So far 21 states have refused to comply with the "Advisory Commission on Election Integrity."

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

Last edited Fri Jun 30, 2017, 06:41 PM - Edit history (1)

They are: California, Connecticut, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. Some of these are "red" states, so Sarah Halibut Sanders can STFU about how a refusal to comply must be politically motivated.

http://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/340289-19-states-refusing-to-provide-voter-data-to-trump-panel

[SamKnause]

1. Thanks for the list.

I am glad to see Ohio is on it.

[avebury]

2. I talked to a lady at the Oklahoma State Board of Election

today and she indicated that they would release the information as a Freedom of Information request.

[Tess49]

39. Same here. The woman who answered the phone at the Okla sec of state's office sounded

frustrated, to say the least. Said they've gotten a lot of calls. Directed me to the State Board of Elections. The woman I spoke with there said they will not give out SSN# or DL#s. All other info is available under our open records act, and can be found online anyway.

[WhiteTara]

54. I talked to a woamn here in Arkansas and so far

our SOS hasn't received the letter and is accepting calls to let him know the public's opinions. The young woman I spoke to didn't seem like she thought it was a good idea, but who knows what that means. Our SoS phone number 501 682 1010 should anyone wish to call him. Ask for the elections department.

Sorry that Crosscut has your records.

[TomSlick]

80. I checked the SoS website.

The form asks for either the DL# or "at least" the last four digits of the SSN.

The name and addresses of all Arkansas voters are accessible in an easy internet search. There usually is no party identification in Arkansas voter registrations since we have open primaries.

Arkansas has one of the broadest FOIA laws in the country (I know, right?). Unless someone put their full SSN on the registration (which should be confidential), I suspect everything in a registration form is subject to a FOIA request.

[BumRushDaShow]

3. Have been hunting and searching for PA and Wolf did finally respond! YAY

Link to tweet

TEXT
Governor Tom Wolf?Verified account @GovernorTomWolf

Governor Tom Wolf Retweeted Ari Berman

You can add PA to that list. We will not participate in this systematic effort to suppress the vote.

Governor Tom Wolf added,
Ari BermanVerified account @AriBerman
I'm now counting 18 states opposed to Kobach voter data request: CA, CT, IN, KY, MA, MN, NC, NM, NV, NY, OH, OK, RI, TN, UT, VA, VT, WA
4:20 PM - 30 Jun 2017

His earlier tweets on the subject -

Link to tweet

TEXT
Governor Tom Wolf?Verified account @GovernorTomWolf

I have serious reservations given historical suppression of voting rights and the Trump admin's false statements on the integrity of voting.
4:21 PM - 30 Jun 2017

Link to tweet

TEXT
Governor Tom Wolf?Verified account @GovernorTomWolf

During the campaign, then-candidate Trump repeatedly suggested wide-spread voter fraud in Pennsylvania without evidence.
4:21 PM - 30 Jun 2017

Link to tweet

TEXT
Governor Tom Wolf?Verified account @GovernorTomWolf

Even worse, after the election the President-elect said millions of votes in U.S. had been cast illegally while providing no evidence.
4:21 PM - 30 Jun 2017

[Tatiana]

4. Really happy to see Mississippi on the list.

Fingers crossed. If we reach 35-40 states refusing to comply, the ones like Oklahoma will feel significant chagrin (and possibly blow-back from their voters) for handing over the data.

[emulatorloo]

5. Really happy to see Iowa stood up to Trump. Thanks so much n/t

[Cha]

91. Wow.. Good!

[chillfactor]

6. very happy to see NM on that list.

thank you for the post.

[Matthew28]

7. Come on Oregon!

When Ok, Utah, Wis and North Dakota is on the list and not mine I feel sad.

[OregonBlue]

15. I talked to the SOS office. He has been out of town but told me there are only 3 things they can

legally reveal about their voters and even though he's a Republican the person in his office assumes he will not be willing to open the state up to a lawsuit.

[GallopingGhost]

48. Just listened to a recording.

They are receiving a high volume of calls from pissed off voters and a decision is still being "reviewed."

[Kittycow]

60. I don't trust him.

I think he's looking at his Sect. of State position as a segue into eventually becoming governor. He already lost that race once. His decision will probably be made with his own political future in mind and not what's good for Oregonians.

[central scrutinizer]

63. Me neither

He ran on some sort of "election integrity" platform. Code for voter purging and suppression.

[Kittycow]

65. Oh great. I didn't know that.

The only voter fraud in my recent memory in Oregon was a few years back when a Republican elections worker in Clackamas county got caught filling in choices people left blank on their ballots. The case dragged on and she only got a slap on the wrist. She claimed to be under stress or something

[GallopingGhost]

66. It'll be pretty damned disgusting

if Oregon complies with this Gestapo command.

[Kittycow]

83. Apparently he will only release what campaigns and pollsters

get for $500. The other stuff kobach trump wants breaks state laws.

I still don't trust him, however. If he lies himself into a governorship, I'm sure it will be bait and switch.

[lark]

99. yeah, I'm sad that the governor of my state is a teapublican and will absolutely release any info

allowed by state law. FL has some pretty strict privacy laws, but don't know how they are with respect to government inquiries? Bondi and Scott are both idiot liars who skirt the law when it's personally convenient, so no faith in them doing the right thing at all.

[Doreen]

102. Oregon has been confusing me lately.

They have been doing things that are good for the people then they turn around and do things that are against the good of the people. What is it with them lately? They need to chose one track and stay on it.

[trueblue2007]

127. OREGON is not turning over information to Donald Rump !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

27 states now opposing Kobach: AZ, CA, CT, IN, KY, MA, MN, MS, MT, NC, NM, ND, NV, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI.

[BumRushDaShow]

8. Copy of Gov. Tom Wolf's (PA) letter

Link to tweet

TEXT

View image on Twitter
Follow
Governor Tom Wolf
✔
@GovernorTomWolf

Here's my full letter to the Trump administration's Kris Kobach denying his request for personal information of every registered PA voter.
5:00 PM - 30 Jun 2017

[FakeNoose]

55. Our Governor Tom Wolf is awesome

Thank you BumRush!

Proud to be a DEMOCRAT from PA

[BumRushDaShow]

58. I was checking the state website multiple times today

looking for press releases and finally saw PA listed at the OP's link which included one of Wolf's tweets.



(and his mention about Corbett and "Crosscheck" was something I didn't know about so glad he brought that up too)

[calimary]

75. Sure sounds like it! BRAVO to him for a superb letter!

My governor (Jerry Brown) is another awesome example. I've loved, admired, and respected Jerry Brown since the first time he was a two-termer, here in California, back in the mid-70's. I'd vote for him for a THIRD set of two terms if that was at all possible. He will rock, in my view, til he drops.

[NBachers]

61. Perfect response

[Cha]

89. Gov Tom Wolf is brilliant.. the Govs/SOS of

the states that are turning over their Voters' Data are stupid.. sheep are smarter.

[BumRushDaShow]

92. I am hoping that because of the "bipartisan" blowback

this whole ridiculous effort will be halted and that stupid "commission" ends up disbanded. The commission is technically headed up by Pence and his mentality is to run the federal government like it is a state, where he can ram through draconian legislation and invasive policies.

They think they are fooling people but they have exposed themselves as frauds. They should be investigating why the hell the Russians hacked into our systems.

[Cha]

93. Fascistrumps are enemies of the state.. did you

see this?..

Link to tweet

BRDS

[BumRushDaShow]

94. Yup and at least Wolf mentioned the problems with Crosscheck in his letter

and our state dropped use of it. We use a different system ("ERIC&quot to do verification.

Ari Berman was on (I think) Chris Hayes' show last night discussing this.

[aquamarina]

109. Every governor

Should be replying exactly like this. Excellent letter.

[FuzzyRabbit]

9. Washington state should not be on this list.

Kim Wyman (R), Washington secretary of state, may yet hand this information over to the Kobach voter suppression commission.

Most of this information is already publicly available. Kobach could look for it himself if he wanted to, so why Wyman would waste her staff's time and taxpayer money giving Kobach something he can get for free is beyond me.

http://www.thestranger.com/slog/2017/06/30/25260306/was-republican-secretary-of-state-wont-rule-out-handing-voter-info-to-trumps-goons

[RainCaster]

105. Washington State IS on this list

Our SOS and governor are in agreement - this is a bad idea. http://www.king5.com/mb/news/politics/inslee-rejects-white-house-request-for-detailed-voter-data/453506744

[FuzzyRabbit]

117. Washington state voter information is already available to anyone who wants it.

Wyman, a Republican, said on Thursday she would consider the request over the weekend, but on Friday she tweeted the state will send the commission names, addresses and dates of birth of registered voters because that information is available to the public.

http://q13fox.com/2017/06/30/washington-state-will-send-some-voter-data-to-trump-commission-but-not-confidential-information/

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

10. I'd like to think it was my email to the Sec'y of State of Minnesota yesterday

that persuaded him (he was earlier reported to be "considering" not complying), but that's just Trumpian self-importance. And I'm sure I wasn't alone (and he probably would have done it anyhow). Makes me happy.

[tblue37]

11. Here in KS we are screwed. KOLBACH is our Secretary of State! nt

[BumRushDaShow]

14. The latest LBN says fear not!

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10141811608
---
Kris Kobachs Own State Just Defied His Bogus 'Election Integrity' Commission
Source: Talking Points Memo

By MATT SHUHAM Published JUNE 30, 2017 4:41 PM

The vice chair of President Donald Trump’s shady “election integrity” commission has added his own state to the growing list of states that will not fully comply with the commission’s requests for sensitive voter information.

That’s right: Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach will not hand over information to his own commission.

“In Kansas, the Social Security number is not publicly available. … Every state receives the same letter but we’re not asking for it if it’s not publicly available,” Kobach told the Kansas City Star Friday. It was a change in stance from Thursday, the paper reported, when Kobach said Kansas would provide all requested information to the commission.

Kobach added Friday, hedging somewhat: “If the commission decides that they would like to receive Social Security numbers to a secure site in order to remove false positives, then we would have to double check and make sure Kansas law permits.”

Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/kris-kobach-bogus-election-integrity-commission

[tblue37]

19. This F***er gave personal info from abortion clinics to Bill O'Reilly when he was KS AG!

IOW, he can't be trusted with "secure" info.

[BumRushDaShow]

23. I expect your state constitution has limits to this type of thing

just like here in PA and he finally got bonked on the head about it - e.g., SS #s (as if your state even has the money to try to defend the lawsuits that would result ).

[tblue37]

26. RWers don't care about bankrupting their cities or states with lawsuits for doing stuff like this.

Look at all the times they post the Ten Commandments in public spaces, have prayer or bible study in school, or push Creationism in science classes. They get sued every time and lose, but they keep on doing it anyway.

[BumRushDaShow]

29. But then the "States Rights" mantra that they have engrained in their minds

will cause them a horrible struggle because they don't like nor want the "big bad feds interferin'" (even though THEY are now "the big bad feds"! It'll be like cognitive dissonance for them.

[tblue37]

35. They don't care about states' rights of they interfere with the RW agenda. Look at

Sessions' intentions toward states with legal weed.

[BumRushDaShow]

44. But remember, they are only recently operating "from the other side"

Their States Rightsers buddies will be tough nuts to crack! When you have a state like Mississippi tell Kobach to "Go jump in the Gulf", that's what I'm talking about! They are too brainwashed and are anti-fed unless it is a social wedge issue.

[tblue37]

47. Well, I will keep my fingers, toes, and eyes crossed & wish for the best. nt

[BumRushDaShow]

49. I here ya! Let's hope the blowback means this request gets cancelled. 👍 nt

[tblue37]

51. +1. nt

[MuseRider]

107. I am pretty sure that was Phil Kline.

[tblue37]

108. Sorry. You're right. These RW SOBs start to blend together in my mind. nt

[MuseRider]

110. He did illegal things while State party head.

I think they did not pay taxes and took in illegal donations. I believe he left the party almost broke or at least still owing money and this idiotic state elected him SOS.

[alittlelark]

12. I called the office of Susanna Martinez -my Gov. to thank her.

She is a Repuke, and I could never imagine voting for her, but NM will not let Tr-ussia get ahold of our voter roles.

[Cha]

90. was a little surprised and delighted

to see that!

Mahalo, alittlelark

[Laura PourMeADrink]

104. Trussia !!! love that!

[Barack_America]

13. My POS Republican SOS in MI is going to comply.

[Duppers]

16. This is great. 👍

It's a significant update to The Hill's article I posted earlier.

[jpak]

17. OK? I thought head douchebag of the Commission was the SOS of OK

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

18. It's Kobach from Kansas.

[tblue37]

20. He is Kansas SOS. Maybe he got publicly embarrassed and means to stealth comply

when no one's watching.

[spanone]

21. the 'states rights' party demands you turn this information over.....such hypocrisy

[malaise]

31. Hilarious indeed

states' rights my ass

[FakeNoose]

82. Yes - the Red states have just as much to lose as the Blue states

Everyone should fight this and it should be taken to court. Maybe even the SCOTUS.

This is a DANGEROUS precedent. If the White House wins this there's no going back.
Why can't the Republican Governors see what a problem this is?

[Madam Mossfern]

22. I'm disappointed

that NJ isn't on that list.
But then again.....Christie.


Is he giving up my personal information?

[NastyRiffraff]

24. Anyone whose state isn't on that list

PLEASE call, email, snail mail, ANYTHING to your state's SoS. I just emailed Maryland's and tried to call but couldn't get through.

That so-called Commission is threatening to MAKE PUBLIC all information turned over to them. That's right; including your social security numbers.

[tblue37]

38. Russian gangsters are talented identity thieves, and whatever Trump's minions get will

he handed right over to Putin.

[Igel]

59. They asked for publicly available info.

With a list of what they'd like. But the first constraint rules.

But we don't want them together make public publicly available info?

It's like people didn't actually look at the request.

[NastyRiffraff]

111. Please don't be fooled by the "publicly available info" request

They WANT personal information, including "partial" SS numbers. (And don't be fooled by that "partial" bit either. The last 5 numbers are unique so the rest can be easily extrapolated.) They can get publicly available information themselves; they don't need to send out a letter asking for it. Many states charge for it, so they can pay for it if they want it badly enough. To my knowledge NO state includes SS numbers, partial or full, as public information.

They have said that all data collected will be made public.

[Squinch]

129. But for those states that do charge and their state laws require that they do give out info under

FOI (which I don't understand because why would that apply in some states and not others, but anyway,) those states should charge the fee for EACH record.

[NastyRiffraff]

131. Agreed, and I hope

their fees are VERY high.

[saidsimplesimon]

116. Thank you Riffraff

"illegitimi non carborundum", do not be discouraged, I like it.

Thank you for taking action. Resist

[Leghorn21]

25. SO many thanks for this list, Ocelot!! I'm to old and fried to compile all this and send around,

but thanks to you, I can now!!

[japple]

27. I feel sure that Brian Kemp of Georgia will want to personally deliver this info. to

tRUMP, just so he can kiss his ass in person. Brian Kemp, has announced his candidacy for Gov. of Georgia.

[47of74]

43. So would Paul Pate

[mdbl]

28. How Hitler-esque can you get?

The Advisory Commission on Election Integrity? This country is no longer a democratic republic, it's a banana republic. Any state that doesn't stand up to these control freak nut jobs needs to be over-exposed for their treachery.

[LuckyLib]

72. Yep. Right alongside Homeland Security and Immigration

and Customs Enforcement, and US Customs and Border Protection. Are we fascist yet?

[mdbl]

74. We were fascist under GW Bush

almost full circle now.

[Cha]

95. And, putinesque..

[smirkymonkey]

103. Very Putinesque!

The fact that the Trump administration even REQUESTED this should alarm anyone who is interested in preserving our democracy. This is one of the most frightening things they have done yet.

[malaise]

30. Does the Con know about

the 10th amendment?

corrected

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

32. 10th Amendment?

[malaise]

33. Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah

Ma just rolled in her grave

[ehrnst]

34. Good. It's the job of the state execs to put the brakes on this. (nt)

[murielm99]

36. I can't figure out why Illinois is not on that list.

[elleng]

40. Mebbe 'cause Illinois has it's head up it's governor's ass,

at the moment; it can't figure out where the hell it is.

[elleng]

37. Very pleased to see this.

There IS hope.

[calimary]

41. That's my California!

[Cha]

96. Speaking of.. Yay LA! Los Angeles City Council votes unanimously to rename southwest LA street

Link to tweet

[calimary]

113. And our mayor, Eric Garcetti, is a leader of a group of mayors committed to

adhering to the Paris Accord. DESPITE whatever trump might want, or want to do.

Our mayor here in L.A. is pretty damn sweet. #TheResistance !

[Lars39]

42. Wow, I can't believe TN refused!

[Lars39]

45. If your state has refused, take time to thank the SoS, too.

[sinkingfeeling]

46. I called the Arkansas SOS today and they said they hadn't gotten the

letter yet. That was the Elections department.

[raccoon]

50. K&R. nt

[QED]

52. Up to 24 now - even Arizona!

Link to tweet

[BumRushDaShow]

53. M$NBC (Ali Veshi) says it's now up to 24 states. nt

[blueinredohio]

56. If its bi-partisan who is on this commission?

[spanone]

57. it needs to be FIFTY

[Hieronymus]

62. Thank God, who'd trust Trump?

[Matthew28]

64. Where is oregon? WTF

[Gothmog]

67. 24 states now

Link to tweet

[defacto7]

68. First of all, half those refusing states are Red

But what's really stupid about this whole thing is the reason Trump and his cronies want this info. They say so they can cross reference the data looking for voter fraud. That's the stupidest most illogical reason they could possibly have to gather all US voter info. This can not possibly be why they want it. The states can do this themselves or already do. Piling it up in a new db on the Internet is utterly asinine.
There is some other reason... period. What it is... that is anyones guess and I can think up a lot of possibilities.
Any state that goes along with it even with the availability excuse is walking into something they will regret as will we all.

[Jake Stern]

70. Colorado SOS saying state law requires him to turn over this info

[old guy]

71. Wisconsin?

Color me shocked. I figured Wanker would hand deliver the list.

[HuskyOffset]

123. Anyone know why?

Fellow Wisconsinite here, also figured Walker would happily hand over the data. Wondering why WI refused, anyone know?

[old guy]

125. From what I gather

it would violate state law to give them what they want. They can get some of it under narrow circumstances but would cost $12,500. Check the Capitol Times as they have a item on it and explain it better than I can.

[McCamy Taylor]

73. Texas not on the list I see. They probably plan to "challange" the voters with Spanish surnames

before the 2018 midterms to keep the state red.

If you have a list of everyone who voted, then you know where to target your voter disenfranchisement.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

76. Texas is refusing to release private info but will release public stuff.

https://www.dallasnews.com/news/elections/2017/06/30/texas-will-releasevoters-private-info-trump-election-commission

[tavernier]

77. I wrote to Rick Scott

and told him NOT to give out my personal information to Trump!!

[lunasun]

78. That asshole Ruiner will give them Illinois I bet. . He will try to sell it to them first

Cuz he's not a politician he is a bizness man.

[HockeyMom]

79. Sorry, Florida, we moved

Voted in the 2016 Election. Born in the Foreign Country of New York. Hello, Donald?

Registered to vote when we got our Pa. Driver's Licenses. Is that still allowed? Showed our Out-of-State Licenses, BC, for me Marriage License, and two pieces of mail addressed to each of us at new address. Not ENOUGH?

Funny part? My husband and I got our Voter ID cards two weeks later. A month after that I got a 2nd voter ID card whereas my husband (Republican) didn't. I guess Pennsylvania wants to make SURE Democrats can vote???????

[paleotn]

81. Mississippi is about as red as a state can get....

so Sarah "cheeseburger" Sanders can shut the fuck up.

[MrScorpio]

84. Of course, Michigan is playing along with these motherfuckers

I'm not surprised at all.

[Cha]

88. Damn Snyder Bullshit.. Can't wait till

the Michigan Voters get Woke.

[llmart]

115. Embarrassed for my state...

I hope like hell that Schuette doesn't win. He's a Snyder toadie.

Time to write another letter to that jackass Snyder.

[Cha]

85. Nevada Is doing this...

"Information on Nevada voters, including names, addresses, dates of birth and voting history, will be turned over to President Donald Trump's election integrity commission, but the Nevada Secretary of State will not provide confidential information such as a voter's social security number"

http://www.rgj.com/story/news/politics/2017/06/30/nevada-turn-over-some-voter-data-trump-election-integrity-commission/443604001/

Dumbshits! Wonder how the Voters in Nevada feel about this obvious scam to rig another election?

[Vinca]

86. So is my state, New Hampshire. I just sent an email to the governor's office.

IMO, this is little more than a data collection operation for Dear Leader's 2020 campaign.

[Cha]

87. Right.. Mahalo, Vinca! "Data Collection" and

Purging Voters with the Orwellian "Ethical Election" or whatever Bullshit name they're pushing. We know they rigged the election... trump wants to change history and push the propaganda that he won the popular vote.

Wonder how the Nevada Voters feel about this?

[Proud Liberal Dem]

97. I was pleasantly gobsmacked about Indiana SOS denying the width and breadth of this request

We're a Republican-locked State at the moment and our Republican SOS and Mike Pence dramatically shut down a Democratic-leaning voter registration effort last fall in a massive state police raid leading up to the November elections- the outcome of which we have yet to hear about AFAIK.

I thought that we were supposed to have a secret ballot? The fact that Kobach requested actual voting records for people now makes me wonder if he knows something that the rest of us don't know about............

[Blue_true]

120. The person that surprised me was the Ohio SOS.

He came out in no uncertain words and said that his office would only send publicly available information that anyone could ask for. On top of that he pointed out that Ohio had looked at voter fraud three seperate times and found no real issues outside of minor errors in a few situations.

[Dulcinea]

98. GA should be on that list as well.

"Georgia plans to provide publicly available voter information to President Donald Trump’s commission on election integrity, but will not share information considered private under state law such as registered voters’ driver’s license numbers or Social Security numbers."

http://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/georgia-share-data-with-trump-commission-voter-fraud/g1cIww5anWQoeiDGbTwa9K/

[nikibatts]

100. Remember, they only need to suppress 4 of the swing states and maybe only to light blue states.

They don't really care about most of those who are refusing. It's an electoral college numbers game. Wealthy blues need to move in and take over.

[SHRED]

101. It's the swing states that count

That's where to watch.

[Blue_true]

121. I agree. But it is encouraging to see red states slap back at this. nt

[briv1016]

106. I have a feeling this is an intentional overstep. Expect them the quickly "compromise" and only

use district level data. They don't need to know individual votes in order to create new laws.

They've already written their recommendations anyway. 50 state voter ID and ending all early voting.

[Blue_true]

122. I really don't see early voting going away.

I see reduced days. Early voting is popular with liberals and conservatives.

[NastyRiffraff]

112. UPDATED LIST:

Arizona, California, Connecticut, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin.

Per The Hill (Updated July 1, 2017, 10:45 a.m.)

[ailsagirl]

114. States' refusals are representative of a larger issue

They're symbolically telling that clod to DROP DEAD

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

128. Governors and Secretaries of State want to be re-elected.

Turning over personal data that can be used for identity theft as well as voter suppression would not sit well with a lot of people, regardless of party affiliation. There might be a small percentage of dead-ender Trumpazoids who'd be OK with it ("Yes! Yes! You can have my name, date of birth, Social Security number, voting history, and the number of freckles on my butt as long as it helps prove that Dear Leader really won the popular vote, and if it makes it so only white people get to vote next time!&quot , but sending in that info could be a career-killer for many state officials.

[ailsagirl]

130. You're right about that!

[L. Coyote]

118. "... video explains how restrictive laws have already hurt voting rights."

Link to tweet

[Blue Idaho]

119. If a SOS says they have to release voter info

Because of the Freedom of Information act - tell them "Fine, then I am requesting you release the same information to me."

[frogmarch]

124. NEBRASKA

Undecided

A spokeswoman for the secretary of state said it's not clear whether the request has been received.

[pansypoo53219]

126. whew. WI is on the list. afraid the turd brigade in madison that stupid.