General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnd you thought New York City apartments were already small?
NEW YORK Maybe it's the urban dwelling of the future: studio apartments measuring no more than 300 square feet.
New York City planners believe the tiny units could be the answer to a growing population of singles and two-person households. And in a nation that's becoming increasingly populous and increasingly urbanized and where people more frequently are creating a family of one such downsizing may not stop here.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg on Monday invited developers to propose ways to turn a Manhattan lot into an apartment building filled mostly with what officials are calling "micro-units" dwellings complete with a bathroom, built-in kitchenette and enough space for a careful planner to use a fold-out bed as both sleeping space and living room.
If the pilot program is successful, officials could ultimately overturn a requirement established in 1987 that new apartments here be at least 400 square feet. ................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/09/nyc-apartment-size-bloomberg-micro-apartments_n_1660396.html
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)hlthe2b
(102,284 posts)since they will pretty much be working them around the clock anyway... Got to have maximal productivity, ya know.
TlalocW
(15,383 posts)They could implement his ideas although his Hong Kong apartment is 330 square feet.
TlalocW
xchrom
(108,903 posts)yes -- i know -- 'vivid' imagination. i should see somebody about that.
marmar
(77,081 posts)LOL. But does your insurance provider cover it?
xchrom
(108,903 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Lots of people live in motor homes and campers year round, the main requirement is that you can't have lots of "stuff" because storage is at a premium.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)DCKit
(18,541 posts)I live in 486 square feet, and I know... though I still like the smaller place. It suits me.
But the ventilation sucks as much as the AC, and our condo board sucks four times as much as either.
Atman
(31,464 posts)It has a kitchen with a regular fridge, and a bathroom (which I haven't yet plumbed, unfortunately). I could easily live there, although I suppose the 11' ceiling, skylights and 40' deck helps alleviate the claustrophobia one might experience in a 300 sq ft box in Manhattan.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Granted, we don't stay there full time. I could probably only get about one winter out of it if I was living there full time. But it's pretty amazing and efficient. The only problem is the condensation.
tibbiit
(1,601 posts)Amazing things can be done with 300 sq feet.
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/tag/tiny-house-movement/
I myself want to build a small house for retirement.
http://littlehouseonthetrailer.com/homes-plans-page/
http://www.tumbleweedhouses.com/products/sebastarosa/
Small House Movement is a good thing
tib
valerief
(53,235 posts)xmas74
(29,674 posts)The key to something that small is lots of storage and built-ins. The small house movement is taking place right now and they run between 550-650 sq ft. If an apartment is well put together a single person could get by on 300 and not really lose much. It's all about organizing and living a bit more simply, by means of not hoarding.