Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Renew Deal

(81,875 posts)
Mon Jun 19, 2017, 11:16 AM Jun 2017

Is the London fire department equipped to fight a high rise fire?

It sure didn't seem so that night. I didn't see any ladder trucks raised. I don't know if they entered the building at all. They didn't seem to identify the cladding as the problem. Do they have the tools they need?

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
1. Ya know, my friend that is a county fire chief here said the same thing.
Mon Jun 19, 2017, 11:23 AM
Jun 2017

The panning and zoning people need to know where the fire protection stands in regards to a higher building. If the FD can't adequately fight the fire because of equipment constraints, then do not allow a building that goes beyond their limits to be built. A sprinkler system isn't enough by any means.

Wounded Bear

(58,719 posts)
2. Looked like a combination of that...and of a dangerously unsafe building.
Mon Jun 19, 2017, 11:27 AM
Jun 2017

From the few vids I saw of it, it looked like the building had now preventive measures and was clad in some kind of flammable materials.

As I understand it, there were numerous complaints of unsafe conditions that were not corrected before the fire.

procon

(15,805 posts)
3. I saw one ladder truck that was shooting a stream of water up at the building.
Mon Jun 19, 2017, 12:13 PM
Jun 2017

It was on video and the ladder didn't extend more than maybe to the 4th floor. I remember wondering at the time if ladder trucks were even capable of extending high enough to reach the upper floors and thinking the intensity of the heat still would have killed people trying to get down. Its a horrible tragedy.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,368 posts)
4. Yes, they did enter the building; residents said so
Mon Jun 19, 2017, 12:33 PM
Jun 2017

They made it up inside to the 10th floor, at least: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4614248/Firefighter-s-harrowing-account-inside-Grenfell-Tower.html

and that's also about as high as they could raise a hose, I think - see the pictures stamped after 4:20am at that link.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
5. Either way, there were obviously multiple passive and active
Mon Jun 19, 2017, 02:00 PM
Jun 2017

fire protections that didn't work as they should have, or didn't work at all...

No way should that fire ever have spread that far that fast...

Renew Deal

(81,875 posts)
6. Buildings like that usually have an isolated escape stairwell
Mon Jun 19, 2017, 02:20 PM
Jun 2017

Was one in place? Was it full of smoke? Did the AC system do what it was supposed to?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is the London fire depart...