Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 11:57 AM Jul 2012

Mormon discrimination against African Americans lasted until 1978

Early Mormonism had a range of policies and doctrines relating to race in regard to black people of African descent. References to black people, their social condition during the 19th century, and their spiritual place in Western Christianity as well as Mormon scriptures were complicated, with varying degrees and forms of discrimination against black people.

When the Mormons migrated to Missouri they encountered the pro-slavery sentiments of their neighbors. Joseph Smith, Jr. upheld the laws regarding slaves and slaveholders, but remained abolitionist in his actions and doctrines.

Following the death of Joseph Smith, Jr., Mormon leaders beginning with Brigham Young instituted a policy of excluding most people of black African descent (regardless of actual skin color) from Priesthood ordination and from participation in temple ceremonies. These practices continued in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) until the 1978 Revelation on Priesthood, which was canonized as Official Declaration—2.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people_and_early_Mormonism

Racial policy ends in 1978 Main article: 1978 Revelation on Priesthood

LDS church president Spencer W. Kimball (president 1973-1985) took general conference on the road, holding area and regional conferences all over the world. He also announced many new temples to be built both in the United States and abroad, including one temple in São Paulo, Brazil. The problem of determining priesthood eligibility in Brazil was thought to be nearly impossible due to the mixing of the races in that country. When the temple was announced, church leaders realized the difficulty of restricting persons with African descent from attending the temple in Brazil.[66]

Finally, on June 8, 1978, the First Presidency released to the press an official declaration, now a part of the standard works of the church, which contained the following statement:

He has heard our prayers, and by revelation has confirmed that the long-promised day has come when every faithful, worthy man in the church may receive the Holy Priesthood, with power to exercise its divine authority, and enjoy with his loved ones every blessing that follows there from, including the blessings of the temple. Accordingly, all worthy male members of the church may be ordained to the priesthood without regard for race or color. Priesthood leaders are instructed to follow the policy of carefully interviewing all candidates for ordination to either the Aaronic or the Melchizedek Priesthood to insure that they meet the established standards for worthiness.[67]

According to first-person accounts, after much discussion among the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles on this matter, they engaged the Lord in prayer. According to the writing of one of those present, "It was during this prayer that the revelation came. The Spirit of the Lord rested upon us all; we felt something akin to what happened on the day of Pentecost and at the Kirtland Temple. From the midst of eternity, the voice of God, conveyed by the power of the Spirit, spoke to his prophet. The message was that the time had now come to offer the fullness of the everlasting gospel, including celestial marriage, and the priesthood, and the blessings of the temple, to all men, without reference to race or color, solely on the basis of personal worthiness. And we all heard the same voice, received the same message, and became personal witnesses that the word received was the mind and will and voice of the Lord."[68] Immediately after the receipt of this new revelation, an official announcement of the revelation was prepared, and sent out to all of the various leaders of the Church. It was then read to, approved by and accepted as the word and will of the Lord, by a General Conference of the Church in October 1978. Succeeding editions of the Doctrine and Covenants were printed with this announcement canonized and entitled "Official Declaration—2".

Gordon B. Hinckley (a participant in the meetings to reverse the ban), in a churchwide fireside said, "Not one of us who was present on that occasion was ever quite the same after that. Nor has the Church been quite the same. All of us knew that the time had come for a change and that the decision had come from the heavens. The answer was clear. There was perfect unity among us in our experience and in our understanding."[69]

Later in 1978, McConkie said:[70]

There are statements in our literature by the early brethren which we have interpreted to mean that the Negroes would not receive the priesthood in mortality. I have said the same things, and people write me letters and say, "You said such and such, and how is it now that we do such and such?" And all I can say to that is that it is time disbelieving people repented and got in line and believed in a living, modern prophet. Forget everything that I have said, or what President Brigham Young or President George Q. Cannon or whomsoever has said in days past that is contrary to the present revelation. We spoke with a limited understanding and without the light and knowledge that now has come into the world.... We get our truth and our light line upon line and precept upon precept. We have now had added a new flood of intelligence and light on this particular subject, and it erases all the darkness and all the views and all the thoughts of the past. They don’t matter any more.... It doesn’t make a particle of difference what anybody ever said about the Negro matter before the first day of June of this year.

[edit] Critics question motivation of policy reversalCritics of the LDS church claim that the church's 1978 reversal of the racial restriction policy was not divinely inspired as the church claimed, but simply a matter of political convenience.[71] Critics point out that this reversal of policy occurred as the LDS church began to expand outside the United States into countries such as Brazil that have ethnically mixed populations, and that the policy reversal was announced just a few months before the church opened its new temple in São Paulo, Brazil.[72]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people_and_The_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-day_Saints

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
1. Well, that's quicker than Southern Baptists and other such evangelical sects.
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 12:02 PM
Jul 2012

Many of which not only kept African Americans out of the priesthood, but out of the church altogether.

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
2. I believe that Mormon racism...
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 12:08 PM
Jul 2012

...actually attracts some people to support Mitt.

They may couch it in terms like "Well... a church should be able to choose their membership." or some such, but that shit is all code for "screw the blacks".

I'm spreading the word about the "Jesus and Satan are brothers" and becoming a God thing on other planets stuff. And the White Horse Prophecy.

I don't care what whackjob religious beliefs Rmoney has... I find most religions filled with delusional crap... but I think the fundies and the blind Repub voters need to know.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
3. "Parden me while I whip this out."
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 12:11 PM
Jul 2012

Caving under pressure doesn't mean they accept non-lily-white people.

siligut

(12,272 posts)
5. I spoke with an AA woman who worked at the Salt Lake intl airport
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 12:18 PM
Jul 2012

She felt discriminated against, even though she was Mormon. She said that AAs came with the Mormons on their trek to Utah and felt like she was as good a Mormon as any of them, but still treated as less by them.

siligut

(12,272 posts)
7. She was so sincere and emphatic
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 12:36 PM
Jul 2012

Very likable woman and really hurt that she felt negativity from her fellow Mormons. I just tried to understand and accept her feelings; what could I say?

siligut

(12,272 posts)
10. More like get out of Utah
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 12:57 PM
Jul 2012

I can care about someone and not consider their problem mine. She needed to talk and I was convenient.

 

Indydem

(2,642 posts)
8. Are we all responsible for the actions that our churches take?
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 12:44 PM
Jul 2012

Does every single thing that a church does leave a mark upon it's members?

I hate rmoney, but seriously, this anti-mormon bigotry (because that is what it is) to try to paint him as something that he may or may not be, is a stretch.

People didn't like it when mcsame and his surrogates tried to pain BO as a radical black liberation christian, and I think trying to paint the mormon church as a devil clan that hates blacks and gays is not going to gain us any ground. Likewise, I don't think it does much to engage the base either.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
11. Mormon business people use
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 01:38 PM
Jul 2012

Tokenism as a way of hiding their racial hatred. Time and time,I've heard complains from job applicants about suttle bias in interviews. One major Home store in our town has been sued by non white employees several times and the store manager was reassigned and a out of court settlement done.

Had a HR person tell me,he had a quota or mix of people he could hire. Preference was given to people for the store managers ward and their relatives. Needless to say,when he bitch about changing this unwritten policy,he was busted right out the door. RIFed out.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
12. Was Robme still a bishop during this time? I know that Tim Russert tried to get him to talk
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 02:51 PM
Jul 2012

about his views and that of the Mormons, but of course, he danced around the issue:

Excerpt:

In a 2007 Meet the Press interview, Tim Russert noted that Romney was 31 when the priesthood ban was lifted in 1978. "Didn't you think, 'What am I doing part of an organization that is viewed by many as a racist organization?'" Russert asked.

"I'm very proud of my faith, and it's the faith of my fathers," Romney answered. "And I'm not going to distance myself from my faith in any way." But Romney also said that he had been "anxious to see a change in my church" and recalled weeping when he heard that the ban had been lifted.

"Even at this day it's emotional, and so it's very deep and fundamental in my life and my most core beliefs that all people are children of God," Romney said.

Pressed by Russert, Romney refused to say his church was wrong to restrict blacks from full participation. Romney's forebears were among the original Mormon converts in the 1830s, and Romney himself was a bishop in the church before he entered politics in 1994.

"For men like Romney, lifelong church members whose people were pioneers in the faith, to criticize church authority would be akin to heresy," said Smith.

Romney's father, George Romney, also faced criticism over the priesthood ban when he ran for president in 1968. He answered by extolling his civil rights record as governor of Michigan. George Romney, like his son, refused to publicly criticize his church.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/story/2012-02-01/mormon-romney-black/52920394/1

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mormon discrimination aga...