General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI've been ragging on the L.A. Times since Trump began running,
as they seemed to be legitimizing the lying bastard's placement into our Presidency.
However, I was just online and decided to look at their online paper, and was shocked to see this:
(but, maybe they were okay with his ridiculousness, hate and lies until he started picking on the press).
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,611 posts)The series of editorials is well worth reading, and very well written.
I think they should get a Pulitzer for it.
WePurrsevere
(24,259 posts)For others to find easily here's a link to first in the series:
http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-ed-our-dishonest-president/
C Moon
(12,213 posts)I stopped reading the paper during the primary because
(to me anyway) they made Trump look like a legitimate candidateand I don't think he was anything less than a 100% lying ass. Maybe it was because I was on DU all the time, and the Times wasn't reflecting what I was reading here.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,611 posts)I don't recall thinking that they made him look legit, but I read them everyday and that may play a part in how I perceive them.
I tend to see their editorials as very fair.
Squinch
(50,949 posts)Hekate
(90,674 posts)Today was another. That makes 7.
On the whole, the LA Times remains a good newspaper.
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)I subscribed to LA Times digital because of it.