Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
148 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
EMAILS REVEAL FBI, JUSTICE PROBE OF BURLINGTON COLLEGE. ( Jane Sanders ) (Original Post) fun n serious Apr 2017 OP
They are just getting ready for Bernie's run in 2020. Watch what they pull out on E Warren. nikibatts Apr 2017 #1
Well hold on a second, he still hasn't released his taxes. He OnDoutside Apr 2017 #4
Agreed. You know that Warren would absolutely release her financials, being as ehrnst Apr 2017 #21
She certainly would and has. OnDoutside Apr 2017 #24
Oh that's right. You know, I don't believe Bernie ever did release his taxes. Weird... NurseJackie Apr 2017 #23
I reckon it was probably something small but embarrassing at the time, maybe NRA related which OnDoutside Apr 2017 #27
I honestly couldn't say... it's difficult to know one way or the other. Surely he/they are aware... NurseJackie Apr 2017 #31
Well nobody (apart from us) are talking about him not releasing his taxes, so it's probably not OnDoutside Apr 2017 #32
I think that it should be added to the party platform that presidential candidates must release ehrnst Apr 2017 #37
I'd agree with that if we were dealing with decent human beings OnDoutside Apr 2017 #47
Whether or not the GOP does it, Dems need to make it a part of the requirement. ehrnst Apr 2017 #48
No problem with it being part of the Democratic rules but OnDoutside Apr 2017 #64
Indeed. More than half the states are already moving to make it law to that to get on the ballot ehrnst Apr 2017 #65
Thanks, i hadn't heard of the States moves... good news. OnDoutside Apr 2017 #66
I doubt it will become law, where would you draw the line? Congress would be the ones voting frankieallen Apr 2017 #136
After the current experience, I'd imagine there would be buy in on at least the President and Vice-P OnDoutside Apr 2017 #142
If there's anything that you do NOT want to "put aside" in a campaign is your financial paperwork ehrnst Apr 2017 #36
Geraldine Ferraro and her husband will pay $53,459 in back taxes and penalties discovered... Omaha Steve Apr 2017 #56
LOL! NurseJackie Apr 2017 #59
. Omaha Steve Apr 2017 #60
LOL! NurseJackie Apr 2017 #61
They both died years ago. George II Apr 2017 #82
Rest in Peace. Geraldine Ferraro (1935-2011) NurseJackie Apr 2017 #83
You're right - the google search showed the dates he was married to her, ending in 2011. My bad! George II Apr 2017 #84
At first glance it looks as though they both died in the same year... NurseJackie Apr 2017 #86
LOL (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #68
This message was self-deleted by its author George II Apr 2017 #80
Released 2014 and Mother Jones has it Omaha Steve Apr 2017 #63
Yes, Sanders released the one year of tax returns. n/t tammywammy Apr 2017 #67
Like Drumpf released 2005 Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2017 #127
LOL ... That's it? NurseJackie Apr 2017 #69
One year, not the most recent, and not the past 6 years worth, as Obama and HRC did in 2008. ehrnst Apr 2017 #72
Jane Sanders said they would be released a week or so after they returned from the Vatican. George II Apr 2017 #75
Yes... I remember now. She did say that. I wonder what happened. Why the delay? NurseJackie Apr 2017 #76
Couldn't find the key to the file cabinet? n/t Chevy Apr 2017 #104
Maybe they were stolen during an unsolved burglary? 👌 frankieallen Apr 2017 #138
He released one year BainsBane Apr 2017 #78
He won't be running in 2020. He might not even run in 2018. George II Apr 2017 #71
This was known about Jane last year. There is nothing similar for Warren that I've heard about. pnwmom Apr 2017 #6
It appears the FBI investigation predates Trump. hrmjustin Apr 2017 #17
Do you have any sympathy for the kids that paid their tuition and then couldn't go? Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #22
Apparently not lunamagica Apr 2017 #109
He'll be 80 years old. n/t Chevy Apr 2017 #52
Thank you for pointing this out. I am in my late 50s, elehhhhna Apr 2017 #102
Fair enough. n/t Chevy Apr 2017 #103
Not flaming...just curious why? LOL Lib Apr 2017 #105
Oh fuck I meant OVER 60. !!! elehhhhna Apr 2017 #117
Lmao! That makes more sense and I totally agree! LOL Lib Apr 2017 #118
Probably because there's a chance of them dying in office. brush Apr 2017 #128
Cognitive decline, actually. elehhhhna Apr 2017 #132
Cognitive decline is possible at 80 but let's be real, so is death. Ted Kennedy died in office at 77 brush Apr 2017 #134
Coognitive decline doesn't begin at 60. It sets in as early as age 45! Petrushka May 2017 #145
Jane's actions concerning Burlington College have always been a cause for concern... SaschaHM Apr 2017 #112
She also funneled a good deal of money to her daughter's business. brush Apr 2017 #129
Ooh! Did she? Really? (This is getting juicier and juicer!) Do you have a link to that . . . Petrushka May 2017 #146
There's this. brush May 2017 #147
Interesting article . . . thanks for the link. Petrushka May 2017 #148
Would she be in criminal trouble for overstating that amount ? OnDoutside Apr 2017 #2
Yes, it's fraud.. fun n serious Apr 2017 #3
Thanks for clarifying, that makes sense. OnDoutside Apr 2017 #5
If Convicted Me. Apr 2017 #34
I don't know.. fun n serious Apr 2017 #44
Summer home enid602 Apr 2017 #54
! Me. Apr 2017 #55
I don't care if or how they bought a home. ehrnst Apr 2017 #58
We don't have all the details, but bank fraud would come to mind first (Federal crime) George II Apr 2017 #73
Beware of Toensings bearing gifts... dchill Apr 2017 #7
The entire GOP is crooked. fun n serious Apr 2017 #8
Who asked for the probe is secondary to the fact that FBI/DOJ found cause to get involved. ehrnst Apr 2017 #26
Literally the only person involved in the 2016 election not under FBI investigation is Clinton. Cha Apr 2017 #9
Hi Cha. fun n serious Apr 2017 #10
Yes, Hillary would be a great Prez.. but the suckers.. Cha Apr 2017 #12
Yes, with all the discussion here about being under any FBI scrutiny being damning ehrnst Apr 2017 #20
Hell no, it's not a "distraction".. that code Cha Apr 2017 #91
Discomfort... (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #122
I realize it was probably a typo, but I kind of like the idea of starting comey's name with StevieM Apr 2017 #96
No, it wasn't a typo.. he's not worth the effort to me. Cha Apr 2017 #98
Now that you mention it... you're ABSOLUTELY CORRECT!! NurseJackie Apr 2017 #28
It is going on still, from alleged progressives. Eliot Rosewater Apr 2017 #53
trump is on them.. LIARS. they all played their part Cha Apr 2017 #92
Does that include people who said god awful things about her in 2008? Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2017 #120
I know you people can't get over 2008 but that's Cha Apr 2017 #123
Lol.ok. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2017 #124
And continues to. (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #116
Somewhere Martin O'Malley is crying PaintedSkies Apr 2017 #11
He would have been wonderful dembotoz Apr 2017 #13
. NCTraveler Apr 2017 #14
... Cha Apr 2017 #15
And the only people who didn't swallow the misinformation are her supporters. (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #16
Right. Cha Apr 2017 #18
Yep. nt jrthin Apr 2017 #88
The irony is overwhelming. I can't, either. betsuni Apr 2017 #25
It makes my blood boil, what they did to this honorable woman mcar Apr 2017 #29
+1 nt jrthin Apr 2017 #85
I feel the same way. Where is the justice? WHERE? lunamagica Apr 2017 #108
1) HRC *was* under investigation, Comey made that clear. yodermon Apr 2017 #30
It was a probe. Just like this one for Jane. ehrnst Apr 2017 #35
Bingo NastyRiffraff Apr 2017 #45
No. Cha Apr 2017 #94
But she shouldn't have been under investigation. Comey abused his power. (eom) StevieM Apr 2017 #97
Mind Blowing Me. Apr 2017 #33
Neither was Matin O'Malley or several of the 17 Republicans running karynnj Apr 2017 #50
oopsie... pesky facts again... Raster Apr 2017 #62
Yeah, Iman wasn't thinking of Martin.. who dropped out Cha Apr 2017 #95
But there was no truthful basis for investigating HRC. Comey did it because the GOP congress asked StevieM Apr 2017 #99
+1 uponit7771 Apr 2017 #113
... Cha Apr 2017 #114
This is sad but hopefully nothing comes of it. hrmjustin Apr 2017 #19
Casts a little more of a shadow... Orsino Apr 2017 #38
Oh dear. Kicking to read later. nt Hekate Apr 2017 #39
This will be interesting to watch Gothmog Apr 2017 #40
Oh my.... sheshe2 Apr 2017 #41
Good nini Apr 2017 #42
Comes Around, Goes Around Me. Apr 2017 #43
+1000. (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #49
Exactly. It would be nice if Jane apologizes or Bernie apologizes on behalf of his wife R B Garr Apr 2017 #70
You know, you're absolutely right. That *would* be the honorable thing to do! NurseJackie Apr 2017 #77
Don't hold your breath nini Apr 2017 #107
WORD lunamagica Apr 2017 #110
Pity... grossproffit Apr 2017 #46
Awesome! LOL Lib Apr 2017 #106
Victoria Toensing is one of "those" people WhiteTara Apr 2017 #51
This isn't about the complaint, it's about the FBI probe that resulted from the complaint. ehrnst Apr 2017 #57
The article doesn't even mention her BainsBane Apr 2017 #81
The article isn't slanted. If Jane Sanders did what she's being investigated for, pnwmom Apr 2017 #79
VT Digger is one of the better independent media outlets - like a small town Northjersey.com...who.. George II Apr 2017 #74
I think it's distasteful. randome Apr 2017 #87
Good one. betsuni Apr 2017 #90
Man is this just like the summer of 2008. Barack_America Apr 2017 #89
The Democratic Party is not doing this. hrmjustin Apr 2017 #93
... LexVegas Apr 2017 #100
One of the themes of "Shattered" Nevernose Apr 2017 #126
Karma. nt LexVegas Apr 2017 #101
Woah..this is big. SaschaHM Apr 2017 #111
You speak the truth. If this were anyone else everyone here would be calling for her head. frankieallen Apr 2017 #139
There is an updated article here with more info, it appears they are definitely focusing on the land seaglass Apr 2017 #115
Wow! hrmjustin Apr 2017 #119
I hope there is more to the story than what is seen so far Lee-Lee Apr 2017 #121
Thank you, seaglass.. Cha Apr 2017 #125
So she was going under the name O'Meara Sanders then? brush Apr 2017 #130
Sh actually still does. seaglass Apr 2017 #131
What's disturbing (apart from the hypocrisy but that's old news) ucrdem Apr 2017 #133
That's a very good point. nt fun n serious Apr 2017 #137
Cover-up about what, exactly? WinkyDink Apr 2017 #135
The same question we've been asking for years about the supposed crimes of Hillary Clinton. betsuni Apr 2017 #140
Is this supposed to be an answer? WinkyDink Apr 2017 #143
I still don't get it. WinkyDink Apr 2017 #144
This will be an interesting case to follow Gothmog Apr 2017 #141

OnDoutside

(19,972 posts)
4. Well hold on a second, he still hasn't released his taxes. He
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 02:30 AM
Apr 2017

still has questions to answer and shouldn't be allowed run until he comes clean.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
21. Agreed. You know that Warren would absolutely release her financials, being as
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 10:41 AM
Apr 2017

financial reform is one of her big issues....

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
23. Oh that's right. You know, I don't believe Bernie ever did release his taxes. Weird...
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 10:44 AM
Apr 2017

... I wonder why. There must be some logical and reasonable explanation.

OnDoutside

(19,972 posts)
27. I reckon it was probably something small but embarrassing at the time, maybe NRA related which
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 10:49 AM
Apr 2017

isn't a big deal in Vermont but would be embarrassing nationally.

And his excuse was that Jane did his taxes but didn't have the time because of their campaigning.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
31. I honestly couldn't say... it's difficult to know one way or the other. Surely he/they are aware...
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 10:59 AM
Apr 2017

... of how bad it looks, and that in general, the public always assume the worst. They're not stupid, so obviously they know this.

So, that makes me wonder (again, I don't know, but I wonder) whether someone has made a calculated risk and decided that having the public "not-know-and-assume-the-worst" is somehow better than having the public ACTUALLY KNOW the truth.

For and experienced lifelong establishment politician like Bernie, this certainly (in my opinion) is very odd and it makes me curious what's going on.

These are just my opinions and my questions.

OnDoutside

(19,972 posts)
32. Well nobody (apart from us) are talking about him not releasing his taxes, so it's probably not
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 11:05 AM
Apr 2017

going to be an issue until the next Presidential run, if he does run. You can be certainly that it would be a huge issue then though, after Trump's failure to show his taxes. I would be quite sure that there will be a law brought in, barring anyone from running without having first produced their last 10/15 years of taxes.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
37. I think that it should be added to the party platform that presidential candidates must release
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 11:28 AM
Apr 2017

tax forms and financials.

I would think that releasing them would be a no-brainer for someone who is making financial transparency a tentpole of their political career.

OnDoutside

(19,972 posts)
47. I'd agree with that if we were dealing with decent human beings
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 12:49 PM
Apr 2017

on the Republican side. I think it needs to be put into law so they can't weasel out of it when it suits them.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
48. Whether or not the GOP does it, Dems need to make it a part of the requirement.
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 02:04 PM
Apr 2017

Last edited Fri Apr 28, 2017, 03:43 PM - Edit history (2)

I doubt it will make it into law in the current administration.

But at least our candidates being required to release the documents will cause those with something to hide in those returns to self select out of seeking the nomination.

OnDoutside

(19,972 posts)
64. No problem with it being part of the Democratic rules but
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 04:48 PM
Apr 2017

the aim should be to make it law. Obviously it won't happen this side of the midterms..... Fingers crossed !!!

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
65. Indeed. More than half the states are already moving to make it law to that to get on the ballot
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 04:54 PM
Apr 2017

in presidential elections in that state, a candidate must release tax returns.

So hopefully that will make it unnecessary to make it federal law to keep the kind of candidate that refuses basic transparency of their own finances out of the running on any ticket. From any party. Because really, what normal, ethical reason would there be to refuse?

http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/14/opinions/state-laws-requiring-tax-return-disclosure-legal-tribe-painter-eisen/

 

frankieallen

(583 posts)
136. I doubt it will become law, where would you draw the line? Congress would be the ones voting
Sun Apr 30, 2017, 09:14 AM
Apr 2017

on this, so they would have to have it apply to anyone running for public office (federal),or appear hypocritical.
I bet there are plenty of congress critters on both sides that would rather not put there tax returns on the internet for all to see.

OnDoutside

(19,972 posts)
142. After the current experience, I'd imagine there would be buy in on at least the President and Vice-P
Sun Apr 30, 2017, 04:16 PM
Apr 2017

residential candidates.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
36. If there's anything that you do NOT want to "put aside" in a campaign is your financial paperwork
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 11:25 AM
Apr 2017

I have to wonder if Sierra Blanca was the embarassing issue.

Omaha Steve

(99,727 posts)
56. Geraldine Ferraro and her husband will pay $53,459 in back taxes and penalties discovered...
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 03:44 PM
Apr 2017

Seems there is a precedent on taxes, spouses, back taxes after running for office!

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
86. At first glance it looks as though they both died in the same year...
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 06:46 PM
Apr 2017

... but I thought that would have been very odd, so I poked around some more until I found out more.

Response to Omaha Steve (Reply #56)

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
72. One year, not the most recent, and not the past 6 years worth, as Obama and HRC did in 2008.
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 05:32 PM
Apr 2017

Warren releases hers, and has since 2008 when she was elected, and Corey Booker released 15 years worth when he ran for Senate.

Schumer and Gillibrand release theirs.

"The tax return is the lowest ethical bar that you can have for a presidential nominee or a president," said Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, top Senate Finance Democrat who introduced legislation in January requiring nominees and sitting presidents to disclose their returns."

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-taxreturns-idUSKBN1685TP

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
76. Yes... I remember now. She did say that. I wonder what happened. Why the delay?
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 05:54 PM
Apr 2017

Maybe they just forgot.






George II ...

pnwmom

(108,995 posts)
6. This was known about Jane last year. There is nothing similar for Warren that I've heard about.
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 02:33 AM
Apr 2017

The worst they can say about her is that she believed her older relatives about having Native American blood.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
102. Thank you for pointing this out. I am in my late 50s,
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 07:56 PM
Apr 2017

Last edited Sat Apr 29, 2017, 09:48 AM - Edit history (1)

a professional female mother of two in college hyper liberal progressive and I will be flamed to hell for this, but:

I will not vote for anybody over the age of 60 -ish ever again ever ever ever.

LOL Lib

(1,462 posts)
105. Not flaming...just curious why?
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 08:17 PM
Apr 2017

You wouldn't vote for a 45 year old WJC? JFK? A 50 year old BHO? Again just curious.

LOL Lib

(1,462 posts)
118. Lmao! That makes more sense and I totally agree!
Sat Apr 29, 2017, 09:53 AM
Apr 2017

Perfect response too! "Oy vey!" That's how most of my days start out.

brush

(53,871 posts)
134. Cognitive decline is possible at 80 but let's be real, so is death. Ted Kennedy died in office at 77
Sun Apr 30, 2017, 09:04 AM
Apr 2017

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
112. Jane's actions concerning Burlington College have always been a cause for concern...
Sat Apr 29, 2017, 12:31 AM
Apr 2017

and the fact that the school had to close down because of them warrant a deeper look into what exactly occurred there. This isn't some plot to tarnish Sanders. Should they have just ignored what could have been criminal behavior by a college president because she is married to a U.S. Senator?

brush

(53,871 posts)
129. She also funneled a good deal of money to her daughter's business.
Sun Apr 30, 2017, 02:37 AM
Apr 2017

Last edited Fri May 12, 2017, 10:22 AM - Edit history (1)

Petrushka

(3,709 posts)
148. Interesting article . . . thanks for the link.
Fri May 12, 2017, 11:32 PM
May 2017

Interesting website, too. I've bookmarked it for later. Found an article about Appalachia---posted it to my Facebook page.

enid602

(8,654 posts)
54. Summer home
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 03:03 PM
Apr 2017

It would be a shame if they're not able to enjoy the $600k summer home they bought right after the election.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
58. I don't care if or how they bought a home.
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 03:45 PM
Apr 2017

I care when someone holds others to a yardstick they themselves don't measure up to.

dchill

(38,539 posts)
7. Beware of Toensings bearing gifts...
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 03:15 AM
Apr 2017

Brady Toensing, the attorney asking for the fraud investigation, is the son of Victoria Toensing, infamous Republican shit-stirrer and attorney, whose law partner and husband is Joseph diGenova, Fox talker and known advocate of fake accusations. I don't know of any legitimate cause these bottom feeders have been involved with.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
8. The entire GOP is crooked.
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 03:37 AM
Apr 2017

Shady, crooked liars.. all of them. The only reason I posted this is because it contains e-mails that talk about destroying the financial records of the college...

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
26. Who asked for the probe is secondary to the fact that FBI/DOJ found cause to get involved.
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 10:47 AM
Apr 2017

This isn't about a story that ended with a lawsuit brought on behalf of some Catholic parisioners, it's about how that got picked up by the FBI and DOJ.

Cha

(297,692 posts)
12. Yes, Hillary would be a great Prez.. but the suckers..
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 07:48 AM
Apr 2017

opted for this shit. Aided by comey, Russian, voter suppression, and the m$m.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
20. Yes, with all the discussion here about being under any FBI scrutiny being damning
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 10:40 AM
Apr 2017

Last edited Fri Apr 28, 2017, 11:21 AM - Edit history (1)

this really isn't a distraction.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
96. I realize it was probably a typo, but I kind of like the idea of starting comey's name with
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 07:08 PM
Apr 2017

lower case letter.

Let's show out contempt for him by calling him james comey.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
28. Now that you mention it... you're ABSOLUTELY CORRECT!!
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 10:51 AM
Apr 2017

I curse EVERYONE who lied about, smeared, thwarted, and sabotaged Hillary.





 

PaintedSkies

(99 posts)
11. Somewhere Martin O'Malley is crying
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 07:34 AM
Apr 2017

I hope he runs in 2020. I really liked him a lot despite him being often being forgotten

dembotoz

(16,835 posts)
13. He would have been wonderful
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 08:01 AM
Apr 2017

But the use of the police for political purposes is I guess the new Norm
Can camps be far behind?

yodermon

(6,143 posts)
30. 1) HRC *was* under investigation, Comey made that clear.
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 10:53 AM
Apr 2017

1) Jane was running? Oh "involved". mkay.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
35. It was a probe. Just like this one for Jane.
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 11:22 AM
Apr 2017

Hillary was not a "target" of investigation, and we don't know if Jane was or is.

And yes, Bill Clinton's actions past and present were deemed very relevant to HRC's campaign, so yes, spouses do "run" as well.

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
45. Bingo
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 12:16 PM
Apr 2017

I don't know whether or not Jane accepted dirty money. I do know that spouses who are involved in a campaign (as almost all are in some capacity) are relevant. Everybody made sure of that re Hillary and Bill Clinton. Jane shouldn't be immune, either.

Me.

(35,454 posts)
33. Mind Blowing
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 11:07 AM
Apr 2017

And yet we have 45 as Pres, BS being treated as savior of the DEm party and HRC still being insulted and citicized.... not to mention her daughter being pilloried while Ivanka grifts her way around the WH.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
50. Neither was Matin O'Malley or several of the 17 Republicans running
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 02:35 PM
Apr 2017

and Hillary WAS under investigation during the primaries -- just as the Sanders are reputed to be now. It may likely come to the same result -- not a positive endorsement, but no criminal charges. In fact, there is absolutely nothing suggesting that Bernie Sanders is being investigated. Just as most people here correctly objected to comments that there was an FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton, when the initial story was that there was an investigation, but it might not target Clinton.

As to "cover up", that accusation is coming from a RW guy who routinely loses the suits he files. From the typically thorough VT Digger article, it looks like the Burlington College lawyer went out of his way to insure that the DOJ and later the FBI had access to any records before they were destroyed.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
62. oopsie... pesky facts again...
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 03:57 PM
Apr 2017

...its kind of sad... when the innuendo is against their fave: BAD! ...when the innuendo is used against someone they have a beef with -real or imagined- then innuendo: GOOD!

Funny, that.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
99. But there was no truthful basis for investigating HRC. Comey did it because the GOP congress asked
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 07:15 PM
Apr 2017

him to.

Put it like this: If Hillary wasn't running for president there never would have been an FBI investigation. The GOP pushed for it so they could defame her. In truth, there was nothing worth investigating.

Comey set out to destroy her candidacy, first with a bogus investigation, second with the July press conference and finally with his last minute letter to Chaffetz.

This was not consistent with liberal democracy.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
38. Casts a little more of a shadow...
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 11:38 AM
Apr 2017

...on Sanders' strange refusal to release tax returns.

But leaping to "cover-up" seems premature.

nini

(16,672 posts)
42. Good
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 11:59 AM
Apr 2017

She was just way too sanctimonious with her Hillary criticisms when she has her own baggage. This and the toxic waste issue too.

R B Garr

(16,979 posts)
70. Exactly. It would be nice if Jane apologizes or Bernie apologizes on behalf of his wife
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 05:23 PM
Apr 2017

for their misplaced accusations against Hillary now that we see their ongoing legal fraud trouble with the FBI.

WhiteTara

(29,722 posts)
51. Victoria Toensing is one of "those" people
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 02:44 PM
Apr 2017

who hate democrats and along with her husband Andrew Napolatano (sp?) spent most of their lives hounding the Clintons. This may not be fake news, but it has a definite slant.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
57. This isn't about the complaint, it's about the FBI probe that resulted from the complaint.
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 03:44 PM
Apr 2017

Toensing wasn't the one who decided there was enough for the FBI to start a probe.

BainsBane

(53,072 posts)
81. The article doesn't even mention her
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 06:02 PM
Apr 2017

There is a man with the last name of Toesing, a Republican lawyer.

pnwmom

(108,995 posts)
79. The article isn't slanted. If Jane Sanders did what she's being investigated for,
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 06:00 PM
Apr 2017

deliberately fraudulently filing loan documents that led to a college's eventual closure, that's wrong no matter who made the accusation.

George II

(67,782 posts)
74. VT Digger is one of the better independent media outlets - like a small town Northjersey.com...who..
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 05:43 PM
Apr 2017

....was all over the GW Bridge scandal.

VT Digger has been on the case from the beginning.

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
89. Man is this just like the summer of 2008.
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 06:56 PM
Apr 2017

Just replace "Barack Obama", the, "inadequate black male", with "Bernie Sanders", and "Michelle Obama" with "Jane Sanders".

I really hoped I would never such nasty and hateful behavior emanate from the Democratic Party again, but alas, here we are again.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
126. One of the themes of "Shattered"
Sun Apr 30, 2017, 01:02 AM
Apr 2017

Is that the Clintons punish their enemies, even fellow liberals, and are willing to spend years doing it. Of course, that's how politics is played at higher levels, but the Clintons are notoriously vindictive and have been since the Arkansas days.

(And though it's certainly not apparent from this post, I've always been and always will be a huge fan of the Clinton family. Incredibly admirable and aspirational)

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
111. Woah..this is big.
Sat Apr 29, 2017, 12:27 AM
Apr 2017

I know folks are going to try and point out that the Toensings are involved, but it seems like the DoJ/FBI is involved in some way, which isn't surprising giving how shady the initial Burlington College deal seemed and it's subsequent closure last year. I'm glad they are investigating after what happened to that school. Hell, if she weren't named Jane Sanders, we'd be crucifying the college president for potentially committing fraud and causing the school to close down.

 

frankieallen

(583 posts)
139. You speak the truth. If this were anyone else everyone here would be calling for her head.
Sun Apr 30, 2017, 10:13 AM
Apr 2017

Certainly not calling it a witch hunt

seaglass

(8,173 posts)
115. There is an updated article here with more info, it appears they are definitely focusing on the land
Sat Apr 29, 2017, 07:30 AM
Apr 2017

deal.

https://www.sevendaysvt.com/OffMessage/archives/2017/04/28/fbi-continues-to-investigate-jane-sanders-burlington-college-land-deal

Sara Adsit-McCuin, who served on the defunct college's board for roughly three years, said Friday that she was contacted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation "a couple of weeks ago." During an in-person interview, two FBI agents focused their questions on Burlington College's 2010 purchase of a 32-acre campus overlooking Lake Champlain. At the time of the deal, O'Meara Sanders was serving as the college's president.

...

Holm said she provided the FBI a filing cabinet and three or four banker boxes filled with donor files. At the bureau's request, she searched email accounts that previously belonged to O'Meara Sanders and Christine Plunkett, who served as O'Meara Sanders' chief financial officer and then succeeded her as president. Holm said she transferred those and other electronic files to a hard drive provided by the FBI.

Asked if she found anything noteworthy in O'Meara Sanders' emails, Holm said, "I prefer not to comment on that."

While searching for information to aid the FBI's investigation, Holm said she had been "unsuccessful in locating documentation of the gifts and pledges" O'Meara Sanders represented in the loan application she signed.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
121. I hope there is more to the story than what is seen so far
Sat Apr 29, 2017, 11:39 AM
Apr 2017

Because that doesn't paint a very good picture.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
133. What's disturbing (apart from the hypocrisy but that's old news)
Sun Apr 30, 2017, 08:06 AM
Apr 2017

is the fact that Sanders was in a position to inflict damage on Clinton at the same time the feds were in a position to damage his wife and him. In other words it raises questions of whether he was manipulated wittingly or not by wingnuts with badges not known for their ethical conduct.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»EMAILS REVEAL FBI, JUSTIC...