General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDoes anyone have any idea how Greta Van Sustern's ratings are?
I caught the end of her broadcast the other day and she was begging people to DVR her show.
Ccarmona
(1,180 posts)Greta's the lowest rated show on MSNBC.
OnDoutside
(19,975 posts)MiniMe
(21,719 posts)yet, it will be a race to the bottom
spanone
(135,891 posts)did i mention she's dreadful?
TheBlackAdder
(28,225 posts)spanone
(135,891 posts)FSogol
(45,532 posts)Blindingly apparent
(180 posts)Skittles
(153,212 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)in the Brush Country of Wisconsin. Maybe she could work for Walker.
Wiseman32218
(291 posts)Would not turn on her show if it was the only TV available
panader0
(25,816 posts)Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)Lousy handicapping by MSNBC to somehow believe Fox transplants would expand their base.
I remember liking Greta during the Simpson trial on CNN. Once there's a stain it doesn't depart.
lindysalsagal
(20,741 posts)ears. There's just something about Rachel that you can't get enough of. She's so ernest, and girl-next-door, and she's got the rhythm and intonation needed to keep you listening to complex details. She can draw you through oblique connections of different sources. She can start you at a place where the whole history of an idea unfolds in perfect clarity.
Basically, you don't have to work hard to follow her, but she actually makes you want to grab her wave and ride along.
Rachel's got everything Greta lacks- and Greta doesn't know enough to know she lacks it.