Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA 2016 Review: Theres Reason to Be Skeptical of a Comey Effect
note: while the Comey and especially Russian stuff should not be swept under the rug, and should be vigorously investigated and prosecuted, we also need to not use that as a crutch or excuse. There was a lot wrong with the Democratic party, and the Clinton campaign, and the country, before October 28.
Cohn's data analysis has been top notch, and in a lot of ways very innovative.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/08/upshot/a-2016-review-theres-reason-to-be-skeptical-of-a-comey-effect.html?_r=0
On Friday, Oct. 28, James B. Comey, the F.B.I. director, sent a letter to Congress about new evidence in the investigation into Hillary Clintons emails. Politicians, analysts and journalists are still debating whether the letter cost Mrs. Clinton the presidency. Its certainly possible. But I am not at all sure, in part because of the final Upshot/Siena College poll in Florida.
I had learned the results of our survey that morning. It showed Donald J. Trump ahead of Hillary Clinton in the state by four percentage points, 46 percent to 42 percent.
At the time, the poll looked like a bust. There wasnt much reason to think the result was even in the ballpark. Mrs. Clinton was ahead by six points in national polls and ahead by a similar margin in states worth 270 electoral votes, suggesting Mrs. Clinton was probably up by a few points in Florida. I cant say I was thrilled about having to write an article about a poll that looked flat-out wrong.
But its now clear that Mrs. Clinton was weaker heading into Oct. 28 than was understood at the time. Several other polls were conducted over the same period that showed Mr. Trump gaining quickly on Mrs. Clinton in the days ahead of the Comey letter. And the timing of these polls particularly the gap between when they were taken and when they were released has probably helped to exaggerate the effect of Mr. Comeys letter on the presidential race.
I had learned the results of our survey that morning. It showed Donald J. Trump ahead of Hillary Clinton in the state by four percentage points, 46 percent to 42 percent.
At the time, the poll looked like a bust. There wasnt much reason to think the result was even in the ballpark. Mrs. Clinton was ahead by six points in national polls and ahead by a similar margin in states worth 270 electoral votes, suggesting Mrs. Clinton was probably up by a few points in Florida. I cant say I was thrilled about having to write an article about a poll that looked flat-out wrong.
But its now clear that Mrs. Clinton was weaker heading into Oct. 28 than was understood at the time. Several other polls were conducted over the same period that showed Mr. Trump gaining quickly on Mrs. Clinton in the days ahead of the Comey letter. And the timing of these polls particularly the gap between when they were taken and when they were released has probably helped to exaggerate the effect of Mr. Comeys letter on the presidential race.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 2642 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A 2016 Review: Theres Reason to Be Skeptical of a Comey Effect (Original Post)
geek tragedy
May 2017
OP
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)1. more:
Most important, the polls taken before the letter were as bad for Mrs. Clinton as those conducted after it. Again, there arent many of these polls, but taken at face value theres a case that Mrs. Clinton had nearly or even completely bottomed out by the time the Comey letter was released. Even if she had not, the trend line heading into the Comey letter was bad enough that theres no need to assume that the Comey letter was necessary for any additional erosion in her lead.
These polls are consistent with an alternative election narrative in which the Comey letter had no discernible effect on the outcome. In this telling, Mrs. Clinton had a big lead after the third presidential debate, when the ABC/Washington Post poll opened with her ahead by 12 points and an Upshot/Siena poll of North Carolina gave her a seven-point lead. But her advantage dwindled over the following week, as post-debate coverage faded and Republican-leaning voters belatedly and finally decided to back their traditional partys nontraditional candidate.
These polls are consistent with an alternative election narrative in which the Comey letter had no discernible effect on the outcome. In this telling, Mrs. Clinton had a big lead after the third presidential debate, when the ABC/Washington Post poll opened with her ahead by 12 points and an Upshot/Siena poll of North Carolina gave her a seven-point lead. But her advantage dwindled over the following week, as post-debate coverage faded and Republican-leaning voters belatedly and finally decided to back their traditional partys nontraditional candidate.
We saw this during the campaign--Trump's numbers would spike down when he shot off his mouth and embarrassed potential supporters. But, they put a muzzle on him and his numbers recovered.