!
ailsagirl
(22,897 posts)kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)caseymoz
(5,763 posts)I thought it was odd he would be talking to the NAACP. I don't think I've known a Republican to do that. He had no realistic prospect of attracting African American votes from President Obama. Anyone on his campaign must have known this.
So, yes, I think you're right. He wanted to get booed, the more the better, so he could increase his appeal to White voters. Make him look persecuted by African Americans.
All I could say is, if Repubs put half the imagination into policy that they do into race bating and pandering, they would have solved so many of the country's problems, instead of creating and exacerbating them.
Luckily, it seems that NAACP audience didn't react as the script called for. I praise their intelligence.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)They actually are fair and balanced.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Bush the First figured doing that and making it known that he wrote checks to The United Negro College Fund(he also probably liked the fact that they STILL use the word "negro" made up for the fact that he'd beaten Dukakis with the Willie Horton smear.
alp227
(32,027 posts)"Romney is very, very comfortable, it seems, with people who are like him. That's one of the reasons why he seems so stiff and awkward in some town hall settings, why he can't relate to people other than that. But when he comes on 'Fox and Friends,' they're like him, they're white folks who are very much relaxed in their own company."
THAT is why Romney is pretty much pulling stuff out of his rear when he claimed that black leaders "secretly" support him. In fact I would also argue this is his "Reagan goes to Mississippi and talks about states' rights" moment.
bobthedrummer
(26,083 posts)Mormons page from Ask.com (Wikipedia)
http://www.ask.com/wiki/Mormons
underpants
(182,826 posts)LOSER is the message that the masses will receive.
Bad mistake for him to go there an purposely antagonize them. Yes even worse than his photo op on the water and family retreat.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Newt made it clear that, if he'd been asked to speak, he'd use his time at the podium to bash the poor and to repeat the canard that poverty is a black thing(in truth, MOST poor people are actually white.)
mckara
(1,708 posts)to paraphrase Slim Pickens from Dr. Strangelove.
Incitatus
(5,317 posts)you are looking at him" - Romney
beyond parody
ailsagirl
(22,897 posts)Whether from mirth or "final straw," he really couldn't stop laughing.
JI7
(89,251 posts)markpkessinger
(8,401 posts)just1voice
(1,362 posts)It diminishes whatever good the NAACP does when they give war criminals awards and give repuke sociopaths like Mutt Robme a platform to speak:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAACP_Image_Award_%E2%80%93_President%27s_Award
2002 -- NAACP Image Award, Condoleezza Rice
2011 -- NAACP Image Award, Colin Powell
randr
(12,412 posts)All I could think of when I heard the parts I could stomach was that he was sending a wink and a nod to the wackos.
Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)He just used the whole NAACP for a prop to bolster his support with his racist base.
Speaks volumes about what he'd be like as Commander-in-Chief. GW Bush on steroids.
sfpcjock
(1,936 posts)of black booing him for Republican and Superpac fundraising and ginning up their base. I think it's a good point, too.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)I think this speech was intentionally racist and it was meant to leverage the vile talking points that are being spewed from talk radio right now.
Omg... It's exactly what they are doing!!! Today Rush Limbaugh said, "This used to be a great country where people strived to be millionaires and they worked hard and tried! Now it's just a place where people want to sit around and wait for their government check!"
Of course Rush is talking about people who need welfare and also those who want their free government healthcare--something for nothing!!!
These racist assholes set up this entire speech to underscore their racist, ignorant lies and statements. If the national news shows a group of angry African Americans who are angry because Romney plans to take away their "free stuff" Republicans can continue to point to this crowd as the perfect example of what us wrong with America. It's totally racist and it's a staged stunt designed to speak at all of the racists in their party.
These bastard liars on talk radio are suggesting that lazy freeloaders love Obamacare, and now they'll use theses images at this speech to show America an illustration of what these freeloaders look like.
And guess who gets lumped in with this group? President Obama. Do you stand with responsible, fiscally conservative Mitt, who just happens to be white? Or duo you stand eith Obama--the candidate for angry freeloading babies who get angry when you take away their free stuff?
See home that works? Listen to talk radio this week. I guarantee you that this will be the meme and that Mitt's NAACP speech will be exploited politically in this evil manner.
Republicans are ridiculous. We're the only Westernized country without national healthcare. The only reason we don't have it is because our cowardly politicians bow down to their corporate masters. When we take a few small steps toward decency and humanity when it comes to healthcare--these scurrilous Republicans would rather go crazy hysterical and act like lying, ridiculous drama queens--than do what is best for the people of this country.
We are the only modern country that lacks healthcare!!! It's an embarrassment!!
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)NCarolinawoman
(2,825 posts)Yes, he wanted those boos, and wanted the news footage to be shown far and wide.....and he got his wish.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Anyone surprised by it, should try being conscious for a few seconds.
He's a RepubliKKKan. It's what they do.
randr
(12,412 posts)He still looked sheepish in the attempt.
He is nothing but a fucking hall monitor, still pretending to have authority.
OverseaVisitor
(296 posts)David Zephyr
(22,785 posts)Spot on, Kentuck.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Showed America precisely who he is.
THAT was the REAL Mitt Romney.