Just turned on Faux News, Donald trump's Team was under Surveillance???

[brettdale]

Please tell me, I heard it wrong?? He must be having a field day with this????

[rzemanfl]

1. 82 people looked at this and decided you need to be punished for turning on Faux. n/t

[KittyWampus]

2. lolz

[Luciferous]

3. Lol

[marybourg]

9. Watching it

is a punishment. Now the OP has to wander around questioning people, like the Ancient Mariner.

[Demsrule86]

16. 219

[rzemanfl]

4. 185 now. n/t

[leftstreet]

5. 197

[janx]

6. 216

[rzemanfl]

7. 218. No quarter here. n/t

[brettdale]

8. Am I wrong??? they werent???

Donald Trumps transitional team was under surveillance???

Am I wrong here?

[burnbaby]

10. no

not all but I heard flynn and manaford (sp) were under survelliance

[Demsrule86]

12. I hope not...the fucking traitors should be.

This is all bullshit to give Trump cover for his lies..but it actually makes him look more guilty.

[rzemanfl]

14. You are getting some help.

a victor gives no quarter (or takes no prisoners[1]) when the victor shows no clemency or mercy and refuses to spare the life of a vanquished opponent in return for their surrender at discretion (unconditional surrender).[2] In some circumstances, the opposing forces would signal their intention to give no quarter by using a red flag;[3][4] however, the use of a red flag to signal no quarter does not appear to have been universal among combatants.

[Demsrule86]

11. Why would that be a bad thing?

We know they were surveilling the Russians and Flynn who was part of Trump's team...there may be more...as Comey refused to say.

[jmg257]

13. Heard it wrong..."incidental" which as used here

Means overheard talking to people they shouldn't have been.

[Demsrule86]

15. you are watching Fox? Really...

[brettdale]

19. I had CNN on

And switch on Faux, was curious to see if they would turn it into a debate aboput
illegal immigrants, and saw the headline "Trump Transitional team under surveillance"

[Demsrule86]

21. Fox never has the truth.

[wishstar]

17. No they were not but they were inadvertently captured in legal surveillance of foreigners

Nunes still says Trump was wrong to claim Obama ordered wiretapping of Trump. That did not happen Nunes says.

But Nunes claims he saw intelligence report of of legal FISA warrant(s) of foreigners that inadvertently apparently recorded Trump and associates or mentioned their names. However everything was legally collected and names were properly masked. No conclusions could be drawn and this particular report was not involving Russians. Nunes is concerned that some leaks may have occurred of the masked names being unmasked by leakers.

Nunes is simply muddying waters, providing flimsy bandaid to give Trump some cover with no justification, since he still says Trump wrong to claim Obama ordered wiretaps as this report was not targeting Trump or any Americans and was entirely legal

[uponit7771]

18. +1

[rzemanfl]

20. He claims he could figure out who the masked names were. Does he think everyone else is

stupid?

[janx]

23. This is the most humorous aspect of the

whole thing, to me.

[retread]

22. You lost me at "Just turned on Faux News..."