General Discussion

All-In

(312 posts) Wed Jul 12, 2017, 03:48 AM Jul 2017

Jonathan Turley (Lawyer) Is Wrong About "Possible" Treason

Mr. Kaine said possible treason, not treason today.

We don't know a lot about "the meeting" now do we Turley?

If there was quid pro quo with Trump and Russians, and I believe there was lots, then what Jr. was caught doing "could be" treason.

Tim Kaine did not lose credibility pointing this out Mr. Turley. What would Russia gain by helping Trump? We can only guess what "the deal" was by the "Art of the Deal" mouthpiece.

Possible treason.

Now go away Turley. If I get in legal trouble you won't be my lawyer.

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jonathan Turley (Lawyer) Is Wrong About "Possible" Treason (Original Post) All-In Jul 2017 OP

Turleys been an apologist from get & instead of focusing on the whole collusion with Russia part he YCHDT Jul 2017 #1

YCHDT

(962 posts)

1. Turleys been an apologist from get & instead of focusing on the whole collusion with Russia part he

Reply to All-In (Original post)

Wed Jul 12, 2017, 03:59 AM

Jul 2017

... decides to go off on the minutia of treason which there's a possibility (like Kaine said) of there being such if DT Jr knew the Russians were screwing with election infrastructure.

These apologist are going nuts though ... that's a good thing

Reply to this discussion