Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,075 posts)
Wed May 3, 2017, 07:22 AM May 2017

Kimmel Attacked After Saying Everyone Should Have Access To Healthcare Like His Newborn Son Did

https://mediamatters.org/blog/2017/05/02/jimmy-kimmel-attacked-after-saying-everyone-should-have-access-healthcare-his-newborn-son-did/216251


Jimmy Kimmel Attacked After Saying Everyone Should Have Access To Healthcare Like His Newborn Son Did
Blog ››› May 2, 2017 6:30 PM EDT ››› ZACHARY PLEAT


Several conservative media figures attacked late night TV host Jimmy Kimmel after he shared the story of his newborn son’s successful recovery from surgery to correct a heart defect. Kimmel used his personal experience to explain why insurance coverage of pre-existing medical conditions, which is lacking in Republican lawmakers’ latest attempt to replace Obamacare, must be included in any new health legislation.

On May 1, Kimmel launched a tearful monologue about his son’s birth the previous week, when two heart defects were discovered and one was fixed with surgery. Kimmel then used his son’s condition to criticize President Donald Trump’s proposal to cut $6 billion in funding from the National Institutes of Health and pleaded with Americans to support health insurance laws that cover pre-existing conditions.

Conservatives soon began their attacks on Kimmel for daring to speak about politics. Washington Times columnist Charles Hurt wrote an especially vile piece titled, “Shut up, Jimmy Kimmel, you elitist creep,” stating that Kimmel’s monologue “went horribly awry” for talking about “grubby, dirty politics.” Hurt described Kimmel’s plea to provide healthcare to children as a “slobbering wet kiss to federal bureaucracy,” and called him a “dirty, self-absorbed, narcissistic exhibitionist.” He also demanded Kimmel, “shut your fat trap about partisan politics and go care for your kid, who just nearly died, you elitist creep.”

Washington Times news writer Cheryl Chumley likewise criticized Kimmel for continuing “the left{’s} … uncomfortable habit of slinging around tears to get what it wants,” writing that Kimmel “loses the support” of people like herself who feel for a newborn child with a health problem, but believe that the “emergency care before Obamacare” was sufficient:

Where in America did newborn children not receive the health care they needed?

What hospitals in the country cruelly tossed a child into the street — a newborn child born with a heart defect — and called out, as the door slammed shut, “No health care for you!”

Fact is, Americans received emergency care before Obamacare. Fact is, too, Americans also received treatment from insurers for pre-existing conditions after a certain amount of time had passed.

Maybe they received bills in the mail for the emergency care, and for co-pays and deductibles for other medical services received — but not as large as the bills taxpayers and insurance holders alike are receiving now, post-Obamacare. Pre-Obamacare, the system was more free market; post-Obamacare, it’s a spread-the-wealth, subsidize the poor system.


The Daily Caller’s Jim Treacher also apparently had a problem with what Kimmel said, posting a reader poll on his blog about whether it was appropriate for him to use “emotional coercion for political purposes on a national comedy/variety program.” On CNN, political commentator Margaret Hoover criticized Kimmel's approach, saying it "massively confused the politics at hand and the policies at hand" before falsely claiming that high-risk pools would be successful in covering patients with pre-existing conditions under the GOP health care bill.
83 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kimmel Attacked After Saying Everyone Should Have Access To Healthcare Like His Newborn Son Did (Original Post) babylonsister May 2017 OP
Why are Republicans so anti-life? titaniumsalute May 2017 #1
They aren't "pro-life;" it's never about promoting life for them. eShirl May 2017 #11
Also, any women who has sex other than to produce a baby is a slut... maddiemom May 2017 #79
They go to church and fantasize about killing everyone - young and old - outside their tribe dalton99a May 2017 #17
That's what's supposed to happen to the "unrighteous". Girard442 May 2017 #32
Once they are out of the womb Soxfan58 May 2017 #63
That's why everyone should stay as a fetus and never come out of the womb. n/t Yavin4 May 2017 #68
What nice people. /nt yardwork May 2017 #2
loving, sincere, compassionate, caring, selfless......... lastlib May 2017 #60
Compassionate conservatism keithbvadu2 May 2017 #77
Proving Once Again That The Deplorables Are Really.... global1 May 2017 #3
It really is the perfect name for them amuse bouche May 2017 #41
Cheryl Chumley doesn't care about newborn children with health problems Renew Deal May 2017 #4
Absolutely pure selfishness. roamer65 May 2017 #5
I bet they call themselves "Good Christians with family values!" Dustlawyer May 2017 #24
Proving once again that "pro-life" has an asterisk attached to it. *In womb. Vinca May 2017 #6
I just call it "pro-enforced childbearing." (nt) ehrnst May 2017 #10
I've always thought pro-birth had a nice ring to it Phoenix61 May 2017 #51
I think "birth" focuses more on the baby - which they are not really. ehrnst May 2017 #62
That's why several people I know refer to their position as ... Virtual Burlesque May 2017 #78
Wow. That is disturbing on so many levels. PA Democrat May 2017 #7
Where does so much hate come from? madaboutharry May 2017 #8
Ignoring everything else wrong with these Washington Times bloviations, eShirl May 2017 #9
He is "elitist" because he wants care for the less fortunate. Dustlawyer May 2017 #26
They want to keep healthcare a privilege, like wealth dalton99a May 2017 #12
They want it to be a function of wealth. lastlib May 2017 #30
exactly bdamomma May 2017 #37
the right is a ton of pig fuckers. spanone May 2017 #13
Mrs. Hinkle! CurtEastPoint May 2017 #20
Bwahahahahaaaaaa!!!!!! spanone May 2017 #23
No self-respecting pig would fornicate with those creatures. lastlib May 2017 #31
Tapeworms have no redeeming... 3catwoman3 May 2017 #49
Kimmel loses the support of people like herself ... I doubt he EVER had her support. Despicable. OnDoutside May 2017 #14
Yes, there should be no emotion involved in kicking millions of people off of their health insurance Warren DeMontague May 2017 #15
Add Joe Walsh to the list duncang May 2017 #16
Hey Chumley re:Cancer jaxind May 2017 #18
duuuuaow... Gee, Tennessee! eShirl May 2017 #33
"Emergency room care" is the most expensive for taxpayers form of health care. Duh, Chumley. . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #19
This is where it sure would be Karmic justice if these assholes were subject to a terrible health still_one May 2017 #21
In their alt reality, "Lord of the Flies" is standard for today's Republicans. nt procon May 2017 #22
Everyone else in your insurance pool is obligated to pay for your goddamned health care, Joe. ehrnst May 2017 #25
Media Matters Hyped Story lefty2000 May 2017 #27
People can be attacked with words. I disagree that babylonsister May 2017 #55
The dictionary disagrees with you Renew Deal May 2017 #69
I thank my lucky star every day that I am NOT a republican. The abject self hatred is amazing. Augiedog May 2017 #28
Washington Times should shut down sharedvalues May 2017 #29
You have to be a heartless bastard to watch that and have criticism underpants May 2017 #34
Kimmel poped the lid off the can of crap the Republcians have kept sealed randr May 2017 #35
One word: deplorable. sinkingfeeling May 2017 #36
That's it in a nutshell. Such a perfect description ecstatic May 2017 #70
When did it become so patriotic to love insurance premiums anyway? world wide wally May 2017 #38
They confuse "free-market" with "freedom" because... Beartracks May 2017 #81
Deplorable lunasun May 2017 #39
Cheapskates ... GeorgeGist May 2017 #40
Republicans gonna republic. nt Tommy_Carcetti May 2017 #42
"post-Obamacare, its a spread-the-wealth, subsidize the poor system." HughBeaumont May 2017 #43
And they all drank some warm milk, and slept soundly on their bed of money. LakeArenal May 2017 #44
These attacks are so sad and are in such poor taste Gothmog May 2017 #45
Again and again...NO SHAME! VigilantG May 2017 #46
These people are absolute monsters. Initech May 2017 #47
RePukes want you to beg on kickstarter wolfie001 May 2017 #48
Even with Obamacare, there are peopel who can't afford the care provide for their loved ones... Demsrule86 May 2017 #50
Deplorable... Mike Nelson May 2017 #52
Not only are they heartless selfish creeps-they also don't understand the concept of Nanjeanne May 2017 #53
Conservatives like this surely do not believe in an afterlife ThoughtCriminal May 2017 #54
Just means they know how compelling his honest story as told was. karynnj May 2017 #56
Related to what Russell Brand talks about: Saviolo May 2017 #57
Yep. I saw something similar during the whole Colin Kapernick "debate." Neema May 2017 #64
Nice. Russell Brand is a clever guy. n/t Zing Zing Zingbah May 2017 #83
Narcissistic Creep? knightmaar May 2017 #58
I was puzzled by that as well. I mean, any criticism of Jimmy's heartfelt monologue is Neema May 2017 #67
Some damn seriously twisted mental gymnastics. knightmaar May 2017 #72
MSNBC panel just had a discussion on that. tavernier May 2017 #59
"Maybe they received bills in the mail...not as large as the bills taxpayers & insurance holders pay Grins May 2017 #61
Maybe its time to make phone calls and write letters to the advertisers of these firms turbinetree May 2017 #65
Late Night Comedy has been better at Exposing truth about Trump JI7 May 2017 #66
Reichwingers Are Vicious Idiots Leith May 2017 #71
so demanding health care for everyone is elitist? really? niyad May 2017 #73
So much for the pro-life claim by the Repukes Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2017 #74
fuck every last goddamn one of 'em.... dhill926 May 2017 #75
IOW, he should have sucked it up and let his baby die! It was defective! Warpy May 2017 #76
"coercion for political purposes on a national comedy/variety program" Beartracks May 2017 #80
I'm willing to bet... WinstonSmith4740 May 2017 #82

titaniumsalute

(4,742 posts)
1. Why are Republicans so anti-life?
Wed May 3, 2017, 07:24 AM
May 2017

I mean yes they are pro-life for a fetus and fuck you from the day you are born. I just don't get it. They even hate pre-natal vitamins.

eShirl

(18,495 posts)
11. They aren't "pro-life;" it's never about promoting life for them.
Wed May 3, 2017, 07:45 AM
May 2017

They are only anti-abortion and pro-"I-got-mine-so-fuck-you."

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
79. Also, any women who has sex other than to produce a baby is a slut...
Wed May 3, 2017, 09:47 PM
May 2017

if she gets "caught," it serves her right.

Girard442

(6,081 posts)
32. That's what's supposed to happen to the "unrighteous".
Wed May 3, 2017, 08:29 AM
May 2017

Says so right there in the Book.

Historical Jesus, if there was one, actually deserves some credit for trying to smooth some of the sharp edges, although not with much success, it seems.

Renew Deal

(81,866 posts)
4. Cheryl Chumley doesn't care about newborn children with health problems
Wed May 3, 2017, 07:36 AM
May 2017

And that is the point. She's just upset that people notice that the official position of the Republican Party is that newborns with pre-existing conditions should never be coverable. Cheryl Chumley Is the kind of person that thinks newborns with health conditions should have taken better care of themselves.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
5. Absolutely pure selfishness.
Wed May 3, 2017, 07:37 AM
May 2017

That is what is at the core of being a true Dumpanzee deplorable.

The planet would be better off without them.

Dustlawyer

(10,496 posts)
24. I bet they call themselves "Good Christians with family values!"
Wed May 3, 2017, 08:12 AM
May 2017

As long as it is only their family. If Kimmel was an average American and there were pre-existing conditions his son would not receive the 2nd and 3rd surgeries, that's how it works.

Phoenix61

(17,007 posts)
51. I've always thought pro-birth had a nice ring to it
Wed May 3, 2017, 09:37 AM
May 2017

Of course, after your born you're on your own.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
62. I think "birth" focuses more on the baby - which they are not really.
Wed May 3, 2017, 10:19 AM
May 2017

Childbirth describes the act of giving birth, and only applies to the woman.

They are "pro-anything that will serve as a negative consequence to a woman that has sex and doesn't want bear a child"

PA Democrat

(13,225 posts)
7. Wow. That is disturbing on so many levels.
Wed May 3, 2017, 07:39 AM
May 2017

People DIED waiting for coverage for preexisting conditions. Medical bills were the primary cause of personal bankruptcy. Emergency rooms don't perform chemotherapy or life-saving surgeries. The first thing you get asked when you show up at ANY hospital is how you are going to pay.

And the majority of these hypocrites will claim they are "pro-life."

eShirl

(18,495 posts)
9. Ignoring everything else wrong with these Washington Times bloviations,
Wed May 3, 2017, 07:43 AM
May 2017

what in the hell about what Kimmel talked about was elitist? I mean WTF, it was exactly the opposite.

lastlib

(23,257 posts)
30. They want it to be a function of wealth.
Wed May 3, 2017, 08:24 AM
May 2017

Something you have to earn by labor (service to the masters), and then you can only get what you can pay for. In GOPeeWorld, compassion correlates to checking account.

bdamomma

(63,907 posts)
37. exactly
Wed May 3, 2017, 08:55 AM
May 2017

some Repigs believe healthcare should not be a right but a privilege, I say fuck them.

They come right out say it, saying Americans don't know how to take care of themselves. Like

lastlib

(23,257 posts)
31. No self-respecting pig would fornicate with those creatures.
Wed May 3, 2017, 08:26 AM
May 2017

Can't we find a lower animal? Sea urchins?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
15. Yes, there should be no emotion involved in kicking millions of people off of their health insurance
Wed May 3, 2017, 07:48 AM
May 2017

It's jus' bizness, see.

No, emotion should be reserved for that in life which is truly meaningful; the soul-affirming counting of cold, crisp, lovely lovely green stacks of bills, and the tear-inducing moment of life-affirming joy when you look at a brokerage statement.



duncang

(1,907 posts)
16. Add Joe Walsh to the list
Wed May 3, 2017, 07:48 AM
May 2017

A tea party congress critter from Illinois who went to being a radio talk host after his loss to Tammy Duckworth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Walsh_(Illinois_politician)

He's catching it on twitter right now. Mostly about his court problems on child support.

jaxind

(1,074 posts)
18. Hey Chumley re:Cancer
Wed May 3, 2017, 07:50 AM
May 2017

Hey Chumley, how does an emergency care visit help a child who, let's say, has cancer??!

still_one

(92,280 posts)
21. This is where it sure would be Karmic justice if these assholes were subject to a terrible health
Wed May 3, 2017, 07:56 AM
May 2017

consequence, and their health insurance wouldn't cover it. Unfortunately, the hate overpowers these ignoramus selfish assholes, and it is doubtful they would change their perspective:

When Michael Moore Paid For Jim Kenefic's, Medical Premiums Anonymously to cover his stricken wives illness, he initially responded with the following:

“Someone e-mailed me and asked if an ‘anonymous’ benefactor could offer to pay my first year’s premiums – $12,000. I opened a whole new account at my bank, waited for it to clear, checked twice with bank personnel to make sure it wasn’t a scam, and waited a full 60 days before spending the money. At that time, I started drawing on it and paying the monthly premiums until it was gone.”

“[The money] was like manna from heaven at that time. … My business was almost dead, my wife was very, very ill, and I was racking up a few little health problems of my own. That money made it possible for us to begin to turn our lives around.”

........

"So after all this uproar over Michael Moore baiting him, how did he respond to the million dollar question of “why did you take the money, then?” Well….

“I’m not an idiot. I know when to say yes to something, even if the string attached is obvious. What kind of moron turns down a free 12 grand?”

So he hates Michael Moore, he hates the fact that Moore only did this to make him a puppet, but he’ll take his “free” money. Wow, this is almost too much irony to handle.

This is what separates liberal from conservatives. While Kenefick’s conservative supporters did virtually nothing to help, a liberal was generous enough to donate the money to help an individual in need."

http://addictinginfo.com/2015/07/25/that-time-michael-moore-paid-for-his-critics-medical-premiums-anonymously/

This is the mindset we are dealing with

and while this may sound cruel, those right wing assholes who do not believe that healthcare should be a RIGHT, deserve any misfortune that happens to them













 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
25. Everyone else in your insurance pool is obligated to pay for your goddamned health care, Joe.
Wed May 3, 2017, 08:14 AM
May 2017

Including taxpayers when you were in office.

THAT IS HOW HEALTH CARE COVERAGE WORKS, ASSHOLE.

lefty2000

(177 posts)
27. Media Matters Hyped Story
Wed May 3, 2017, 08:15 AM
May 2017

Based on the story itself, I was relieved to learn that Jimmy was not "attacked." He was slandered, he was maligned, lambasted, excoriated. I am not sure what the right word is, but it is not "attacked" which could be misunderstood. For just a moment, I thought he might have been attacked. Media Matters should not sensationalize what conservative commentators say. Let them "hang" themselves with their own rope.

babylonsister

(171,075 posts)
55. People can be attacked with words. I disagree that
Wed May 3, 2017, 09:49 AM
May 2017

MM hyped this. The quotes are there and it sounds like a verbal attack to me.

Renew Deal

(81,866 posts)
69. The dictionary disagrees with you
Wed May 3, 2017, 12:30 PM
May 2017
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/attack

verb (used with object)
1.
to set upon in a forceful, violent, hostile, or aggressive way, with or without a weapon; begin fighting with:
He attacked him with his bare hands.
2.
to begin hostilities against; start an offensive against:
to attack the enemy.
3.
to blame or abuse violently or bitterly.
4.
to direct unfavorable criticism against; criticize severely; argue with strongly:
He attacked his opponent's statement.
5.
to try to destroy, especially with verbal abuse:
to attack the mayor's reputation.
6.
to set about (a task) or go to work on (a thing) vigorously:
to attack housecleaning; to attack the hamburger hungrily.
7.
(of disease, destructive agencies, etc.) to begin to affect.
verb (used without object)
8.
to make an attack; begin hostilities.
noun
9.
the act of attacking; onslaught; assault.
10.
a military offensive against an enemy or enemy position.
11.
Pathology. seizure by disease or illness:
an attack of indigestion.
12.
the beginning or initiating of any action; onset.
13.
an aggressive move in a performance or contest.
14.
the approach or manner of approach in beginning a musical phrase

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
29. Washington Times should shut down
Wed May 3, 2017, 08:19 AM
May 2017

Those columns are more than embarrassing, they are hateful and have no place in America.
Move the Washington Times to an autocratic country where such hate supporting the regime will be embraced.

randr

(12,412 posts)
35. Kimmel poped the lid off the can of crap the Republcians have kept sealed
Wed May 3, 2017, 08:46 AM
May 2017

He made it very clear, for once, what the debate is really about. I hope Democrats can pick up on this as it gets to the heart of the debate. Kimmel made very clear that the Republican health plan is all about denying care to people they look down on.

Beartracks

(12,819 posts)
81. They confuse "free-market" with "freedom" because...
Wed May 3, 2017, 11:40 PM
May 2017

... it has the text string "free" in it.

===================

Initech

(100,088 posts)
47. These people are absolute monsters.
Wed May 3, 2017, 09:16 AM
May 2017

And the GOP got their underwear in a wad yesterday over what Colbert said. Give me a fucking break. These people are so fucking heartless and cruel.

wolfie001

(2,263 posts)
48. RePukes want you to beg on kickstarter
Wed May 3, 2017, 09:19 AM
May 2017

They really are fucking despicable. Yes, I'm talking about those fucking Drumpf supporters.

Demsrule86

(68,618 posts)
50. Even with Obamacare, there are peopel who can't afford the care provide for their loved ones...
Wed May 3, 2017, 09:21 AM
May 2017

and millions don't have insurance since the evil GOP did not expand healthcare and some states have capped Medicare too...I have no doubt there were people at the hospital who could not afford to save their kids' life or were ruined by the attempt. Hospitals only have to stabilize by. They do not have provide expensive care. Thank you Jimmy Kimmel...you are wonderful to call the evil ones out.

Nanjeanne

(4,969 posts)
53. Not only are they heartless selfish creeps-they also don't understand the concept of
Wed May 3, 2017, 09:43 AM
May 2017

Last edited Wed May 3, 2017, 11:44 AM - Edit history (1)

INSURANCE.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
56. Just means they know how compelling his honest story as told was.
Wed May 3, 2017, 09:51 AM
May 2017

Not to mention, it brings front and center what medical services mean - life or death and, emergency services notwithstanding- there are millions of stories that are not as public, but for which passing the Republican bill means leaving people to die or live marginalized lives. Here, if Kimmel could not pay and did not have insurance, this care might still have been done -- but what of the two future medical operations Kimmel spoke of. Optimally, they should be done based on when the son's health defines - meaning they will not be emergencies, if all goes well. THAT is when the fact that they are a pre-existing condition comes into play.

As to "emotional coercion" --- what the hell was everything Trump did with regards to refugees and immigrants? That was far more emotion and disregarding the facts.

Saviolo

(3,282 posts)
57. Related to what Russell Brand talks about:
Wed May 3, 2017, 09:59 AM
May 2017



They're accusing Kimmel of being elitist for standing up for the rights of people less fortunate than him. Er... what? Not that you can argue with facts to these mouth breathers, it just bounces off their closed little minds without making any impact whatsoever.

This comment is particularly telling:

Maybe they received bills in the mail for the emergency care, and for co-pays and deductibles for other medical services received — but not as large as the bills taxpayers and insurance holders alike are receiving now, post-Obamacare. Pre-Obamacare, the system was more free market; post-Obamacare, it’s a spread-the-wealth, subsidize the poor system.


Do they really have no figures on the number of lives ruined by sudden emergency care costs? By families bankrupted by an illness or their car being hit by a drunk driver? Once again, facts will have no effect on these people.

Neema

(1,151 posts)
64. Yep. I saw something similar during the whole Colin Kapernick "debate."
Wed May 3, 2017, 10:28 AM
May 2017

White people: "Black people should protest peacefully!"
*Black person sits quietly during national anthem*
White people: "No not like that."

knightmaar

(748 posts)
58. Narcissistic Creep?
Wed May 3, 2017, 10:00 AM
May 2017

"That bastard wants all babies to have the same level of care his baby had. What a selfish prick!"

You know, I don't think these people know what words mean.

Neema

(1,151 posts)
67. I was puzzled by that as well. I mean, any criticism of Jimmy's heartfelt monologue is
Wed May 3, 2017, 10:38 AM
May 2017

beyond ridiculous IMHO anyway, but "narcissistic creep" is a head-scratcher. They're just throwing out random insults at that point. They probably just keep an insult generator app open on their phones.

knightmaar

(748 posts)
72. Some damn seriously twisted mental gymnastics.
Wed May 3, 2017, 01:21 PM
May 2017

"Logic"
Kimmel wants healthcare for all.
Kimmel's son gets sick.
Kimmel's son gets healed because Kimmel has a rich man's health plan.
Kimmel cynically uses his son's illness to stump for healthcare for all.
Therefore, Kimmel is selfish.

If you're enough of a narrow-minded prick that you don't draw any connection between "healthcare for all" and "Billy's illness", then it looks like Kimmel is manipulating his Billy's illness to promote a political goal.

What's stupid is that "Billy's illness" and the resulting healing is directly applicable to "healthcare for all."

tavernier

(12,394 posts)
59. MSNBC panel just had a discussion on that.
Wed May 3, 2017, 10:03 AM
May 2017

They all agreed that these responses were not going to endear the public to the repubs, and anger many.

Grins

(7,221 posts)
61. "Maybe they received bills in the mail...not as large as the bills taxpayers & insurance holders pay
Wed May 3, 2017, 10:14 AM
May 2017
"Maybe they received bills in the mail for the emergency care..."

Maybe? Care to go to Vegas and bet me some real money on that one?

"...but not as large as the bills taxpayers and insurance holders alike are receiving now, post-Obamacare."

A 30-year old woman had a cardiac arrest and was rushed to a hospital. Ten days in a coma and technically dead. She lived. Then she got a $254,000 bill from the hospital. And she WAS INSURED! But because the hospital she was taken to was an out-of-network hospital, she was not covered. She almost died again. Facing bankruptcy she had to put off getting married until her financial situation is resolved.

A teacher cut his finger and went to the emergency room to ask whether he should get stitches. The nurse practitioner determined no stitches were necessary, and no X-ray were required. For that he was hit with an $8,200 bill for the emergency room visit, PLUS $180 for a tetanus shot, PLUS $242 for sterile supplies, PLUS $8 for some antibacterial ointment, PLUS hundreds of dollars for the services of the nurse practitioner. Almost $9,000. For a band-aide.

A mother in Texas thought she had strep throat and went to a local clinic where she was treated with an injection and given a prescription for antibiotics. Her bill: $8,196. For a shot and a prescription (just for the prescription, not the drug itself - that was extra.)

An Arizona woman was stung by a scorpion soon could not walk and had trouble breathing. She went to the hospital that charged her $39,652 - per dose - for the antivenom. She received two doses during her three-hour stay (i.e., $79,304.) Her insurer paid the hospital $57,509. The hospital then demanded she pay the $25,537 balance, PLUS another $1,302 for the hospital's emergency-room physician (i.e., $26,839.) (N.B.: The antivenom for which she was charged $39,652 a dose? It is made in Mexico where it costs - $100 per dose.)

$254,000 for being taken to the wrong hospital. $9,000 for a band-aide. $8,196 for a shot and prescription. $26,839 for two shots and three hours of observation.

So tell me again about those bills that are "...not as large as the bills taxpayers and insurance holders alike are receiving now, post-Obamacare."

turbinetree

(24,709 posts)
65. Maybe its time to make phone calls and write letters to the advertisers of these firms
Wed May 3, 2017, 10:35 AM
May 2017

since its is after all about money for there survival ..


FUCK THESE ASSHOLES

Think if someone were to call the "Washington Times" and ask if Ms. Chumley , Charles Hurt do you know how many premature babies that are born and die in this country in fact?

Here google she and he would come up with this fact:

http://www.marchofdimes.org/mission/global-preterm.aspx


And guess what Ms. Chumley, Charles Hurt, if the baby dies, you still have to pay the bill, ever think of that reality, and just gotta ask do you donate to the March of Dimes?









Leith

(7,813 posts)
71. Reichwingers Are Vicious Idiots
Wed May 3, 2017, 12:43 PM
May 2017

How can anyone attack a father who nearly lost his newborn son and is facing future operations?

And that father wants all families to get health care as good as his family got - how the fuck is that elitist?!

I will never understand that kind of person. I don't even want to.

Warpy

(111,300 posts)
76. IOW, he should have sucked it up and let his baby die! It was defective!
Wed May 3, 2017, 04:21 PM
May 2017

That's what these miserable excuses for human beings are saying.

People should be boiling tar and collecting feathers for these men.

Beartracks

(12,819 posts)
80. "coercion for political purposes on a national comedy/variety program"
Wed May 3, 2017, 11:34 PM
May 2017

Isn't that Limbaugh's excuse: "I'm just an entertainer!"

What's good for the goose, you conservative elitists.

=============

WinstonSmith4740

(3,056 posts)
82. I'm willing to bet...
Thu May 4, 2017, 11:35 AM
May 2017

These are the same "people" who howled when Hillary called them "deplorable". They are truly horrible excuses as human beings. I'm not even sure they would change if the kind of stuff Jimmy Kimmel was talking about DID happen to them or someone they loved. They worship Ayn Rand and money. Period.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kimmel Attacked After Say...