Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEverything you need to know about Rosensteins possible successor
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Seth is on this like white on rice.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2701 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Everything you need to know about Rosensteins possible successor (Original Post)
orangecrush
Jun 2017
OP
Zoonart
(11,879 posts)1. WAPO Rosenstein sees no reason to recuse
orangecrush
(19,624 posts)2. I hope that is the case
However, if he becomes an important witness in the obstruction case, wouldn't he have to recuse?
Not a legal eagle here.
More of a "legal idiot."
furtheradu
(1,865 posts)3. Thanks for this!
Earlier, I read the whole thread.. It makes trump NOT filling positions look like a *brilliant* tactic..
They remove or recuse a couple, no one is left, to investigate.
Did it seem that way to You?
orangecrush
(19,624 posts)4. Yup.
Eventually they get down to someone they hope will get them off scot free.
Not that this will work in the long run, imo.