Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Apr 17, 2017, 10:28 AM Apr 2017

Republicans are now looking to pass a temporary tax cut that would balloon the deficit: report

The GOP is calling it an "eye candy" option for tax reform, and would include lots of deficit spending

MATTHEW ROZSA

Critics have already pointed out that the tax reform plan developed by House Speaker Paul Ryan would be a giant tax cut for the rich more than any kind of meaningful reform. That said, Republicans now seem to be considering an alternative that they’re hoping will achieve an impossible ideal — all gain, no pain.

The so-called “candy option” would lower both corporate and personal tax rates, along with limited repatriation, and would be funded primarily through deficit spending, according to a report by Axios. It would also include what’s being referred to as an “Ivanka credit,” which would apply to child care. Because it would add to the budget deficit, the tax cuts would have to be temporary, since permanent cuts can’t be made through the reconciliation process if they increase the deficit. This raises questions about whether the candy option would actually count as real tax reform at all.

One Republican lobbyist told Axios: “It’s something they can pass. We need to junk our current tax code for one more suited to the modern economy. But the ability to accomplish that goal just isn’t there.” That said, both House and Senate Republicans are skeptical as to whether the candy option could actually be passed.

Former chief White House ethics lawyers Richard Painter and Norman Eisen both argued in a Saturday editorial for USA Today that “at a minimum, before this administration even thinks of proposing any changes to the tax code, we should see what tax code provisions the president himself has been and is taking advantage of, and how much tax he has paid in the past few years. Otherwise we are bound to end up with a deal where the rest of us pay yet more tax while he, and probably his business partners and political allies, pay less.”

###

http://www.salon.com/2017/04/17/republicans-are-now-looking-to-pass-a-temporary-tax-cut-that-would-balloon-the-deficit-report/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans are now looking to pass a temporary tax cut that would balloon the deficit: report (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2017 OP
So, basically a reprise of the Bush tax cuts... Wounded Bear Apr 2017 #1
It will fail if the Tea Party frauds care about the deficit as much as they claim they do. LonePirate Apr 2017 #2
How would this pass the Freedom Caucus? titaniumsalute Apr 2017 #3
deficits only matter when democrats control the purse strings spanone Apr 2017 #4

Wounded Bear

(58,661 posts)
1. So, basically a reprise of the Bush tax cuts...
Mon Apr 17, 2017, 10:44 AM
Apr 2017

so much for all those new "conservative ideas" we were supposed to experience.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

LonePirate

(13,424 posts)
2. It will fail if the Tea Party frauds care about the deficit as much as they claim they do.
Mon Apr 17, 2017, 11:30 AM
Apr 2017

Of course, deficits only matter to Republicans when a Democrat is president.

titaniumsalute

(4,742 posts)
3. How would this pass the Freedom Caucus?
Mon Apr 17, 2017, 11:34 AM
Apr 2017

It won't. This will require Dems to vote for it which I sadly see a bunch doing for pure political reasons. It is unpopular to vote against Tax cuts. Unless the Dems truly stand together and point out that the tax cuts are merely for the 1% and big business which does NOTHING for Joe and Jane Mainstreet/suburb while adding to the deficits.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans are now looki...