General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEMAILS REVEAL FBI, JUSTICE PROBE OF BURLINGTON COLLEGE. ( Jane Sanders )
Good grief! It looks like another cover up is going on.
https://vtdigger.org/2017/04/27/emails-reveal-fbi-justice-probe-burlington-college/
nikibatts
(2,198 posts)OnDoutside
(19,972 posts)still has questions to answer and shouldn't be allowed run until he comes clean.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)financial reform is one of her big issues....
OnDoutside
(19,972 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... I wonder why. There must be some logical and reasonable explanation.
OnDoutside
(19,972 posts)isn't a big deal in Vermont but would be embarrassing nationally.
And his excuse was that Jane did his taxes but didn't have the time because of their campaigning.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... of how bad it looks, and that in general, the public always assume the worst. They're not stupid, so obviously they know this.
So, that makes me wonder (again, I don't know, but I wonder) whether someone has made a calculated risk and decided that having the public "not-know-and-assume-the-worst" is somehow better than having the public ACTUALLY KNOW the truth.
For and experienced lifelong establishment politician like Bernie, this certainly (in my opinion) is very odd and it makes me curious what's going on.
These are just my opinions and my questions.
OnDoutside
(19,972 posts)going to be an issue until the next Presidential run, if he does run. You can be certainly that it would be a huge issue then though, after Trump's failure to show his taxes. I would be quite sure that there will be a law brought in, barring anyone from running without having first produced their last 10/15 years of taxes.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)tax forms and financials.
I would think that releasing them would be a no-brainer for someone who is making financial transparency a tentpole of their political career.
OnDoutside
(19,972 posts)on the Republican side. I think it needs to be put into law so they can't weasel out of it when it suits them.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 28, 2017, 03:43 PM - Edit history (2)
I doubt it will make it into law in the current administration.
But at least our candidates being required to release the documents will cause those with something to hide in those returns to self select out of seeking the nomination.
OnDoutside
(19,972 posts)the aim should be to make it law. Obviously it won't happen this side of the midterms..... Fingers crossed !!!
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)in presidential elections in that state, a candidate must release tax returns.
So hopefully that will make it unnecessary to make it federal law to keep the kind of candidate that refuses basic transparency of their own finances out of the running on any ticket. From any party. Because really, what normal, ethical reason would there be to refuse?
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/14/opinions/state-laws-requiring-tax-return-disclosure-legal-tribe-painter-eisen/
OnDoutside
(19,972 posts)frankieallen
(583 posts)on this, so they would have to have it apply to anyone running for public office (federal),or appear hypocritical.
I bet there are plenty of congress critters on both sides that would rather not put there tax returns on the internet for all to see.
OnDoutside
(19,972 posts)residential candidates.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)I have to wonder if Sierra Blanca was the embarassing issue.
Omaha Steve
(99,727 posts)Seems there is a precedent on taxes, spouses, back taxes after running for office!
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,727 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)It appears that John Zaccaro is still alive.
George II
(67,782 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... but I thought that would have been very odd, so I poked around some more until I found out more.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Response to Omaha Steve (Reply #56)
George II This message was self-deleted by its author.
Omaha Steve
(99,727 posts)tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,212 posts)and thought that was enough.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Warren releases hers, and has since 2008 when she was elected, and Corey Booker released 15 years worth when he ran for Senate.
Schumer and Gillibrand release theirs.
"The tax return is the lowest ethical bar that you can have for a presidential nominee or a president," said Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, top Senate Finance Democrat who introduced legislation in January requiring nominees and sitting presidents to disclose their returns."
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-taxreturns-idUSKBN1685TP
George II
(67,782 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Maybe they just forgot.
George II ...
Chevy
(1,063 posts)frankieallen
(583 posts)BainsBane
(53,072 posts)2014, I believe.
George II
(67,782 posts)pnwmom
(108,995 posts)The worst they can say about her is that she believed her older relatives about having Native American blood.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Chevy
(1,063 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 29, 2017, 09:48 AM - Edit history (1)
a professional female mother of two in college hyper liberal progressive and I will be flamed to hell for this, but:
I will not vote for anybody over the age of 60 -ish ever again ever ever ever.
Chevy
(1,063 posts)LOL Lib
(1,462 posts)You wouldn't vote for a 45 year old WJC? JFK? A 50 year old BHO? Again just curious.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Corrected. Oy vey.
LOL Lib
(1,462 posts)Perfect response too! "Oy vey!" That's how most of my days start out.
brush
(53,871 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Only dems die in office and it ain't from old age...
brush
(53,871 posts)Petrushka
(3,709 posts)Oh-h, that cannot be right . . . because some cognitive skills peak as early as age 22!
http://www.webmd.com/brain/news/20090323/decline-in-mental-skills-may-start-in-20s#1
SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)and the fact that the school had to close down because of them warrant a deeper look into what exactly occurred there. This isn't some plot to tarnish Sanders. Should they have just ignored what could have been criminal behavior by a college president because she is married to a U.S. Senator?
brush
(53,871 posts)Last edited Fri May 12, 2017, 10:22 AM - Edit history (1)
Petrushka
(3,709 posts). . . that money business (**uh**) revelation?
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-tuAMkp6wEC0/U0XbG9ISdcI/AAAAAAAAEWE/efG-t69zyhk/s1600/Inquiring+minds+want+to+know.jpg
brush
(53,871 posts)Petrushka
(3,709 posts)Interesting website, too. I've bookmarked it for later. Found an article about Appalachia---posted it to my Facebook page.
OnDoutside
(19,972 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)But even worse is the cover up.
OnDoutside
(19,972 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)Would it be a slap on the wrist or an orange jumpsuit?
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Since it's 2 million $$ I imagine it's more than a slap on the wrist.
It would be a shame if they're not able to enjoy the $600k summer home they bought right after the election.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)I care when someone holds others to a yardstick they themselves don't measure up to.
George II
(67,782 posts)dchill
(38,539 posts)Brady Toensing, the attorney asking for the fraud investigation, is the son of Victoria Toensing, infamous Republican shit-stirrer and attorney, whose law partner and husband is Joseph diGenova, Fox talker and known advocate of fake accusations. I don't know of any legitimate cause these bottom feeders have been involved with.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Shady, crooked liars.. all of them. The only reason I posted this is because it contains e-mails that talk about destroying the financial records of the college...
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)This isn't about a story that ended with a lawsuit brought on behalf of some Catholic parisioners, it's about how that got picked up by the FBI and DOJ.
Cha
(297,692 posts)Cha
(297,692 posts)opted for this shit. Aided by comey, Russian, voter suppression, and the m$m.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 28, 2017, 11:21 AM - Edit history (1)
this really isn't a distraction.
Cha
(297,692 posts)for they don't want to talk about it.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)StevieM
(10,500 posts)lower case letter.
Let's show out contempt for him by calling him james comey.
Cha
(297,692 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I curse EVERYONE who lied about, smeared, thwarted, and sabotaged Hillary.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,121 posts)but i cant say anymore, i dont want to get in trouble
Cha
(297,692 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,343 posts)Cha
(297,692 posts)your fucking problem.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,343 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)PaintedSkies
(99 posts)I hope he runs in 2020. I really liked him a lot despite him being often being forgotten
dembotoz
(16,835 posts)But the use of the police for political purposes is I guess the new Norm
Can camps be far behind?
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)betsuni
(25,630 posts)mcar
(42,375 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)yodermon
(6,143 posts)1) Jane was running? Oh "involved". mkay.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Hillary was not a "target" of investigation, and we don't know if Jane was or is.
And yes, Bill Clinton's actions past and present were deemed very relevant to HRC's campaign, so yes, spouses do "run" as well.
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)I don't know whether or not Jane accepted dirty money. I do know that spouses who are involved in a campaign (as almost all are in some capacity) are relevant. Everybody made sure of that re Hillary and Bill Clinton. Jane shouldn't be immune, either.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)And yet we have 45 as Pres, BS being treated as savior of the DEm party and HRC still being insulted and citicized.... not to mention her daughter being pilloried while Ivanka grifts her way around the WH.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)and Hillary WAS under investigation during the primaries -- just as the Sanders are reputed to be now. It may likely come to the same result -- not a positive endorsement, but no criminal charges. In fact, there is absolutely nothing suggesting that Bernie Sanders is being investigated. Just as most people here correctly objected to comments that there was an FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton, when the initial story was that there was an investigation, but it might not target Clinton.
As to "cover up", that accusation is coming from a RW guy who routinely loses the suits he files. From the typically thorough VT Digger article, it looks like the Burlington College lawyer went out of his way to insure that the DOJ and later the FBI had access to any records before they were destroyed.
Raster
(20,998 posts)...its kind of sad... when the innuendo is against their fave: BAD! ...when the innuendo is used against someone they have a beef with -real or imagined- then innuendo: GOOD!
Funny, that.
Cha
(297,692 posts)early.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)him to.
Put it like this: If Hillary wasn't running for president there never would have been an FBI investigation. The GOP pushed for it so they could defame her. In truth, there was nothing worth investigating.
Comey set out to destroy her candidacy, first with a bogus investigation, second with the July press conference and finally with his last minute letter to Chaffetz.
This was not consistent with liberal democracy.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)...on Sanders' strange refusal to release tax returns.
But leaping to "cover-up" seems premature.
Hekate
(90,824 posts)Gothmog
(145,567 posts)sheshe2
(83,925 posts)nini
(16,672 posts)She was just way too sanctimonious with her Hillary criticisms when she has her own baggage. This and the toxic waste issue too.
Me.
(35,454 posts)R B Garr
(16,979 posts)for their misplaced accusations against Hillary now that we see their ongoing legal fraud trouble with the FBI.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)nini
(16,672 posts)The loved every minute of trashing Hillary and Democrats.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)LOL Lib
(1,462 posts)WhiteTara
(29,722 posts)who hate democrats and along with her husband Andrew Napolatano (sp?) spent most of their lives hounding the Clintons. This may not be fake news, but it has a definite slant.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Toensing wasn't the one who decided there was enough for the FBI to start a probe.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)There is a man with the last name of Toesing, a Republican lawyer.
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)deliberately fraudulently filing loan documents that led to a college's eventual closure, that's wrong no matter who made the accusation.
George II
(67,782 posts)....was all over the GW Bridge scandal.
VT Digger has been on the case from the beginning.
randome
(34,845 posts)betsuni
(25,630 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Just replace "Barack Obama", the, "inadequate black male", with "Bernie Sanders", and "Michelle Obama" with "Jane Sanders".
I really hoped I would never such nasty and hateful behavior emanate from the Democratic Party again, but alas, here we are again.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)LexVegas
(6,098 posts)Nevernose
(13,081 posts)Is that the Clintons punish their enemies, even fellow liberals, and are willing to spend years doing it. Of course, that's how politics is played at higher levels, but the Clintons are notoriously vindictive and have been since the Arkansas days.
(And though it's certainly not apparent from this post, I've always been and always will be a huge fan of the Clinton family. Incredibly admirable and aspirational)
LexVegas
(6,098 posts)SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)I know folks are going to try and point out that the Toensings are involved, but it seems like the DoJ/FBI is involved in some way, which isn't surprising giving how shady the initial Burlington College deal seemed and it's subsequent closure last year. I'm glad they are investigating after what happened to that school. Hell, if she weren't named Jane Sanders, we'd be crucifying the college president for potentially committing fraud and causing the school to close down.
frankieallen
(583 posts)Certainly not calling it a witch hunt
seaglass
(8,173 posts)deal.
https://www.sevendaysvt.com/OffMessage/archives/2017/04/28/fbi-continues-to-investigate-jane-sanders-burlington-college-land-deal
Sara Adsit-McCuin, who served on the defunct college's board for roughly three years, said Friday that she was contacted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation "a couple of weeks ago." During an in-person interview, two FBI agents focused their questions on Burlington College's 2010 purchase of a 32-acre campus overlooking Lake Champlain. At the time of the deal, O'Meara Sanders was serving as the college's president.
...
Holm said she provided the FBI a filing cabinet and three or four banker boxes filled with donor files. At the bureau's request, she searched email accounts that previously belonged to O'Meara Sanders and Christine Plunkett, who served as O'Meara Sanders' chief financial officer and then succeeded her as president. Holm said she transferred those and other electronic files to a hard drive provided by the FBI.
Asked if she found anything noteworthy in O'Meara Sanders' emails, Holm said, "I prefer not to comment on that."
While searching for information to aid the FBI's investigation, Holm said she had been "unsuccessful in locating documentation of the gifts and pledges" O'Meara Sanders represented in the loan application she signed.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Because that doesn't paint a very good picture.
Cha
(297,692 posts)brush
(53,871 posts)seaglass
(8,173 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)is the fact that Sanders was in a position to inflict damage on Clinton at the same time the feds were in a position to damage his wife and him. In other words it raises questions of whether he was manipulated wittingly or not by wingnuts with badges not known for their ethical conduct.