General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsReport: Donald Trumps UK state visit postponed - Could this be the reason?
Warpy
(111,277 posts)He can expect no love in the UK. The most he'd get is icy civility from people whose jobs depend on bestowing icy civility.
Sneederbunk
(14,291 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts).
http://blogs.findlaw.com/blotter/2017/04/is-mooning-someone-illegal.html
(EXCERPT)
Most indecent exposure laws, like California's for instance, require intent by the exposing party to sexually arouse, or sexually insult or offend. The Golden State statute broadly makes it a crime to willfully expose your genitals to someone else, motivated by a desire to sexually gratify yourself or offend or insult the other person. So if you're not trying to offend or insult someone with your bared buttocks, you're probably alright.
Even if you are trying to get a rise out of someone, the law also only applies to exposing one's genitals. Most courts have ruled that showing a bare female breast is not considered exposing your genitals, thus protecting breastfeeding mothers from prosecution on indecent exposure charges. So as long as you're showing your butt, and only your butt, it generally will not constitute indecent exposure under most indecent exposure statutes, including California's.
Cheeky Free Speech
In 2006, a Maryland court similarly determined that indecent exposure relates only to exposure of the genitals, noting that even if mooning is a "disgusting" and "demeaning" act, it was not illegal. "If exposure of half of the buttocks constituted indecent exposure," the court held, "any woman wearing a thong at the beach at Ocean City would be guilty."
The Maryland court also held that mooning is a form of speech, protected by the First Amendment. Relying on a 1983 case where a woman was arrested for wearing nothing but a cardboard sign that only covered the front of her body during a protest in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, the court ruled the man could not be guilty of indecent exposure, even if the mooning took place in front of a mother and her 8-year-old daughter.
(END EXCERPT)
.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)other than Putin and deplorables.
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)Response to L. Coyote (Reply #8)
zentrum This message was self-deleted by its author.
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)rurallib
(62,423 posts)which means shortly after he's removed from office..
Kleveland
(1,257 posts)Even if he is removed somehow, he will never be forgiven for the evil that he has done to this country.
I would allow him one last stab at really becoming a truly historic president.
Let him be impeached, and then charged and removed.
It would be a first in the U.S., since all other impeachments did not actually remove the President from office.
He can have that last claim to fame!
Go for it Donny! Do it!
Bigly!
lastlib
(23,248 posts)Different Drummer
(7,621 posts)dae
(3,396 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)davsand
(13,421 posts)If he leaves the US is it possible he might be arrested as a suspected war criminal?
Just wondering.
Laura
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)honored by many others!
zentrum
(9,865 posts)Trump, a media-idiot-savant, knows that such a set of images would be a huge TV event and absolutely crush his brand on said media.