General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWelp, that was a massive pile of bullshit.
Do you suppose he actually thinks he's telling them something they care to hear? He set up another bad guy (Iran) and expects, what? These authoritarians and kings to slap their foreheads and break into song? The backstage deals with terrorists to go away? The ethnic battles to stop?
That was a regime change speech with Iran as the "enemy." I have friends in Iran who were trying hard to back this country and create change from within to re-enter the global system, and are beginning to feel abandoned in their own fight, cannon fodder for a madman's ambitions.
He's a user. He's a despot. He's trying to use the Middle East as fuel.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,022 posts)nolabear
(41,991 posts)What's the gain other than propping up an image?
Wounded Bear
(58,721 posts)tavalon
(27,985 posts)dalton99a
(81,599 posts)nolabear
(41,991 posts)Not that they've, or we've, ever done otherwise, but he's such a tool I imagine they're calculating in ways he'll understand about as well as a hammer understands how the house is built.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)nolabear
(41,991 posts)bellmartin
(218 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,543 posts)while huffing and puffing and snorting.
nolabear
(41,991 posts)kskiska
(27,047 posts)was Stephen Miller, who also authored Trump's travel ban.
BumRushDaShow
(129,543 posts)"Radical Islamic Terrorism".
oasis
(49,410 posts)nolabear
(41,991 posts)He won't just say "kill them all," which pisses me off. There's no acknowledgment about what really goes on; they, and we, support whichever terrorists that we can profit from.
oasis
(49,410 posts)the educated assembly. Trump gets in front of a microphone and believes his audience can be instantly transformed into his deplorable minions.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)A thorough distortion of reality, from beginning to end.
luvMIdog
(2,533 posts)nolabear
(41,991 posts)He's like a kindergartener addressing a university.
luvMIdog
(2,533 posts)R B Garr
(16,985 posts)but it can't be done until it's safe for the white folks.
Didn't someone throw a SHOE????
samnsara
(17,640 posts).....I bet he had to pee....
Words he didn't write, values he doesn't hold, promises he can't keep.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)In fact, they were definitely pushing for a hard line speech against Iran.
Did you hear King Salman's speech? He basically said Iran is the source of all terrorism in the Muslim world.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,045 posts)SunSeeker
(51,726 posts)czarjak
(11,296 posts)Says what?
FairWinds
(1,717 posts)the Iranian ayatollahs are choir boys.
And yeah, the US Reich used to throw a total hissy fit
that Obama did not use the term "Radical Islamic Terrorism"
What amazing hypocrisy.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)and a hundred years ahead of Saudi Arabia.
I wonder how forgiving the Saudis would have been had they, and not Iran, been the object of Operation Ajax where the CIA deposed a secular and democratic Prime Minister, Mohammad Mosaddegh?
Or I wonder how the American people would be if we found out that Iran had arranged the murder of JFK?
Rouhani, who just won a landslide re-election on a conciliation ticket, got his Ph'd in Scotland.
It is hypocrisy at a level that makes you choke.
FairWinds
(1,717 posts)Shia islam does not really have much in the way of
a fundamentalist branch like the Sunni salafis.
In fact, and in contrast to the Sunnis, the Shia have
generally had a significant social justice component.
I'm no expert, but I read my Juan Cole (Informed Comment).
In part, this is what he wrote today . .
"Not only has Saudi Arabia stood for absolutism at home, it has mobilized to destroy populist and democratic movements in the region. Arguably it was a major force behind the derailing of the brief Egyptian experiment with parliamentary democracy. It suborned liberal Syrian revolutionaries into a fanatical Salafism (the Jaysh al-Islam) that threatened Alawite Shiites and other Syrian minorities and preached against democracy. Behind the scenes it has pushed a destabilizing fanatical Salafism throughout the Muslim world."
And there is also a VERY lively debate in the comments that follow his article . .
grantcart
(53,061 posts)This goes to the very core of the problem.
Shia doesnt believe in hierarchical structures that are run by strong dictatorial leaders.
Iran follows more of a principle of group leadership than that of a king or president.
It is this process of constant deliberations and discussions that can drive you mad if you are engaged in discussing anything with many Iranians. It is also the culture that gave the world the scientific method.
This is why the Sunnis have so much animus with the Iranians. They want elites talking to elites. Rouhani won by a landslide and represents intellectuals, moderates and conciliation with the West. The attempt to paint him as a terrorist will fail.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)Aviation Pro
(12,188 posts)... the fucking moron the difference between Sunni and Shiite muslims and watch the amusement begin.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)I had to wash my hair.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)He's almost gag-inducing to watch.