Do you believe that DT45 has recordings of his meetings, I do. For 40 yrs he

[CK_John]

was know to record all his business transactions, why would he change?

[jberryhill]

1. Just for score keeping purposes

The WH denial of the tapes is not a denial under oath.

[juxtaposed]

3. his denial was a tweet

[jberryhill]

4. Yes. But he still has to respond to the request for production from the House

[juxtaposed]

7. agree.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029240390

[trentwestcott]

9. He intentionally said "tapes"

Just as he was proven wrong semantically about being "wiretapped" (he was never wiretapped, however he may have been electronically monitored), he's probably using the word 'tapes' so that later he can say something like, "Oh, I said there were no tapes, I never said there weren't SD cards..." No one tapes anything anymore, that's just ridiculous.

[juxtaposed]

10. they will some day all go down in flames for there lying.

[trentwestcott]

11. Sadly I doubt it.

No one gets punished for lying, or at least no one important does. Some people are just to big to jail.

[C_U_L8R]

2. Yes. If he confessed to having a Comey tape....

then he'd be admitting to them all.... like the time the Russians were in the Oval Office.

[CK_John]

5. IMO, he has all his places bugged NY building, Florida and the WH, and Pence's office..

[janterry]

6. If he has them, they're in NY City

not in Washington DC.

I don't know if he has them or not. But his standard MO is to do what he's always done - so maybe.

[mazzarro]

8. I think he recorded the meeting with Comey but he has been

privately convinced to get rid of the recording hoping he would not be found out and if he is, then the repercussion will be more manageable comparatively.

[UTUSN]

12. I believe he backed off the COMEY tape because it supported COMEY.